Literature DB >> 32111565

Retrospective evaluation of risk factors of postoperative varices after pancreaticoduodenectomy with combined portal vein resection.

Masahiro Shiihara1, Ryota Higuchi2, Wataru Izumo3, Takehisa Yazawa3, Shuichiro Uemura3, Toru Furukawa4, Masakazu Yamamoto4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined portal vein (PV) resection is performed for pancreatic head cancer to achieve clear resection margins. This can be complicated by the formation of varices due to sinistral portal hypertension after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with combined PV resection. However, clinical strategies to prevent varices formation due to sinistral portal hypertension remain controversial. Moreover, the critical vein among splenic vein (SPV), inferior mesenteric vein, left gastric vein, or middle colonic vein requiring preservation to prevent the development of varices remains unclear.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent PD with combined PV resection over 18 years at our institution. Varices were evaluated using enhanced computed tomography (CT) and endoscopy. Preoperative types of porto-mesenterico-splenic confluence, venous drainage, and venous resection types were determined by operative records and CT findings.
RESULTS: Of the 108 subjects, the incidence of postoperative varices was observed in 24.1% of cases over 5.6 months. These varices were classified into five types based on location, as pancreaticojejunostomy anastomotic (11.5%), gastrojejunostomy anastomotic (11.5%), esophageal (11.5%), splenic hilar-gastric (23.1%), and right colonic (65.4%) varices. No case of variceal bleeding occurred. Multivariate analysis showed SPV ligation as the greatest risk factor of varices (P < 0.001), with a higher incidence of left-sided varices in patients with all the SPV venous drainage sacrificed (60%) than in the others (16.7%). Therefore, sacrificing all the SPV venous drainage was the only independent risk factor of varices (P = 0.049).
CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of SPV venous drainage should be considered during SPV ligation to prevent post-PD varices.
Copyright © 2020 IAP and EPC. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Pancreatic cancer; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Portal hypertension; Portal vein; Varices

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32111565     DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2020.02.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pancreatology        ISSN: 1424-3903            Impact factor:   3.996


  3 in total

1.  A new option for laparoscopic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy: three cases with splenic artery preservation and resection of the splenic vein.

Authors:  Masataka Okuno; Yasuhiro Shimizu; Yoshiki Senda; Seiji Natsume; Shoji Kawakatsu; Seiji Ito; Koji Komori; Tetsuya Abe; Kazunari Misawa; Yuichi Ito; Takashi Kinoshita; Eiji Higaki; Hironori Fujieda; Yusuke Sato; Akira Ouchi; Masato Nagino; Kazuo Hara
Journal:  J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2022-04-03

2.  Computed tomography combined with gastroscopy for assessment of pancreatic segmental portal hypertension.

Authors:  Yu-Li Wang; Han-Wen Zhang; Fan Lin
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 1.534

3.  Should the Splenic Vein Be Preserved-Fate of Sinistral Portal Hypertension after Pancreatoduodenectomy with Vascular Re-Section for Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Kim; Seung-Seob Kim; Ho Kyoung Hwang; Woo Jung Lee; Chang Moo Kang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-10-04       Impact factor: 6.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.