| Literature DB >> 32106658 |
Keun Hong Song1, Jun Sik Woo1, Ju Ri Kim1, Gyeong Lim Ryu1, Youl Chang Baek2, Young Kyoon Oh2, Wan Sup Kwak3, Keun Kyu Park1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to evaluate nutritional value and in situ degradability of fruit-vegetable byproducts and their feeding effects on performance of growing Hanwoo steers.Entities:
Keywords: Beef Cattle; Fruit Byproduct; Performance; Steer; Total Mixed Ration (TMR); Vegetable Byproduct
Year: 2020 PMID: 32106658 PMCID: PMC7206375 DOI: 10.5713/ajas.19.0743
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian-Australas J Anim Sci ISSN: 1011-2367 Impact factor: 2.509
Formula of experimental TMR diets for growing Hanwoo steers (%)
| Items | Control | FV-B | CA-B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Corn flake | 18.6 | 18 | 20 |
| Fruit-vegetable byproduct | - | 20 | - |
| Chinese cabbage peel | - | - | 15 |
| Cabbage peel | - | - | 15 |
| Rice bran | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Perilla meal | 7 | 7 | 6 |
| Lupine | 5 | 6 | 5.4 |
| Wheat bran | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Alfalfa | 10 | 10 | 10 |
| Timothy | 17.8 | 17 | 17 |
| Water | 27 | 10.4 | - |
| Vitamin-mineral mix | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Limestone | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Salt | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| Total | 100 | 100 | 100 |
TMR, total mixed rations (as fed basis).
Control, 0% of fruit or vegetable byproduct in TMR; FV-B, 20% of fruit-vegetable byproducts including various types of fruits and vegetables (orange, apple, tomatoes, onion, bok choy, bell pepper, etc.) in TMR; CA-B, 30% of byproducts including Chinese cabbage peels (15%) and cabbage peels (15%) in TMR.
Chemical composition of experimental TMR diets (DM basis, %)
| Items | Control | FV-B | CA-B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dry matter | 63.81 | 64.39 | 66.20 |
| Crude protein | 16.37 | 17.22 | 16.32 |
| Ether extract | 5.83 | 6.17 | 5.30 |
| Ash | 8.08 | 8.00 | 8.49 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 40.82 | 38.08 | 39.75 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 24.35 | 22.91 | 22.76 |
| Acid detergent lignin | 5.52 | 5.36 | 5.31 |
| Neutral detergent insoluble crude protein | 4.55 | 4.34 | 4.35 |
| Acid detergent insoluble crude protein | 1.25 | 1.05 | 1.13 |
| Total digestible nutrients | 72.08 | 73.41 | 71.77 |
TMR, total mixed rations (as fed basis).
Control, 0% of fruit or vegetable byproduct in TMR; FV-B, 20% of fruit-vegetable byproducts including various types of fruits and vegetables (orange, apple, tomatoes, onion, bok choy, bell pepper, etc.) in TMR; CA-B, 30% of byproducts including Chinese cabbage peels (15%) and cabbage peels (15%) in TMR.
Chemical composition of byproducts (DM basis, %)
| Items | Cabbage byproduct | Chinese cabbage byproduct | Fruit-vegetable byproduct | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Dry matter | 9.60 | 0.74 | 6.25 | 0.83 | 14.81 | 0.49 |
| Crude protein | 18.69 | 0.53 | 20.20 | 0.60 | 10.07 | 0.33 |
| Ether extract | 2.11 | 0.17 | 2.04 | 0.81 | 2.63 | 0.26 |
| Crude fiber | 13.51 | 1.42 | 13.80 | 1.49 | 7.59 | 0.42 |
| Ash | 13.67 | 0.87 | 29.15 | 3.85 | 6.65 | 0.36 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 22.31 | 4.67 | 28.83 | 3.61 | 13.94 | 3.24 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 15.73 | 3.26 | 17.73 | 4.29 | 12.14 | 0.74 |
| Acid detergent lignin | 1.90 | 0.91 | 4.63 | 1.47 | 4.62 | 0.40 |
| Neutral detergent insoluble crude protein | 2.85 | 1.01 | 4.59 | 1.12 | - | - |
| Acid detergent insoluble crude protein | 0.96 | 0.16 | 1.19 | 0.14 | - | - |
| Non-fiber carbohydrate | 44.93 | 5.09 | 24.69 | 4.88 | 66.72 | 3.28 |
| Total digestible nutrient | 73.30 | 2.62 | 53.53 | 5.56 | 79.53 | 0.89 |
DM, dry matter; SD, standard deviation of samples.
Cabbage and Chinese cabbage byproducts mainly contain outer peels of the vegetable (n = 7) and fruit-vegetable byproduct contains byproduct from various types of fruits and vegetables (n = 7).
