| Literature DB >> 32099393 |
Shanshan Ma1, Chang Liu1, Bo Li1, Tingting Zhang1, Li Jiang1, Rensheng Wang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transdermal drug delivery system has been researched for a long time because of its advantage in decreasing side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and gastrointestinal disturbance. Sonophoresis has been shown to be very effective in promoting the transdermal delivery of drugs. This study is on purpose to research the feasibility of sonophoresis promoting cisplatin in the treatment of cervical cancer and the optimum drug delivery mode.Entities:
Keywords: cervical cancer; cisplatin; sonophoresis; transdermal drug delivery
Year: 2020 PMID: 32099393 PMCID: PMC6996214 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S238126
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Figure 1(A) Weight change curve of nude mice (g) during intervention (n=8). (B) Tumor volume change curve of nude mice (g) during intervention (n=8). (C) Tumor weight of mice in the different groups on day 5 (n=8). (D) Representative tumors from mice in the different groups on day 5. ***P<0.001 versus the control group.
Figure 2(A) Chromatogram of cisplatin standards and representative chromatogram of each group. (B) Standard curve of DDTC-cisplatin. (C) Relative concentration of cisplatin in the different groups on day 5 (n=8). ***P<0.001 versus the control group.
Figure 3Histological images from the major organs of mice in the different groups on day 5. Tissues were collected from the tumor, skin, kidney and liver. Images were taken at ×400 magnification with standard hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining. The arrow indicated the areas of inflammatory cell infiltration.
Figure 4Representative TEM×1700 images of tumor, skin, kidney and liver in each group.
Figure 5(A) MPO expression in each group (n=8). (B) Caspase-3 expression in each group (n=8). (C) The results of TUNEL assay in each group (n=8). (D) PCNA expression in each group (n=8). *P<0.05, **P<0.01 and ***P<0.001versus the control group.
Scores of MPO, Caspase-3, TUNEL, PCNA in Different Groups (Mean ± SD, n=8 in Each Group)
| Control Group | 0.2 mg/mL | 0.4 mg/mL | 0.8 mg/mL | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MPO | 1.50±0.93a | 1.63±1.06 | 3.63±1.19 | 5.75±1.28 | 0.000* |
| Caspase-3 | 2.25±1.04b | 2.88±0.64 | 4.13±1.55 | 5.50±1.20 | 0.000* |
| TUNEL | 1.13±0.35c | 1.25±0.46 | 2.00±0.76 | 2.88±0.84 | 0.000* |
| PCNA | 2.75±0.46d | 2.38±0.52 | 1.88±0.35 | 1.25±0.46 | 0.000* |
Notes: *Statistically significant; aThere were statistical differences in control and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.001), control and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.001), 0.2 mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.4 mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P=0.001); bThere were statistical differences in control and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.003), control and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.039), 0.2 mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.4 mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P=0.024); cThere were statistical differences in control and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.01), control and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.025), 0.2 mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.4 mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P=0.01); dThere were statistical differences in control and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.001), control and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.2 mg/mL and 0.4 mg/mL group (P=0.036), 0.2mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P<0.001), 0.4 mg/mL and 0.8 mg/mL group (P=0.01).
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; n, number; mg, milligram; mL, milliliter.
Figure 6Representative immunohistochemical images of each factor in the different groups on day 5.
Figure 7Representative immunofluorescence images of each factor in the different groups on day 5.