Hannah Woopen1, R Richter2, R Chekerov2, G Inci2, S Alavi2, J P Grabowski2, J Sehouli2. 1. European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer (EKZE), Department of Gynecology, Charité - University Medicine of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany. hannah.woopen@charite.de. 2. European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer (EKZE), Department of Gynecology, Charité - University Medicine of Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the potential impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) on dose reductions, discontinuation of chemotherapy, and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was designed as individual participant data meta-analysis with the original study data of three phase II/III trials that were conducted by the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO) including 1213 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to estimate odds and hazard ratios after adjusting for age, ECOG, amount of delivered cycles, amount of recurrences, and amount of comedications and study. RESULTS: The majority of patients developed nausea (58.1%) and almost one third experienced vomiting (31.0%). CINV was not associated with FIGO stage, grading, histology, and number of recurrences. The necessity of dose reduction and discontinuation of chemotherapy did not correlate to nausea and vomiting (p = 0.88, p = 0.39 and p = 0.25, p = 0.54 respectively). Progression-free survival was shorter in patients with grade III/IV nausea and vomiting (p = 0.02; hazard ratio (HR) for grade III/IV nausea 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.20, and p = 0.02; HR for grade III/IV vomiting 1.67, 95% CI 1.15-2.42 respectively). CINV grade III/IV was also associated with poorer overall survival (p < 0.001; HR for grade III/IV nausea 2.35, 95% CI 1.64-3.37, and p < 0.001; HR for grade III/IV vomiting 1.67, 95% CI 1.15-2.42 respectively). CONCLUSION: CINV is significantly associated with poorer prognosis in recurrent ovarian cancer patients while there was no correlation found with the necessity of dose reduction and prior discontinuation of treatment. This study underlines the importance of prevention and treatment of CINV as part of early best supportive care.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the potential impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) on dose reductions, discontinuation of chemotherapy, and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was designed as individual participant data meta-analysis with the original study data of three phase II/III trials that were conducted by the North-Eastern German Society of Gynecological Oncology (NOGGO) including 1213 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to estimate odds and hazard ratios after adjusting for age, ECOG, amount of delivered cycles, amount of recurrences, and amount of comedications and study. RESULTS: The majority of patients developed nausea (58.1%) and almost one third experienced vomiting (31.0%). CINV was not associated with FIGO stage, grading, histology, and number of recurrences. The necessity of dose reduction and discontinuation of chemotherapy did not correlate to nausea and vomiting (p = 0.88, p = 0.39 and p = 0.25, p = 0.54 respectively). Progression-free survival was shorter in patients with grade III/IV nausea and vomiting (p = 0.02; hazard ratio (HR) for grade III/IV nausea 1.58, 95% CI 1.14-2.20, and p = 0.02; HR for grade III/IV vomiting 1.67, 95% CI 1.15-2.42 respectively). CINV grade III/IV was also associated with poorer overall survival (p < 0.001; HR for grade III/IV nausea 2.35, 95% CI 1.64-3.37, and p < 0.001; HR for grade III/IV vomiting 1.67, 95% CI 1.15-2.42 respectively). CONCLUSION: CINV is significantly associated with poorer prognosis in recurrent ovarian cancer patients while there was no correlation found with the necessity of dose reduction and prior discontinuation of treatment. This study underlines the importance of prevention and treatment of CINV as part of early best supportive care.
Authors: Margarita Majem; Ramon de Las Peñas; Juan Antonio Virizuela; Luís Cabezón-Gutiérrez; Patricia Cruz; Rafael Lopez-Castro; Miriam Méndez; Rebeca Mondéjar; María Del Mar Muñoz; Yolanda Escobar Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2022-03-26 Impact factor: 3.340
Authors: Austin L Brown; Kimberly P Raghubar; Olga A Taylor; Melanie Brooke Bernhardt; Lisa S Kahalley; Wei Pan; Philip J Lupo; Marilyn J Hockenberry; Michael E Scheurer Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-09-14 Impact factor: 3.603