| Literature DB >> 32103052 |
Fei Ren1,2, Yuguang Zhang3, Hai Yu4, Yong An Zhang5.
Abstract
The popular medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lucidum (Fr.) Karst. [Ling Zhi] has been widely used for the general promotion of health and longevity in Asian countries. Continuous cultivation may affect soil microbe and soil properties. However, the effect of G. lucidum cultivation on related wood segments, soil and tree roots microbial communities and soil properties is remain unknown. In our study, the microbial communities of soils, wood segments, and tree roots before and after G. lucidum cultivation were investigated by Illumina Miseq sequencing of both ITS and 16S rDNA, and taxonomic composition of eukaryotic and prokaryotic microorganisms were observed. Indices of microbial richness, diversity and evenness significantly differed between before and after G. lucidum cultivation. Each of the investigated sampling type harbored a distinctive microbial community and differed remarkably before and after G. lucidum cultivation. Ascomycota and Basidiomycota (fungi), Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria (bacteria) showed significant differences after Ling Zhi cultivation. The soil property values also changed after cultivation. The redundancy analysis (RDA) showed that both the fungal and bacterial community structure significantly correlated with soil humus, pH, nitrogen, carbon and trace elements (Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu) contents. The results indicated that G. lucidum cultivation may have significant differed the associated microbial community structures and soil properties. The study will provide useful information for G. lucidum cultivation and under-forest economic development.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32103052 PMCID: PMC7044327 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-60362-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Richness, diversity and evenness indexes of microbial communities (mean ± SD).
| Samples | Microbe | Sobs (richness) | Invsimpson (diversity) | Simpsoneven (evenness) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | Fungi | 667.00 ± 5.39 | 26.54 ± 0.74 | 0.040 ± 0.004 |
| Bacteria | 2542.757 ± 30.37 | 94.617 ± 2.75 | 0.038 ± 0.005 | |
| LB | Fungi | 413.75 ± 31.80 | 12.85 ± 0.61 | 0.036 ± 0.002 |
| Bacteria | 3217.257 ± 60.54 | 275.387 ± 11.61 | 0.086 ± 0.003 | |
| MA | Fungi | 91.00 ± 4.08 | 3.38 ± 0.04 | 0.037 ± 0.001 |
| Bacteria | 1483.25 ± 38.40 | 14.94 ± 1.53 | 0.014 ± 0.001 | |
| MB | Fungi | 71.00 ± 6.73 | 1.61 ± 0.03 | 0.023 ± 0.002 |
| Bacteria | 679.00 ± 23.16 | 9.46 ± 1.00 | 0.011 ± 0.001 | |
| GA | Fungi | 336.50 ± 8.51 | 18.47 ± 0.10 | 0.015 ± 0.001 |
| Bacteria | 2169.25 ± 18.40 | 92.41 ± 4.43 | 0.044 ± 0.001 | |
| GB | Fungi | 388.00 ± 13.19 | 3.18 ± 0.05 | 0.008 ± 0.001 |
| Bacteria | 1903.25 ± 9.72 | 17.357 ± 0.47 | 0.009 ± 0.001 |
*LA– Soil after G. lucidum cultivation; LB– Soil before G. lucidum cultivation.
MA– Wood segments after G. lucidum cultivation; MB– Wood segments before G. lucidum cultivation.
GA– P. tabulaeformis roots of the sites after G. lucidum cultivation; GB– P. tabulaeformis roots of the sites before G. lucidum cultivation.
Figure 1Fungal abundance in different samples: (a) at phylum level; (b) at class level; and bacteria abundance in different samples: (c) at phylum level; (d) at class level.
Figure 2Fungal abundance in different samples: (a) at family level; (b) at genus level; bacterial abundance in different samples: (c) at family level; (d) at genus level.
Figure 3Venn diagram showing shared and unique (a) fungal; (b) bacterial OTUs in samples (soil, wood segments and tree roots before and after G. lucidum cultivation).
Figure 4Principal coordinates analysis (PCoA) based on the relative abundance of microbial OTUs showing different microbial community structure: (a) fungi; (b) bacteria.
The soil properties before and after G. lucidum cultivation.
| Soils properties | Before cultivation | After cultivation | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil C(g/kg) | 31.4(±0.30) | 48.5(±0.20) | 0.001 |
| Soil N(g/kg) | 2.42(±0.05) | 4.39(±0.02) | 0.001 |
| P (g/kg) | 0.527(±0.004) | 0.483(±0.02) | 0.08 |
| K (g/kg) | 21.4(±0.2) | 22.7(±0.20) | 0.10 |
| Na (g/kg) | 14.0(±0.10) | 14.7(±0.20) | 0.10 |
| Humus (g/kg) | 48.5(±0.20) | 30.4(±0.30) | 0.001 |
| Fe (mg/kg) | 186(±1.20) | 323(±1.50) | 0.001 |
| Zn (mg/kg) | 23.4(±0.20) | 61.7(±0.40) | 0.001 |
| Mn (mg/kg) | 74.1(±0.50) | 130(±0.60) | 0.001 |
| Cu (mg/kg) | 1.88(±0.02) | 2.47(±0.02) | 0.001 |
| pH | 5.2(±0.05) | 6.5(±0.04) | 0.002 |
Figure 5RDA plot showing the correlation between microbial community structure and soil properties: (a) fungi; (b) bacteria.