Literature DB >> 32107752

Preclinical Assessment of the Analgesic Pharmacology of NKTR-181 in Rodents.

Caroline M Kopruszinski1, Juliana Swiokla1, Yeon Sun Lee1, Edita Navratilova1, Laurie VanderVeen2, Miao Yang2, Yi Liu2, Takahiro Miyazaki2, William K Schmidt3, Jonathan Zalevsky2, Frank Porreca4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pharmacological evaluation of the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist properties of NKTR-181 in rodent models.
METHODS: Graded noxious stimulus intensities were used in rats to establish the antinociceptive potency and efficacy of NKTR-181 relative to morphine, fentanyl, and oxycodone. Characteristics of MOR agonist actions, as measured by antinociceptive tolerance and cross-tolerance, as well as opioid-induced hyperalgesia (OIH) and naloxone-precipitated withdrawal in NKTR-181- and morphine-dependent in mice, were compared.
RESULTS: NKTR-181 showed dose- and time-related antinociception with similar maximal effects to morphine in the rat and mouse hot-water tail-flick test. No sex or species differences were observed in NKTR-181 or morphine antinociception. Rats treated with NKTR-181 and morphine exhibited decreases in both potency and maximal efficacy as nociceptive stimulus intensity was increased from a water temperature of 50 °C to 54 °C. Evaluation of antinociception at a high stimulus intensity revealed that oxycodone and fentanyl exhibited greater efficacy than either NKTR-181 or morphine. The relative potency difference between NKTR-181 and morphine across all tail-flick studies was determined to be 7.6-fold (90% confidence interval, 2.6, 21.5). The peak antinociceptive effect of NKTR-181 was delayed compared to that of the other opioids and cumulative drug effects were not observed. Repeated treatment with escalating, approximately equi-analgesic doses of NKTR-181 or morphine, produced antinociceptive tolerance and cross-tolerance. Under these pharmacological conditions, OIH and naloxone-precipitated physical dependence were similar for NKTR-181 and morphine.
CONCLUSIONS: NKTR-181 had a slower onset, but similar efficacy, to morphine in the models studied supporting reduced abuse potential while maintaining analgesic effect in comparison with current opioids.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antinociception; Efficacy; Mice; NKTR-181; Opioid; Potency; Rats

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32107752     DOI: 10.1007/s10571-020-00816-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol        ISSN: 0272-4340            Impact factor:   5.046


  41 in total

Review 1.  Opioid-induced hyperalgesia: a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Martin S Angst; J David Clark
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 2.  Understanding Links among Opioid Use, Overdose, and Suicide.

Authors:  Amy S B Bohnert; Mark A Ilgen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-01-03       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Relationship between Nonmedical Prescription-Opioid Use and Heroin Use.

Authors:  Wilson M Compton; Christopher M Jones; Grant T Baldwin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Morphine analgesic tolerance in 129P3/J and 129S6/SvEv mice.

Authors:  Camron D Bryant; Kristofer W Roberts; Janet S Byun; Michael S Fanselow; Christopher J Evans
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Effect of intravenous injection speed on responses to cocaine and hydromorphone in humans.

Authors:  M E Abreu; G E Bigelow; L Fleisher; S L Walsh
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 6.  Designing Safer Analgesics via μ-Opioid Receptor Pathways.

Authors:  H C Stephen Chan; Dillon McCarthy; Jianing Li; Krzysztof Palczewski; Shuguang Yuan
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2017-09-19       Impact factor: 14.819

7.  Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw.

Authors:  S R Chaplan; F W Bach; J W Pogrel; J M Chung; T L Yaksh
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.390

8.  Relationship between rate of infusion and reinforcing strength of oxycodone in humans.

Authors:  Sandra D Comer; Judy B Ashworth; Maria A Sullivan; Suzanne K Vosburg; Phillip A Saccone; Richard W Foltin
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug

9.  Naloxegol: First oral peripherally acting mu opioid receptor antagonists for opioid-induced constipation.

Authors:  Tejus Anantharamu; Sushil Sharma; Ajay Kumar Gupta; Navdeep Dahiya; Dick B Singh Brashier; Ashok Kumar Sharma
Journal:  J Pharmacol Pharmacother       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

10.  Postsurgical prescriptions for opioid naive patients and association with overdose and misuse: retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Gabriel A Brat; Denis Agniel; Andrew Beam; Brian Yorkgitis; Mark Bicket; Mark Homer; Kathe P Fox; Daniel B Knecht; Cheryl N McMahill-Walraven; Nathan Palmer; Isaac Kohane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2018-01-17
View more
  3 in total

1.  Understanding Opioid Actions, Pain and Analgesia: A Tribute to Dr. Gavril Pasternak.

Authors:  Kelly M Standifer; Charles E Inturrisi; Kathleen M Foley; Ying-Xian Pan
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 5.046

2.  In vivo and in vitro Characterization of a Partial Mu Opioid Receptor Agonist, NKTR-181, Supports Future Therapeutic Development.

Authors:  Alex S Lee; Suchi Tiwari; Isabel Bishop; Vartan Matossian; Nicole Romaneschi; Takahiro Miyazaki; Laurie VanderVeen; Jonathan Zalevsky; Kathryn DeFea; Catherine M Cahill; Wendy M Walwyn
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-23

Review 3.  Oxycodone in the Opioid Epidemic: High 'Liking', 'Wanting', and Abuse Liability.

Authors:  Cherkaouia Kibaly; Jacob A Alderete; Steven H Liu; Hazem S Nasef; Ping-Yee Law; Christopher J Evans; Catherine M Cahill
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.231

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.