Literature DB >> 32648183

The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive (Laparoscopic and Robotic) Colorectal Cancer Surgery.

Marco E Allaix1, Fabrizio Rebecchi1, Alessandro Fichera2.   

Abstract

Current high-quality evidence supports the routine use of the laparoscopic approach for patients with colon cancer. Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with earlier resumption of gastrointestinal function and shorter hospital stay, with no increased morbidity or mortality. Pathology and long-term oncologic outcomes are similar to those achieved with open surgery. The absolute benefits of laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer are still under evaluation. While its safety in terms of early postoperative clinical outcomes has been confirmed, two recent randomized controlled trial (RCTs) have questioned its routine use even in expert hands, since its non-inferiority has not been demonstrated when compared with the gold standard of open surgery. Furthermore, the impact of robotic technology is still unclear, since the only RCT available so far failed to demonstrate any benefits compared with standard laparoscopic rectal resection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32648183     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08833-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  25 in total

1.  A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  H Jaap Bonjer; Charlotte L Deijen; Gabor A Abis; Miguel A Cuesta; Martijn H G M van der Pas; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Antonio M Lacy; Willem A Bemelman; John Andersson; Eva Angenete; Jacob Rosenberg; Alois Fuerst; Eva Haglind
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial.

Authors:  Mark Buunen; Ruben Veldkamp; Wim C J Hop; Esther Kuhry; Johannes Jeekel; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio Lacy; Hendrik J Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-12-13       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Long-term outcomes of the australasian randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the Australasian Laparoscopic Colon Cancer Study trial.

Authors:  Philip F Bagshaw; Randall A Allardyce; Christopher M Frampton; Francis A Frizelle; Peter J Hewett; Paul J McMurrick; Nicholas A Rieger; J Shona Smith; Michael J Solomon; Andrew R L Stevenson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  J Lujan; G Valero; Q Hernandez; A Sanchez; M D Frutos; P Parrilla
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 6.939

5.  Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer (COLOR II): short-term outcomes of a randomised, phase 3 trial.

Authors:  Martijn Hgm van der Pas; Eva Haglind; Miguel A Cuesta; Alois Fürst; Antonio M Lacy; Wim Cj Hop; Hendrik Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial.

Authors:  Peter J Hewett; Randall A Allardyce; Philip F Bagshaw; Christopher M Frampton; Francis A Frizelle; Nicholas A Rieger; J Shona Smith; Michael J Solomon; Jacqueline H Stephens; Andrew R L Stevenson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Laparoscopic-assisted versus open abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized trial.

Authors:  Simon S M Ng; Ka Lau Leung; Janet F Y Lee; Raymond Y C Yiu; Jimmy C M Li; Anthony Y B Teoh; Wing Wa Leung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Patient-reported genitourinary dysfunction after laparoscopic and open rectal cancer surgery in a randomized trial (COLOR II).

Authors:  J Andersson; G Abis; M Gellerstedt; E Angenete; U Angerås; M A Cuesta; P Jess; J Rosenberg; H J Bonjer; E Haglind
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Ten-year outcomes of a randomised trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colon cancer.

Authors:  Charlotte L Deijen; Jeanine E Vasmel; Elly S M de Lange-de Klerk; Miguel A Cuesta; Peter-Paul L O Coene; Johan F Lange; W J H Jeroen Meijerink; Jack J Jakimowicz; Johannes Jeekel; Geert Kazemier; Ignace M C Janssen; Lars Påhlman; Eva Haglind; H Jaap Bonjer
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  B L Green; H C Marshall; F Collinson; P Quirke; P Guillou; D G Jayne; J M Brown
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Robot-assisted liver resection: the real benefit so far.

Authors:  Reed I Ayabe; Ahad Azimuddin; Hop S Tran Cao
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-30       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Inequalities in access to minimally invasive general surgery: a comprehensive nationwide analysis across 20 years.

Authors:  Marcel André Schneider; Daniel Gero; Matteo Müller; Karoline Horisberger; Andreas Rickenbacher; Matthias Turina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic left colectomy for radical treatment of colon cancer: a retrospective analysis in a consecutive series of 211 patients.

Authors:  Zhixiang Huang; Taiyuan Li; Genghua Zhang; Zhen Zhou; Haoran Shi; Cheng Tang; Lingling Yang; Xiong Lei
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.253

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.