| Literature DB >> 32104463 |
Pan Guo1,2, Nan Li1,2, Lili Fan1,2, Jun Lu3, Boying Liu1,2, Bing Zhang1,2, Yumei Wu1,2, Zhidong Liu1,2, Jiawei Li2, Jiaxin Pi1,2, Dongli Qi1,2.
Abstract
Labrasol, as a non-ionic surfactant, can enhance the permeation and absorption of drugs, and is extensively used in topical, transdermal, and oral pharmaceutical preparations as an emulsifier and absorption enhancer. Recent studies in our laboratory have indicated that labrasol has a strong absorption enhancing effect on different types of drugs in vitro and in vivo. This study was performed to further elucidate the action mechanism of labrasol on the corneal penetration. In this research, the fluorescein sodium, a marker of passive paracellular transport of tight junction, was selected as the model drug to assess the effect of labrasol on in vitro corneal permeability. To investigate the continuous and real-time influence of labrasol on the membrane permeability and integrity, the Ussing chamber system was applied to monitor the electrophysiological parameters. And, furthermore, we elucidated the effect of labrasol on excised cornea at the molecular level by application of RT-PCR, Western blot, and immunohistochemical staining. The results indicated that labrasol obviously enhance the transcorneal permeability of fluorescein sodium, and the enhancement was realized by interacting with and down-regulating the associated proteins, such as F-actin, claudin-1 and β-catenin, which were contributed to cell-cell connections, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: Enhanced corneal permeation; Immunohistochemistry; Labrasol; Tight junctions associated proteins; Ussing chamber; Western blot
Year: 2018 PMID: 32104463 PMCID: PMC7032126 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.05.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian J Pharm Sci ISSN: 1818-0876 Impact factor: 6.598
The Real-time PCR oligonucleotide primers.
| Primer name | Accession number | Primer | Sequence (5’−3’) | PCR product (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rabbit | NM_001082253.1 | Forward | ATCACTGCCACCCAGAAGAC | 146 |
| GAPDH | Reverse | GTGAGTTTCCCGTTCAGCTC | ||
| Rabbit | NM_001089316.1 | Forward | TGCATGGAAGATGATGAGGA | 186 |
| Claudin-1 | Reverse | GCCAGTGAAAAGAGCCTGAC | ||
| Rabbit | XM_008262318.1 | Forward | TGGGACAGAACCTACGGAAC | 134 |
| Occludin | Reverse | GGATCCGTGTAGCCTCCATA | ||
| Rabbit | XM_008269782.1 | Forward | GACTGATGCGAAGACGTTGA | 117 |
| ZO-1 | Reverse | GCAGAATGGATGCTGTCAGA | ||
| Rabbit | XM_008265032.1 | Forward | GAGCTTCATCAGCCCAAGAC | 125 |
| F-actin | Reverse | CATCACCCTTGCCAAGTTTT | ||
| Rabbit | XM_008264206.1 | Forward | GTAGGAAAGCCGAAGCACAG | 141 |
| JAM-A | Reverse | TCAGAGGGCTCTGTCCAGTT | ||
| Rabbit | XM_002713075.2 | Forward | CCCAGTTACCGTTCCTTTCA | 120 |
| β-catenin | Reverse | CAGCCCATCAACTGGGTAGT |
Preparation of SDS-PAGE gel.
| Separating gel (8%) | Stacking gel (5%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Volume | 15 ml | 6 ml |
| 40% acrylamide | 3 ml | 0.75 ml |
| Tris | 3.8 ml (1.5 M, pH 8.8) | 0.75 ml (0.5 M, pH 6.8) |
| 10% SDS | 0.15 ml | 0.06 ml |
| 10% AP | 0.15 ml | 0.06 ml |
| TEMED | 0.009 ml | 0.006 ml |
| ddH2O | 7.90 ml | 4.35 ml |
Fig. 1Effect of different concentrations of labrasol on the accumulative penetration amount of fluorescein sodium (mean ± SD, n = 6).
Effect of labrasol on the permeability of fluorescein sodium (mean ± SD, n = 6).
| groups | Accumulative penetrated amount (ng) | |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 13.74 ± 5.78 | 2.94 ± 1.54 |
| 0.5% Labrasol | 131.51 ± 42.93 | 41.12 ± 14.22 |
| 2.0% Labrasol | 230.34 ± 39.31 | 64.95 ± 9.44 |
| 8.0% Labrasol | 572.22 ± 75.65 | 146.14 ± 25.69 |
Notes:
P < 0.01 vs. Control
Fig. 2Effect of different concentrations of labrasol on the permeability of fluorescein sodium (mean ± SD, n = 6).
Fig. 3The effect of labrasol on electrical resistance of rabbit cornea. (A) Blank; (B) Control; (C) 0.5% labrasol; (D) 2% labrasol; (E) 8.0% labrasol; (F) 2% labrasol without fluorescein sodium (mean ± SD, n = 6).
The effect of labrasol on mRNA expression of tight junction associated proteins (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| groups | F-actin | β-catenin | JAM-1 | Claudin-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | 0.96 ± 0.14 | 1.03 ± 0.04 | 1.07 ± 0.16 | 1.07 ± 0.11 |
| Control | 1.11 ± 0.40 | 1.62 ± 0.23 | 1.27 ± 0.36 | 2.08 ± 0.65 |
| 0.5% Labrasol | 0.55 ± 0.18 | 1.97 ± 0.29 | 1.45 ± 0.13 | 1.43 ± 0.12 |
| 2.0% Labrasol | 0.10 ± 0.13 | 0.40 ± 023 | 1.71 ± 0.01 | 1.49 ± 0.29 |
| 8.0% Labrasol | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.04 | 1.71 ± 0.45 | 0.14 ± 0.04 |
Notes:
P < 0.05 vs. Blank.
P < 0.05, ⁎⁎P < 0.01 vs. Control.
Fig. 4The effect of labrasol on mRNA expression of tight junction associated proteins (Mean ± SD, n = 3).
Notes: #P < 0.05 vs. Blank; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. Control.
Fig. 5The effect of labrasol with different concentrations on expression of tight junction associated proteins.
Fig. 6The effect of labrasol on expression of tight junction associated proteins.
Notes: #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. Blank; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. Control.
The effect of labrasol on expression of tight junction associated proteins (mean ± SD, n = 3).
| Groups | F-actin/ | β-catenin/ | JAM-1/ | Claudin-1/ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blank | 0.94 ± 0.10 | 1.13 ± 0.17 | 1.03 ± 0.05 | 1.08 ± 0.14 |
| Control | 0.44 ± 0.07 | 2.07 ± 0.17 | 1.08 ± 0.03 | 1.70 ± 0.16 |
| 0.5% Labrasol | 0.56 ± 0.11 | 1.08 ± 0.10 | 1.20 ± 0.10 | 1.41 ± 0.10 |
| 2.0% Labrasol | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0.37 ± 0.01 | 1.17 ± 0.10 | 0.86 ± 0.05 |
| 8.0% Labrasol | 0.07 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 1.35 ± 0.21 | 1.00 ± 0.10 |
Notes:
P < 0.05, ##P < 0.05 vs. Blank.
P < 0.05, ⁎⁎P < 0.01 vs. Control.
Fig. 7Immunohistochemistry of F-actin, β-catenin and claudin-1 influenced by labrasol. (A) The effect of labrasol on F-actin expression (B)The effect of labrasol on β-catenin expression (C) The effect of labrasol on Claudin-1 expression.
Red: β-catenin, Blue: Nucleus, Scale bar: 200 µm. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)