In situ rumen DM degradability and ED of byproducts (%)
| Items | Cabbage byproduct | Chinese cabbage byproduct | Fruit-vegetable byproduct | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | ||||
| 0 | 32.64 | 33.34 | 42.25 | 0.69 |
| 4 | 51.48 | 49.97 | 68.35 | 1.97 |
| 8 | 56.43 | 51.15 | 74.03 | 1.14 |
| 12 | 58.10 | 53.56 | 81.58 | 1.35 |
| 24 | 78.36 | 83.05 | 92.72 | 1.68 |
| 48 | 95.03 | 90.29 | 95.61 | 0.42 |
| 72 | 93.62 | 90.99 | 95.79 | 0.46 |
| 96 | 92.54 | 90.99 | 95.01 | 0.40 |
| 120 | 91.08 | 90.01 | 96.10 | 0.65 |
| Degradation characteristics of DM and ED | ||||
| a | 34.47 | 26.32 | 50.20 | 1.33 |
| b | 56.61 | 63.90 | 45.24 | 1.03 |
| c | 0.060 | 0.076 | 0.129 | <0.01 |
| a+b | 91.08 | 90.22 | 95.44 | 0.63 |
| ED | 68.47 | 68.09 | 84.69 | 0.86 |
DM, dry matter; ED, effective degradability; SEM, standard error of means.
Cabbage and Chinese cabbage byproducts, mainly contain outer peels of the vegetable; Fruit-vegetable byproduct, contains byproduct from various types of fruits and vegetables.
a, rapidly degradable fraction (%); b, insoluble fraction but degraded over time in rumen (%); c, constant for b fraction in the exponential equation (fraction/h); a+b, potentially degradable fraction (%); ED (%), effective degradability calculated with outflow rates of 4%, t = 120 h.
Means within a row without a common superscript letter differ at p<0.05.
In situ rumen NDF degradability and ED of byproducts (%)
| Items | Cabbage byproduct | Chinese cabbage byproduct | FV-B | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | ||||
| 0 | 49.94 | 46.10 | 47.87 | 0.46 |
| 4 | 49.87 | 51.00 | 53.59 | 0.64 |
| 8 | 50.37 | 53.35 | 57.06 | 0.64 |
| 12 | 52.22 | 56.52 | 58.46 | 0.56 |
| 24 | 64.38 | 65.01 | 70.01 | 1.43 |
| 48 | 67.85 | 66.05 | 86.34 | 0.71 |
| 72 | 65.19 | 64.76 | 90.55 | 0.47 |
| 96 | 66.08 | 66.74 | 89.23 | 0.65 |
| 120 | 65.63 | 66.42 | 91.52 | 0.38 |
| Degradation characteristics of NDF and ED | ||||
| a | 48.72 | 47.35 | 75.18 | 1.11 |
| b | 16.91 | 19.07 | 16.34 | 1.02 |
| c | 0.030 | 0.025 | 0.072 | 0.01 |
| a+b | 65.63 | 66.42 | 91.52 | 0.38 |
| ED | 55.97 | 54.22 | 85.62 | 0.78 |
NDF, neutral detergent fiber; ED, effective degradability; SEM, standard error of means.
Cabbage and Chinese cabbage byproducts mainly contain outer peels of the vegetable (n = 7) and fruit-vegetable byproduct contains byproduct from various types of fruits and vegetables (n = 7).
a, rapidly degradable fraction (%); b, insoluble fraction but degraded over time in rumen (%); c, constant for b fraction in the exponential equation (fraction/h); a+b, potentially degradable fraction (%); ED (%), effective degradability calculated with outflow rates of 4%, t = 120 h.
Means within a row without a common superscript letter differ at p<0.05.
Effects of feeding byproducts on performance in growing Hanwoo steers
| Items | Treatments | SEM | p-value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| Control | FV-B | CA-B | |||
| BW (kg) | |||||
| 0 wk | 288.8 | 310.9 | 282.1 | 23.044 | 0.068 |
| 4th wk | 335.0 | 357.9 | 331.6 | 24.629 | 0.109 |
| 8th wk | 370.7 | 392.0 | 359.6 | 23.749 | 0.154 |
| 12th wk | 399.2 | 411.6 | 389.9 | 24.954 | 0.399 |
| DMI (kg/d) | |||||
| 1st period | 6.90 | 7.67 | 7.41 | 0.562 | 0.382 |
| 2nd period | 7.16 | 7.61 | 7.23 | 0.674 | 0.481 |
| 3rd period | 7.25 | 7.81 | 7.28 | 0.531 | 0.071 |
| Whole period | 7.06 | 7.63 | 7.15 | 0.585 | 0.180 |
| ADG (kg/d) | |||||
| 1st period | 1.74 | 1.60 | 1.69 | 0.149 | 0.803 |
| 2nd period | 1.15 | 1.28 | 1.04 | 0.076 | 0.152 |
| 3rd period | 0.87 | 0.96 | 1.27 | 0.156 | 0.283 |
| Whole period | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.34 | 0.122 | 0.859 |
| FCR (F/G) | |||||
| 1st period | 4.17 | 5.02 | 4.47 | 0.560 | 0.553 |
| 2nd period | 6.47 | 6.11 | 7.46 | 0.756 | 0.464 |
| 3rd period | 8.50 | 7.97 | 7.48 | 1.288 | 0.859 |
| Whole period | 5.87 | 6.36 | 5.80 | 0.760 | 0.756 |
SEM, standard error of means; BW, body weight; DMI, dry matter intake; ADG, average daily gain; FCR, feed conversion ratio.
