| Literature DB >> 32102537 |
Tarek Aboushousha1, Olfat Hammam1, Ahmed Aref2, Amira Kamel1, Mohamed Badawy3, Amr Abdel Hamid2.
Abstract
Bladder cancer represents a global health problem. It ranks ninth in worldwide cancer incidence. In Egypt, carcinoma of the bladder is the most prevalent cancer, Bladder cancer has the highest recurrence rate of any malignancy. Certainly, suitable molecular diagnostic markers are required to improve the early detection of bladder cancer and then to prolong survival of patients. The present study was aimed to explore the expression of CDk4 and STAT3 in bladder cancer tissues as prospective for target therapy. Our studied groups showed higher values of CDK4 and STAT3 expression in malignant tissues (SCC andUC collectively) compared to cystitis, however, significantly higher values of CDK4 and STAT3 expression were detected in UC group compared to SCC group. Urothelial carcinomas with papillary patterns showed lower parameters of CDK4 and STAT3 expression compared to the non-papillary variant, with significant differences. Higher grades of UC showed significantly higher parameters of CDK4 and STAT3 expression compared to low grade ones. Muscle invasion increases the level of CDK4 and STAT3 expression parameters, compared to non-muscle invasive UC.Entities:
Keywords: CDK4; STAT3; bladder cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32102537 PMCID: PMC7332140 DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.2.547
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Asian Pac J Cancer Prev ISSN: 1513-7368
Differences in CDK4 and STAT3 Percentage and Scores of Expression between Studied Groups
| Diagnosis | CDK4 percent | CDK4 score | STAT3 percent | STAT3 score | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cystitis (7) | Mean | 0 | 0 | 2.14 | 2.14 |
| SEM | 0 | 0 | 1.49 | 1.49 | |
| Uc (47) | Mean | 18.72* | 20.00* | 39.46** | 87.87** |
| SEM | 3.86 | 3.9 | 4.68 | 13.68 | |
| Scc (14) | Mean | 4.28^ | 4.28^ | 12.14^^ | 20.00^^ |
| SEM | 2.21 | 2.21 | 3.3 | 5.34 |
*, Significant difference with cases of cystitis (p<0.05); **, High significant difference with cases of cystitis (p<0.01); ^, Significant difference with cases of UC (p<0.05); ^^, High significant difference with cases of UC (p<0.01).
Histogram 1Differences in Cdk4 and STAT3 Expression Parameters
Comparison between Expression Parameters of CDK4 and STAT3 in Subgroups of Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) as Regards to Tumor Grade, Papillary Pattern, Muscle Invasion and Bilharzial Association
| Papillary pattern | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative | Mean | 25 | 25 | 66.87 | 163.12 |
| N | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| SEM | 8.8 | 8.8 | 6.63 | 24.32 | |
| positive | Mean | 15.48 | 17.41 | 25.32** | 49.03** |
| N | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | |
| SEM | 3.73 | 3.87 | 4.48 | 11.61 | |
| Grade( Low / High) | CDK4 percent | CDK4 score | STAT3 percent | STAT3 score | |
| high | Mean | 12 | 12 | 40.33 | 96.66 |
| N | 16 | 16 | 16 | 16 | |
| SEM | 4.82 | 4.82 | 6.54 | 19.25 | |
| low | Mean | 18.7 | 20.64 | 26.29 | 48.70* |
| N | 31 | 31 | 31 | 31 | |
| SEM | 3.95 | 4.03 | 4.3 | 10.48 | |
| Muscle invasion | |||||
| NMIBC | Mean | 19.09 | 20.9 | 27.72 | 50.3 |
| N | 33 | 33 | 33 | 33 | |
| SEM | 3.87 | 3.94 | 4.16 | 9.96 | |
| MIBC | Mean | 11.07 | 11.07 | 39.64 | 98.21 * |
| N | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | |
| SEM | 4.96 | 4.96 | 7 | 20.57 | |
| Bilharzial association | |||||
| Negative | Mean | 14.21 | 15.26 | 32.36 | 71.05 |
| N | 41 | 41 | 41 | 41 | |
| SEM | 3.8 | 3.87 | 5.05 | 14.23 | |
| positive | Mean | 11.81 | 11.81 | 17.72 | 34.09 |
| N | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | |
| SEM | 7.87 | 7.87 | 7.09 | 14.57 | |
*, Significant difference between comparable groups (p<0.05); **, High Significant difference between comparable groups (p<0.01)