Literature DB >> 18482659

Cytochrome P450 2C19 681G>A polymorphism and high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity associated with adverse 1-year clinical outcome of elective percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting or bare-metal stents.

Dietmar Trenk1, Willibald Hochholzer, Martin F Fromm, Ligia-Emilia Chialda, Andreas Pahl, Christian M Valina, Christian Stratz, Peter Schmiebusch, Hans-Peter Bestehorn, Heinz Joachim Büttner, Franz-Josef Neumann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether the loss of function CYP2C19 681G>A *2 polymorphism is associated with high (>14%) residual platelet aggregation (RPA) on clopidogrel and whether high on-clopidogrel RPA impacts clinical outcome after elective coronary stent placement.
BACKGROUND: The cytochrome P450 (CYP)-dependent conversion of clopidogrel to its active metabolite may contribute to the variability in antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel.
METHODS: The study included 797 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, who were followed-up for 1 year. Adenosine-diphosphate-induced (5 mumol/l) RPA was assessed after a 600-mg loading dose and after the first 75-mg maintenance dose of clopidogrel before discharge. CYP2C19 genotype was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction.
RESULTS: Of the patients included, 552 (69.3%) were CYP2C19 wild-type homozygotes (*1/*1) and 245 (30.7%) carried at least one *2 allele. Residual platelet aggregation at baseline did not differ significantly between genotypes. On clopidogrel, RPA was significantly (p < 0.001) higher in *2 carriers than in wild-type homozygotes (23.0% [interquartile range (IQR) 8.0% to 38.0%] vs. 11.0% [IQR 3.0% to 28.0%] after loading; 11.0% [IQR 5.0% to 22.0%] vs. 7.0% [IQR 3.0% to 14.0%] at pre-discharge). Between *2 carriers and wild-type homozygotes, we found significant (p < 0.001) differences in the proportion of patients with RPA >14%, both after loading (62.4% vs. 43.4%) and at pre-discharge (41.3% vs. 22.5%). Residual platelet aggregation >14% at pre-discharge incurred a 3.0-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.4 to 6.8; p = 0.004) in the 1-year incidence of death and myocardial infarction.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients carrying at least one CYP2C19*2 allele are more prone to high-on clopidogrel platelet reactivity, which is associated with poor clinical outcome after coronary stent placement (Effect of Clopidogrel Loading and Risk of PCI [EXCELSIOR]; NCT00457236).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18482659     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.12.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  128 in total

1.  Mapping genes that predict treatment outcome in admixed populations.

Authors:  T M Baye; R A Wilke
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 3.550

2.  A sensitive and rapid ultra HPLC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous detection of clopidogrel and its derivatized active thiol metabolite in human plasma.

Authors:  Cody J Peer; Shawn D Spencer; Dustin A H VanDenBerg; Michael A Pacanowski; Richard B Horenstein; William D Figg
Journal:  J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci       Date:  2011-11-26       Impact factor: 3.205

3.  Correlation of high post-treatment platelet reactivity assessed by light transmittance aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay.

Authors:  In-Suk Kim; Young-Hoon Jeong; Min-Kyung Kang; Jin-Sin Koh; Yongwhi Park; Seok-Jae Hwang; Choong Hwan Kwak; Jin-Yong Hwang; Sunjoo Kim
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 4.  Implications of pharmacogenetic testing for patients taking warfarin or clopidogrel.

Authors:  Megan M Donohue; David L Tirschwell
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 5.  Personalized vascular medicine: individualizing drug therapy.

Authors:  Emil M Degoma; Giovanni Rivera; Scott M Lilly; M Haris U Usman; Emile R Mohler
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.239

Review 6.  Personalized approaches to clopidogrel therapy: are we there yet?

Authors:  Christopher D Anderson; Alessandro Biffi; Steven M Greenberg; Jonathan Rosand
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Which antiplatelet agent for whom? Which patient populations benefit most from novel antiplatelet agents (ticagrelor, prasugrel)?

Authors:  Christoph Varenhorst; Stefan James
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Clopidogrel utilization in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes mellitus: should we determine CYP2C19*2 genotype?

Authors:  Saoussen Chouchene; Rym Dabboubi; Haythem Raddaoui; Hela Abroug; Khaldoun Ben Hamda; Sondess Hadj Fredj; Fatma Abderrazak; Mayssa Gaaloul; Marwa Rezek; Fadoua Neffeti; Ilhem Hellara; Mouna Sassi; Linda Khefacha; Asma Sriha; Semir Nouira; Mohamed Fadhel Najjar; Faouzi Maatouk; Taieb Messaoud; Mohsen Hassine
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.953

9.  Evaluation of CYP2C19, P2Y12, and ABCB1 polymorphisms and phenotypic response to clopidogrel in healthy Indian adults.

Authors:  Kannan Sridharan; Rachna Kataria; Drishti Tolani; Shital Bendkhale; Nithya J Gogtay; Urmila M Thatte
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.200

Review 10.  Monitoring aspirin and clopidogrel response: testing controversies and recommendations.

Authors:  Athanasios Karathanos; Tobias Geisler
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.074

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.