| Literature DB >> 32109992 |
Min Zhang1,2, Jiangrong Wang1, Yong Zhang1, Pei Zhang1, Zhisheng Jia2, Manyi Ren1, Xiaomeng Jia1, Liping Ma1, Mei Gao1, Yinglong Hou1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective cohort study is to analyze the impacts of CYP2C19 polymorphism and clopidogrel dosing on in-stent restenosis (ISR) after coronary stenting.Entities:
Keywords: CYP2C19 polymorphism; ISR; PCI; clopidogrel; in-stent restenosis; percutaneous coronary intervention
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32109992 PMCID: PMC7038774 DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S242167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther ISSN: 1177-8881 Impact factor: 4.162
Baseline Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients Stratified by CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Dose
| Total | EM | IM75 | IM150 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person, n | 111 | 51 | 27 | 33 | |
| Clopidogrel, mg/day | – | 75 | 75 | 150 | |
| Age, yr | 66(59, 72) | 66(61, 70) | 68(56,76) | 64(53.5,72) | 0.356 |
| Males | 70 (63.1) | 36 (70.6) | 13 (48.1) | 21 (63.6) | 0.155 |
| Risk Factor | |||||
| Smoking | 51 (45.9) | 22 (43.1) | 10 (37.0) | 19 (57.6) | 0.254 |
| Drinking | 24 (21.6) | 14 (27.5) | 6 (22.2) | 4 (12.1) | 0.243 |
| Hypertension | 75 (67.6) | 35 (68.6) | 19 (70.4) | 21 (63.6) | 0.869 |
| Diabetes mellitus | 35 (31.5) | 20 (39.2) | 5 (18.5) | 10 (30.3) | 0.175 |
| Previous Conditions | |||||
| Myocardial infarction | 48 (43.2) | 20(39.2) | 15 (55.6) | 13 (39.4) | 0.363 |
| Stroke | 12 (10.8) | 7 (13.7) | 3 (11.1) | 2 (6.1) | 0.582 |
| Atrial fibrillation | 6 (5.4) | 3 (5.9) | 1 (3.7) | 2 (6.1) | 1.000 |
| CABG | 4 (3.6) | 1 (2.0) | 3 (11.1) | 0 (0.0) | 0.075 |
| Clinical Presentation | 0.872 | ||||
| ACS | 72 (64.9) | 34 (66.7) | 18 (66.7) | 20 (60.6) | |
| Stable angina | 39 (35.1) | 17 (33.3) | 9 (33.3) | 13 (39.4) | |
| Coronary Artery Lesionsa | 0.700 | ||||
| Single, vessel | 13 (11.7) | 5 (9.8) | 3 (11.1) | 5 (15.2) | |
| Double, vessel | 15 (13.5) | 9 (17.6) | 3 (11.1) | 3 (9.1) | |
| Triple, vessel | 57 (51.4) | 28 (54.9) | 12 (44.4) | 17 (51.5) | |
| Left main involved | 26 (23.4) | 9 (17.6) | 9(33.3) | 8 (24.2) | |
| Time from last CAG to reoperation, m | 8 (4, 12) | 8 (5, 12) | 8 (4, 12) | 8 (3, 11.5) | 0.514 |
| Number of stents at last PCI, n | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 2) | 2 (1, 3) | 0.260 |
| LDL-C, mmol/L | 1.76 (1.47, 2.17) | 1.99 (1.55, 2.25) | 1.67 (1.43, 2.1) | 1.62 (1.26, 2.05) | 0.54 |
| Coagulation Tests | |||||
| PT, s | 11.10 (10.70, 11.90) | 11.00(10.50, 11.60) | 11.40(10.80, 12.00) | 11.30(11.00, 12.30) | 0.053 |
| APTT, s | 28.20 (26.40, 30.80) | 28.10(25.60, 30.10) | 27.70(26.00, 32.50) | 28.60(26.95, 31.40) | 0.330 |
| FIB, g/L | 2.58 (2.19, 3.08) | 2.46 (2.21, 3.08) | 2.89 (2.44, 3.16) | 2.39 (1.88, 2.79) | 0.011 |
| INR | 0.96 (0.92, 1.03) | 0.95 (0.90, 1.00) | 0.98 (0.95, 1.02) | 0.97 (0.94, 1.06) | 0.027 |
