| Literature DB >> 32104184 |
Masahito Kawabori1, Aki Tanimori1, Shinri Kitta1, Hideo Shichinohe1, Kiyohiro Houkin1.
Abstract
Cell therapy for central nervous system (CNS) disorders is beginning to prove its safety and efficiency. Intraparenchymal transplantation can be an option for cell delivery; however, one concern regarding this method is that the transplantation cannula may cause additional brain injuries. These include vessel damage, which results in brain hemorrhage, and clogging of the cannula by brain debris and/or cell clusters, which requires replacement of the cannula or forced injection causing jet flow of the cell suspension. We compared cannulas for cell delivery used in clinical trials, the Pittsburg and Mizuho cannulas, to a newly designed one, MK01, to assess their usability. MK01 has a spherical-shaped tip with a fan-like open orifice on the side of the cannula, which prevents vessel damage, clogging of brain debris, and jet flow phenomenon. We compared the extent of rat cervical and abdominal arterial damage with the cannula, the amount of debris in the cannula, the force needed to cause jet flow, and cell viability. While the viability of cells passed through the cannulas was almost the same among cannulas (approximately 95%), the Pittsburg cannula caused cervical arterial injury and subsequent hemorrhage, as it required a significantly smaller force to penetrate the arterial wall. Moreover, the Pittsburg cannula, but not the Mizuho and MK01 cannulas, showed high frequency of brain debris in the needle tip (approximately 80%) after brain puncture. While jet flow of the injection liquid was observed even when using smaller forces in the Pittsburg and Mizuho cannulas, MK01 constantly showed low jet flow occurrence. Thus, MK01 seems to be safer than the previously reported cannulas, although further investigation is necessary to validate its safety for clinical use.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32104184 PMCID: PMC7036105 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4085617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Basic characteristics of the cannulas.
| Outer diameter | Internal bore diameter | Internal volume | Flexibility | Injection hole | Shape of the tip | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pittsburg | Stainless steel | 890 mm | 250 mm | 20 mL | Yes | Tip | Narrowed with open tip |
| Mizuho | Stainless steel | 1500 mm | 300 mm | 23.9 | No | Side | Flattened |
| MK01 | Stainless steel | 1500 mm | 300 mm | 23.9 | No | Side | Spherical |
Figure 1Photograph of the MK01 cannula and of the shape of the open orifice. The distal side of the opening orifice is curved just proximal to the equator line of the spherical tip so that the opening orifice does not appear from the inserting trajectory view.
Figure 2Photographs of compressing the cervical artery using the Pittsburg cannula (a) and of massive hemorrhage after arterial vessel penetration (b). Graph showing the force needed to penetrate the abdominal arterial wall with each cannula (c). The Pittsburg cannula required a significantly smaller force to penetrate the artery compared with the Mizuho and MK01 cannulas.
Figure 3Amount of brain debris found in each cannula (a) and representative figure of the debris (b, arrow).
Figure 4Representative figures of the jet flow with each cannula (a, arrow) and the distance reached by saline (b) (†,§p < 0.05 vs. MK01). The force (N) needed to cause vertical jet flow (fountain) (c) (∗p < 0.05).
Figure 5Colored saline injected in the gel imitating the brain. The Pittsburg and Mizuho needles showed jet flow prominence (arrow) at 2000 μL/min (arrow), while MK01 did not cause protuberance.