Literature DB >> 32114247

Reference intervals for rotational thromboelastometry measurements using the ROTEM® delta device in dogs.

Jose Mauricio Pereira1, Karl Rohn2, Reinhard Mischke3.   

Abstract

Aims of the present study were to define reference intervals for viscoelastic analyses of canine haemostasis using the ROTEM® delta analyser, and as a secondary aspect to determine the precision (repeatability) of this method. Blood samples from 125 clinically healthy dogs were included. Measurements were performed with commercially available activating reagents (ex-tem, in-tem and kaolin solution) as well as without activation. Additional fourfold measurements were done in 3 of the normal blood samples and in 3 samples with haemostatic alterations to evaluate the precision of the method. Coefficients of variation (CVs) for most of the ROTEM variables were < 10%. Clot formation time and maximum clot elasticity showed a wide inter-individual variation in comparison with alpha angle and maximum clot firmness. A multivariate analysis on various ROTEM parameters revealed particularly a significant influence of neuter status and a significant interrelationship between the factors sex and neuter status for measurements with different activating reagents. These results reflected the fact that significant differences occurred only between intact and neutered females, but not in males. No or only occasionally significant differences were found between groups of sex, age, and size. In conclusion, CVs demonstrated that the method delivers repeatable results in canine citrated whole blood. Established reference intervals should deliver valuable orientation for the evaluation of viscoelastic properties of clotting whole blood in dogs using the ROTEM delta analyser. Neuter status in females appeared to be the most relevant influencing factor and should be considered for the interpretation of ROTEM delta test results.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Canine; Neuter status; Reference values; Sex; Viscoelastic measurements

Year:  2020        PMID: 32114247     DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Vet Sci        ISSN: 0034-5288            Impact factor:   2.534


  2 in total

1.  Comparison of assessment of coagulation in healthy dogs by the TEG 6s and TEG 5000 viscoelastic analyzers.

Authors:  Lance R Wheeler; Thomas H Edwards; Justin A Heinz; Laura L F Scott; Lonnie E Grantham; Jeffrey D Keesee; Alice F Henderson; Angelina C Gerardo; Guillaume Hoareau; James A Bynum
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 1.569

2.  Comparison of Jugular vs. Saphenous Blood Samples, Intrarater and In-Between Device Reliability of Clinically Used ROTEM S Parameters in Dogs.

Authors:  Johanna Vuille-Dit-Bille; Nicole Weingand; Rahel Jud Schefer; Martina Stirn; Katja-Nicole Adamik; Justus M K Rathmann; Nadja E Sigrist
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 3.231

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.