| D-dimer, mg/L | 0.23 (0.10, 0.40) | 0.24(0.14, 0.41) | 0.26(0.10, 0.67) | 0.18(0.10, 0.27) | 0.075 |
| PLT Characteristics | |||||
| PLT numbers, 109/L | 208.33±54.57 | 209.55±55.56 | 204.81±48.37 | 209.33±59.14 | 0.930 |
| MPV, fl | 10.50 (9.90, 11.10) | 10.40(9.70, 11.00) | 10.70(10.10, 11.60) | 10.30(9.90, 10.80) | 0.254 |
| PDW, fl | 12.30 (11.00, 13.60) | 12.30(10.60, 13.30) | 12.80 (11.10, 14.10) | 11.90 (10.90, 13.30) | 0.333 |
| PCT, % | 0.22±0.05 | 0.22±0.05 | 0.22±0.05 | 0.22±0.05 | 0.982 |
| P-LCR, % | 28.50(23.30, 33.80) | 28.30(21.60, 33.30) | 30.70(25.00, 38.70) | 26.80(23.45, 32.35) | 0.267 |
Notes: Data were expressed as mean ± SD, n (%) or median (interquartile range), unless noted otherwise. aBased on angiography diagnosis.
Abbreviations: ACS, acute coronary syndrome; APTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; CAG, coronary angiography; FIB, fibrinogen concentration; INR, international normalized ratio; LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MPV, mean platelet volume; PCT, platelet-crit; PDW, platelet distribution width; P-LCR, platelet-to-large cell ratio; PLT, platelet; PT, prothrombin time.
Occurrence of ISR Within 3–18 Months from Last Stenting in Patients Stratified by CYP2C19 Genotype and Clopidogrel Dose
| Patient Group, n (%) | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EM | IM75 | IM150 | ||
| No ISR | 45 (88.2%) | 16 (59.3%) | 31 (93.9%) | 92(82.9%) |
| ISR | 6 (11.8%) | 11 (40.7%) | 2 (6.1%) | 19(17.1%) |
| Total | 51 (100%) | 27 (100%) | 33 (100%) | 111 |
Notes: EM, no CYP2C19 LOF allele and treated with 75 mg clopidogrel each day; IM75, one LOF allele and treated with 75 mg clopidogrel each day; IM150, one LOF allele and treated with 150 mg clopidogrel each day; and ISR, in-stent restenosis.
Figure 1Analysis of ISR rates. Risks of ISR at 3–18 months after stenting were analyzed and compared among the patients without CYP2C19 LOF alleles treated with 75 mg clopidogrel daily (EM), and the patients with one LOF allele treated with 75 mg (IM75) or 150 mg (IM150) clopidogrel each day.
Uni- and Multivariate Regression Analysis to Identify Predictors for ISR Within 3–18 Months Post-Stenting
| Univariate Analysis | Multivariate Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Genotype (EM or IM) × clopidogrel dose (75 or 150 mg/d) | 2.553 (1.507–4.326) | 0.0004 | ||
| Genotype (EM or IM) | 2.074 (0.726–5.929) | 0.173 | 5.063 (1.610–15.921) | 0.006 |
| Clopidogrel dose (75 or 150 mg/d) | 0.285 (0.031 −2.59) | 0.265 | 10.748(2.128–54.297) | 0.004 |
| IM75 vs IM150 | – | – | 10.656 (2.103–54.006) | 0.004 |
| EM vs IM150 | – | – | 2.067 (0.391–10.917) | 0.393 |
Notes: Genotype (EM or IM) × clopidogrel dose (75 or 150 mg/d), interaction of genotype (EM or IM) and clopidogrel dose (75 or 150 mg/d); CABG, coronary artery bypass graft; EM, no CYP2C19 LOF allele; IM, one CYP2C19 LOF allele; IM75, one LOF allele and treated with 75 mg clopidogrel each day; IM150, one LOF allele and treated with 150 mg clopidogrel each day.