Literature DB >> 32108553

A Compositional Neural Architecture for Language.

Andrea E Martin1,2.   

Abstract

Hierarchical structure and compositionality imbue human language with unparalleled expressive power and set it apart from other perception-action systems. However, neither formal nor neurobiological models account for how these defining computational properties might arise in a physiological system. I attempt to reconcile hierarchy and compositionality with principles from cell assembly computation in neuroscience; the result is an emerging theory of how the brain could convert distributed perceptual representations into hierarchical structures across multiple timescales while representing interpretable incremental stages of (de)compositional meaning. The model's architecture-a multidimensional coordinate system based on neurophysiological models of sensory processing-proposes that a manifold of neural trajectories encodes sensory, motor, and abstract linguistic states. Gain modulation, including inhibition, tunes the path in the manifold in accordance with behavior and is how latent structure is inferred. As a consequence, predictive information about upcoming sensory input during production and comprehension is available without a separate operation. The proposed processing mechanism is synthesized from current models of neural entrainment to speech, concepts from systems neuroscience and category theory, and a symbolic-connectionist computational model that uses time and rhythm to structure information. I build on evidence from cognitive neuroscience and computational modeling that suggests a formal and mechanistic alignment between structure building and neural oscillations, and moves toward unifying basic insights from linguistics and psycholinguistics with the currency of neural computation.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32108553     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  9 in total

1.  Entrainment revisited: a commentary on.

Authors:  Saskia Haegens
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.331

2.  Neural dynamics differentially encode phrases and sentences during spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Fan Bai; Antje S Meyer; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 9.593

3.  Neural tracking of phrases in spoken language comprehension is automatic and task-dependent.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Sara Carta; Greta Kaufeld; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 8.713

4.  An oscillating computational model can track pseudo-rhythmic speech by using linguistic predictions.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 8.140

5.  Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.

Authors:  Greta Kaufeld; Hans Rutger Bosker; Sanne Ten Oever; Phillip M Alday; Antje S Meyer; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Iris van Rooij; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06

7.  Commentary: A Compositional Neural Architecture for Language.

Authors:  Elliot Murphy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-09-02

8.  Inferring the nature of linguistic computations in the brain.

Authors:  Sanne Ten Oever; Karthikeya Kaushik; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.779

9.  Disentangling Semantic Composition and Semantic Association in the Left Temporal Lobe.

Authors:  Jixing Li; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.