Control, byproduct 0%; FV-B, fruit-vegetable byproducts 20%; CA-B, Chinese cabbage and cabbage byproducts 30%.
1st period (0 to 4 wk); 2nd period (5 to 8 wk); 3rd period (9 to 12 wk); whole period (0 to 12 wk).
In situ rumen DM degradability and ED of TMR diets (%)
| Items | Control | FV-B | CA-B | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | ||||
| 0 | 31.03 | 32.77 | 31.69 | 0.61 |
| 4 | 36.77 | 37.47 | 37.24 | 0.44 |
| 8 | 40.59 | 41.31 | 39.78 | 0.71 |
| 12 | 53.66 | 52.14 | 54.39 | 1.77 |
| 24 | 69.85 | 70.46 | 68.67 | 1.90 |
| 48 | 80.68 | 81.02 | 80.11 | 0.87 |
| 72 | 82.54 | 82.34 | 82.70 | 0.84 |
| 96 | 83.14 | 83.68 | 83.18 | 0.57 |
| 120 | 85.82 | 86.06 | 85.19 | 0.30 |
| Degradation characteristics of DM and ED | ||||
| a | 38.02 | 38.32 | 35.93 | 0.45 |
| b | 47.81 | 47.75 | 49.26 | 0.57 |
| c | 0.035 | 0.035 | 0.038 | 0.01 |
| a+b | 85.83 | 86.07 | 85.19 | 0.38 |
| ED | 60.26 | 60.69 | 59.90 | 0.78 |
DM, dry matter; ED, effective degradability; TMR, total mixed ration; SEM, standard error of means.
Control, byproduct 0%; FV-B, fruit-vegetable byproducts 20%; CA-B, Chinese cabbage and cabbage byproducts 30%.
a, rapidly degradable fraction (%); b, insoluble fraction but degraded over time in rumen (%); c, constant for b fraction in the exponential equation (fraction/h); a+b, potentially degradable fraction (%); ED (%), effective degradability calculated with outflow rates of 4%, t = 120 h.
In situ rumen NDF degradability of TMR diets (%)
| Items | Control | FV-B | CA-B | SEM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time (h) | ||||
| 0 | 56.40 | 58.94 | 62.84 | 1.44 |
| 4 | 60.43 | 62.37 | 63.98 | 1.72 |
| 8 | 63.78 | 63.96 | 65.23 | 1.68 |
| 12 | 65.17 | 65.45 | 68.25 | 0.98 |
| 24 | 71.45 | 70.11 | 70.35 | 1.68 |
| 48 | 84.05 | 82.71 | 83.40 | 0.96 |
| 72 | 84.71 | 84.10 | 83.49 | 0.73 |
| 96 | 85.60 | 83.84 | 86.29 | 0.42 |
| 120 | 84.60 | 84.27 | 85.51 | 1.16 |
| Degradation characteristics of NDF and ED | ||||
| a | 56.91 | 58.58 | 60.02 | 1.34 |
| b | 27.68 | 25.69 | 25.49 | 1.35 |
| c | 0.032 | 0.036 | 0.044 | 0.01 |
| a+b | 84.60 | 84.27 | 85.51 | 1.16 |
| ED | 69.00 | 70.78 | 72.81 | 1.11 |
NDF, neutral detergent fiber; TMR, total mixed ration; SEM, standard error of means; ED, effective degradability.
Control (Byproduct 0%); FV-B (Fruit-vegetable byproducts 20%); CA-B (Chinese cabbage and cabbage byproducts 30%); SEM, standard error of means.
a, rapidly degradable fraction (%); b, insoluble fraction but degraded over time in rumen (%); c, constant for b fraction in the exponential equation (fraction/h); a+b, potentially degradable fraction (%); ED (%), effective degradability calculated with outflow rates of 4%, t = 120 h.