Literature DB >> 16943402

A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Günther Deuschl1, Carmen Schade-Brittinger, Paul Krack, Jens Volkmann, Helmut Schäfer, Kai Bötzel, Christine Daniels, Angela Deutschländer, Ulrich Dillmann, Wilhelm Eisner, Doreen Gruber, Wolfgang Hamel, Jan Herzog, Rüdiger Hilker, Stephan Klebe, Manja Kloss, Jan Koy, Martin Krause, Andreas Kupsch, Delia Lorenz, Stefan Lorenzl, H Maximilian Mehdorn, Jean Richard Moringlane, Wolfgang Oertel, Marcus O Pinsker, Heinz Reichmann, Alexander Reuss, Gerd-Helge Schneider, Alfons Schnitzler, Ulrich Steude, Volker Sturm, Lars Timmermann, Volker Tronnier, Thomas Trottenberg, Lars Wojtecki, Elisabeth Wolf, Werner Poewe, Jürgen Voges.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus reduces levodopa-related motor complications in advanced Parkinson's disease. We compared this treatment plus medication with medical management.
METHODS: In this randomized-pairs trial, we enrolled 156 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and severe motor symptoms. The primary end points were the changes from baseline to six months in the quality of life, as assessed by the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), and the severity of symptoms without medication, according to the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, part III (UPDRS-III).
RESULTS: Pairwise comparisons showed that neurostimulation, as compared with medication alone, caused greater improvements from baseline to six months in the PDQ-39 (50 of 78 pairs, P=0.02) and the UPDRS-III (55 of 78, P<0.001), with mean improvements of 9.5 and 19.6 points, respectively. Neurostimulation resulted in improvements of 24 to 38 percent in the PDQ-39 subscales for mobility, activities of daily living, emotional well-being, stigma, and bodily discomfort. Serious adverse events were more common with neurostimulation than with medication alone (13 percent vs. 4 percent, P<0.04) and included a fatal intracerebral hemorrhage. The overall frequency of adverse events was higher in the medication group (64 percent vs. 50 percent, P=0.08).
CONCLUSIONS: In this six-month study of patients under 75 years of age with severe motor complications of Parkinson's disease, neurostimulation of the subthalamic nucleus was more effective than medical management alone. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00196911 [ClinicalTrials.gov].). Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943402     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa060281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  651 in total

1.  Parkinson disease: deep brain stimulation versus best medical therapy for PD.

Authors:  Matthew A Brodsky; John G Nutt
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 42.937

2.  Bilateral subthalamic stimulation for advanced Parkinson disease: early experience at an Eastern center.

Authors:  Shang-Ming Chiou; Yu-Chin Lin; Ming-Kuei Lu; Chon-Haw Tsai
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 3.  Cell replacement therapy is the remedial solution for treating Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Venkatesan Dhivya; Vellingiri Balachandar
Journal:  Stem Cell Investig       Date:  2017-06-30

Review 4.  Toward Electrophysiology-Based Intelligent Adaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for Movement Disorders.

Authors:  Andrea A Kühn; R Mark Richardson; Wolf-Julian Neumann; Robert S Turner; Benjamin Blankertz; Tom Mitchell
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 5.  Current Practice and the Future of Deep Brain Stimulation Therapy in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Leonardo Almeida; Wissam Deeb; Chauncey Spears; Enrico Opri; Rene Molina; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Aysegul Gunduz; Christopher W Hess; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Semin Neurol       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 3.420

6.  The effects of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus on heart rate variability in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Kang-Du Liu; Din-E Shan; Terry B J Kuo; Cheryl C H Yang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  STN vs. GPi Deep Brain Stimulation: Translating the Rematch into Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Nolan R Williams; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2014-04-01

8.  SELF ALIGNED TIP DEINSULATION OF ATOMIC LAYER DEPOSITED AL2O3 AND PARYLENE C COATED UTAH ELECTRODE ARRAY BASED NEURAL INTERFACES.

Authors:  Xianzong Xie; Loren Rieth; Sandeep Negi; Rajmohan Bhandari; Ryan Caldwell; Rohit Sharma; Prashant Tathireddy; Florian Solzbacher
Journal:  J Micromech Microeng       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 1.881

Review 9.  The role of the subthalamic nucleus in cognition.

Authors:  David B Weintraub; Kareem A Zaghloul
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.353

Review 10.  The Subthalamic Nucleus: Unravelling New Roles and Mechanisms in the Control of Action.

Authors:  Tora Bonnevie; Kareem A Zaghloul
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 7.519

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.