Literature DB >> 32101916

Critical Realism and Realist Inquiry in Medical Education.

Rachel H Ellaway1, Amelia Kehoe, Jan Illing.   

Abstract

Understanding complex interventions, such as in medical education, requires a philosophy of science that can explain how and why things work, or fail to work, in different contexts. Critical realism and its operationalization in the form of realist inquiry provides this explanatory power. Ontologically, critical realism posits that the social world is real, that it exists independent of our knowledge of it, and that it is driven by causal mechanisms. However, unlike postpositivism, a realist epistemological position is that our understanding of the mechanisms that underlay social reality is limited and subjective. Critical realism is focused on understanding the mechanisms that drive social reality even when they are not directly observable. One of the most commonly used methodologies in the critical realist paradigm is realist inquiry, which focuses on the relationships between context, mechanisms, and outcomes. At its core, realist inquiry is concerned with "What works for whom, under what circumstances, how, and why?" To that end, realist inquiry explores the mechanisms that drive social systems and the ways in which these mechanisms work to develop explanatory theories of the phenomena under consideration. Although, compared with other approaches, realist inquiry is relatively new in medical education, the value of realist inquiry is in its ability to model how complex interventions function differently across multiple contexts, explaining what works, how it works, for whom, and in what contexts.

Year:  2020        PMID: 32101916     DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003232

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of the Interprofessional Clinical Learning Environment for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety From Perspectives of Interprofessional Teams.

Authors:  Mike K W Cheng; Sally Collins; Robert B Baron; Christy K Boscardin
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-14

2.  Introduction to the JGME Literature Review Series.

Authors:  Anna MacLeod; Robin Parker; Lara Varpio
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-12-14

3.  Rethinking implementation science for health professions education: A manifesto for change.

Authors:  Aliki Thomas; Rachel H Ellaway
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2021-11-10

4.  What Really Matters for Supervision Training Workshops? A Realist Evaluation.

Authors:  Van N B Nguyen; Charlotte E Rees; Ella Ottrey; Corinne Davis; Kirsty Pope; Sarah Lee; Susan Waller; Claire Palermo
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 7.840

5.  Student perspectives on programmatic assessment in a large medical programme: A critical realist analysis.

Authors:  Chris Roberts; Priya Khanna; Jane Bleasel; Stuart Lane; Annette Burgess; Kellie Charles; Rosa Howard; Deborah O'Mara; Inam Haq; Timothy Rutzou
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 7.647

6.  Integrating socially accountable health professional education and learning health systems to transform community health and health systems.

Authors:  Brianne Wood; Michael Fitzgerald; Claire Kendall; Erin Cameron
Journal:  Learn Health Syst       Date:  2021-06-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.