Literature DB >> 32097165

The Incidence of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome as Assessed in an International Randomized Controlled Trial (MRC/NIHR ROLARR).

William S Bolton1, Stephen J Chapman1, Neil Corrigan2, Julie Croft2, Fiona Collinson2, Julia M Brown2, David G Jayne1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of LARS in patients undergoing elective anterior resection within the MRC/NIHR ROLARR trial and to explore perioperative variables that might be associated with major LARS. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Sphincter-preserving rectal cancer surgery is frequently accompanied by defaecatory dysfunction known as Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This is distressing for patients and is an unmet clinical challenge.
METHODS: An international, retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing anterior resection within the ROLARR trial was undertaken. Trial participants with restoration of gastrointestinal continuity and free from disease recurrence completed the validated LARS questionnaire between August 2015 and April 2017. The primary outcome was the incidence of LARS and secondary outcome was severity (minor versus major).
RESULTS: LARS questionnaires were received from 132/155 (85%) eligible patients. The median time from surgery to LARS assessment was 1065 days (range 174-1655 d). The incidence of LARS was 82.6% (n = 109/132), which was minor in 26/132 (19.7%) and major in 83/132 (62.9%). The most common symptoms were incontinence to flatus (n = 86/132; 65.2%) and defaecatory clustering (88/132; 66.7%). In a multivariate model, predictors of major LARS were: 1 cm decrease in tumor height above the anal verge (OR = 1.290, 95% CI: 1.101,1.511); and an ASA grade greater than 1 (OR = 2.920, 95% CI: 1.239, 6.883). Treatment allocation (laparoscopic vs robotic) did not predict major LARS.
CONCLUSIONS: LARS is a common after rectal cancer surgery and patients should be appropriately counselled preoperatively, particularly before surgery for low tumors or in comorbid populations.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 32097165     DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  5 in total

Review 1.  Faecal incontinence in adults.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Charles H Knowles; Isabelle Mack; Allison Malcolm; Nicholas Oblizajek; Satish Rao; S Mark Scott; Andrea Shin; Paul Enck
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 65.038

2.  The evaluation of postoperative bowel dysfunction in Japanese patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Yuki Kiyozumi; Toshiya Nagasaki; Shimpei Matsui; Toshiki Mukai; Yukiharu Hiyoshi; Tomohiro Yamaguchi; Takashi Akiyoshi; Yosuke Fukunaga
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2022-10-05       Impact factor: 2.540

3.  The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive (Laparoscopic and Robotic) Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Authors:  Marco E Allaix; Fabrizio Rebecchi; Alessandro Fichera
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Robotic surgery contributes to the preservation of bowel and urinary function after total mesorectal excision: comparisons with transanal and conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Takuya Miura; Yoshiyuki Sakamoto; Hajime Morohashi; Akiko Suto; Shunsuke Kubota; Aika Ichisawa; Daisuke Kuwata; Takahiro Yamada; Hiroaki Tamba; Shuntaro Matsumoto; Kenichi Hakamada
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2022-04-21       Impact factor: 2.030

5.  Risk factors for Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Antonella Nicotera; Ezio Falletto; Alberto Arezzo; Massimiliano Mistrangelo; Roberto Passera; Mario Morino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 3.453

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.