Literature DB >> 32099376

The Relation Between Calcaneus Stiffness Index as a Measure of Bone Density and Body Mass Index in an Egyptian Cohort.

Khalid Ali1, Salma Ms El Said2, Nermien N Adly2, Samia A Abdul-Rahman2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obesity and osteoporosis are two conditions that are associated with morbidity and mortality; there is contradictory evidence regarding this association.
PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to explore further the association between obesity and calcaneus stiffness index (CSI), as a measure of bone density, in a community-based cross-sectional study in an Egyptian population.
METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among active subjects, aged ≥20 years old, over one year. CSI was measured by Quantitative ultrasound (QUS), in addition; QUS T-score and Z-score of the non-dominant heel scan were recorded.
RESULTS: Two hundred and eighty participants were recruited; 7 subjects were excluded because of Z score more than -2, mean age was 61 (± 11.9) years, and mean BMI was 29.7 (±5.6). Female participants were 77.7%, with mean of age 60.3 (± 11.6); and age range 20-82 years. Male participants were 22.3%, with mean of age 63.6 (± 12.7); and age range 30-80 years. Older subjects (>55 years) had significantly lower CSI and worse T-score than the younger subjects (P < 0.001 for both). In the younger age group, BMI was not significantly associated with CSI, even after adjustment for gender (P= 0.52). However, in the older age group, BMI was significantly associated with stiffness index (P= 0.049, O.R.= 1.73), even after adjustment for gender (P= 0.041, O.R.= 1.7).
CONCLUSION: Compared to young subjects, older subjects (≥55 years) had significantly lower bone strength as measured by CSI, and their BMI was significantly positively associated with bone density. In younger people (<55 years), BMI was not associated with bone strength.
© 2019 Ali et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; QUS; bone; obesity; stiffness index

Year:  2019        PMID: 32099376      PMCID: PMC6997196          DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S230730

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc        ISSN: 1178-2390


  32 in total

1.  Obesity is not protective against fracture in postmenopausal women: GLOW.

Authors:  Juliet E Compston; Nelson B Watts; Roland Chapurlat; Cyrus Cooper; Steven Boonen; Susan Greenspan; Johannes Pfeilschifter; Stuart Silverman; Adolfo Díez-Pérez; Robert Lindsay; Kenneth G Saag; J Coen Netelenbos; Stephen Gehlbach; Frederick H Hooven; Julie Flahive; Jonathan D Adachi; Maurizio Rossini; Andrea Z Lacroix; Christian Roux; Philip N Sambrook; Ethel S Siris
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.965

2.  Regional fat, weight and osteoporosis in elderly women in Egypt.

Authors:  M F Abd-Al-Atty
Journal:  East Mediterr Health J       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.628

3.  Fat mass is not beneficial to bone in adolescents and young adults.

Authors:  Agnieszka Janicka; Tishya A L Wren; Monique M Sanchez; Frederick Dorey; Paul S Kim; Steven D Mittelman; Vicente Gilsanz
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2006-10-17       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  The epidemiology of quantitative ultrasound: a review of the relationships with bone mass, osteoporosis and fracture risk.

Authors:  E W Gregg; A M Kriska; L M Salamone; M M Roberts; S J Anderson; R E Ferrell; L H Kuller; J A Cauley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: a review.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C M Boivin; C M Langton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Evaluation of bone mineral density by quantitative ultrasound of bone in 16,862 subjects during routine health examination.

Authors:  J D Lin; J F Chen; H Y Chang; C Ho
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Association between body mass index and osteoporosis in women from northwestern Rio Grande do Sul.

Authors:  Letícia Mazocco; Patrícia Chagas
Journal:  Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed       Date:  2016-11-09

8.  Bone material properties and mineral matrix contributions to fracture risk or age in women and men.

Authors:  D B Burr
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.041

9.  Assessing bone status beyond BMD: evaluation of bone geometry and porosity by quantitative ultrasound of human finger phalanges.

Authors:  Satoru Sakata; Reinhard Barkmann; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Martin Heller; Claus-Christian Glüer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-01-27       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  Age-related decline in bone mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound in a population-based sample of both sexes: identification of useful ultrasound thresholds for osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  Sigridur L Gudmundsdottir; Olafur S Indridason; Leifur Franzson; Gunnar Sigurdsson
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.963

View more
  3 in total

1.  Replacing sedentary time for physical activity on bone density in patients with chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Masaki Yoshioka; Keisei Kosaki; Masahiro Matsui; Ai Shibata; Koichiro Oka; Makoto Kuro-O; Chie Saito; Kunihiro Yamagata; Seiji Maeda
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 2.626

2.  Endurance running prevents the age-related decline of calcaneal bone stiffness.

Authors:  Diana Ruiz-Vicente; Teresa García-Pastor; Beatriz Lara; Juan José Salinero; Francisco Areces; César Gallo-Salazar; Javier Abián-Vicén; Fernando Jiménez; Juan Del Coso
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.617

3.  Calcaneal Ultrasound and Its Relation to Dietary and Lifestyle Factors, Anthropometry, and Vitamin D Deficiency in Young Medical Students.

Authors:  Lena Jafri; Hafsa Majid; Sibtain Ahmed; Ghazala Naureen; Aysha Habib Khan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.555

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.