INTRODUCTION: Older age is a melanoma risk factor. Elderly individuals are likelier to have immunosenescence, which could help melanoma cells escape immune surveillance. Hence, it is believed that elderly people cannot mount a potent immune response to checkpoint inhibitors to eliminate melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To investigate age-related differences in the time to progression, overall survival, and immunotherapy-related adverse events among patients with metastatic melanoma who received checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients at our institution between January 2012 and December 2016 with stage IV melanoma who received at least 1 dose of ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or combined ipilimumab and nivolumab. Demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics were obtained. Immune-related response criteria were used to define responses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were younger than age 65 years and 31 were age 65 years or older. Time to progression was comparable between the age groups (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-1.70, p = 0.46). Overall survival was not significantly different after immunotherapy between groups (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval = 0.31-1.82, p = 0.491). Overall, immunotherapy-related adverse events were comparable between groups, with 62% in younger patients (18/29) and 45% in older patients (14/31 p = 0.19). Of 60 patients, 30 responded to immunotherapy. Nonresponders were more likely than responders to have BRAF-mutated melanomas (16 [53.3%] vs 8 [27.6%]; p = 0.04) and less likely to have immunotherapy-related adverse events (12 [40%] vs 20 [66.7%]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Aging does not seem to affect response to checkpoint inhibitors. Elderly patients with metastatic melanoma should be treated similarly to younger patients.
INTRODUCTION: Older age is a melanoma risk factor. Elderly individuals are likelier to have immunosenescence, which could help melanoma cells escape immune surveillance. Hence, it is believed that elderly people cannot mount a potent immune response to checkpoint inhibitors to eliminate melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To investigate age-related differences in the time to progression, overall survival, and immunotherapy-related adverse events among patients with metastatic melanoma who received checkpoint inhibitors. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients at our institution between January 2012 and December 2016 with stage IV melanoma who received at least 1 dose of ipilimumab, pembrolizumab, nivolumab, or combined ipilimumab and nivolumab. Demographic, pathologic, and clinical characteristics were obtained. Immune-related response criteria were used to define responses. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were younger than age 65 years and 31 were age 65 years or older. Time to progression was comparable between the age groups (hazard ratio = 0.79, 95% confidence interval = 0.37-1.70, p = 0.46). Overall survival was not significantly different after immunotherapy between groups (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% confidence interval = 0.31-1.82, p = 0.491). Overall, immunotherapy-related adverse events were comparable between groups, with 62% in younger patients (18/29) and 45% in older patients (14/31 p = 0.19). Of 60 patients, 30 responded to immunotherapy. Nonresponders were more likely than responders to have BRAF-mutated melanomas (16 [53.3%] vs 8 [27.6%]; p = 0.04) and less likely to have immunotherapy-related adverse events (12 [40%] vs 20 [66.7%]; p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Aging does not seem to affect response to checkpoint inhibitors. Elderly patients with metastatic melanoma should be treated similarly to younger patients.
Authors: James Larkin; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Jean Jacques Grob; C Lance Cowey; Christopher D Lao; Dirk Schadendorf; Reinhard Dummer; Michael Smylie; Piotr Rutkowski; Pier F Ferrucci; Andrew Hill; John Wagstaff; Matteo S Carlino; John B Haanen; Michele Maio; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Grant A McArthur; Paolo A Ascierto; Georgina V Long; Margaret K Callahan; Michael A Postow; Kenneth Grossmann; Mario Sznol; Brigitte Dreno; Lars Bastholt; Arvin Yang; Linda M Rollin; Christine Horak; F Stephen Hodi; Jedd D Wolchok Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-05-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: F Aya; A Fernandez-Martinez; L Gaba; I Victoria; M Tosca; E Pineda; P Gascon; A Prat; A Arance Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-05-04 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: Betsy A Kohler; Recinda L Sherman; Nadia Howlader; Ahmedin Jemal; A Blythe Ryerson; Kevin A Henry; Francis P Boscoe; Kathleen A Cronin; Andrew Lake; Anne-Michelle Noone; S Jane Henley; Christie R Eheman; Robert N Anderson; Lynne Penberthy Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-03-30 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Sarah A Weiss; Joseph Han; Farbod Darvishian; Jeremy Tchack; Sung Won Han; Karolina Malecek; Michelle Krogsgaard; Iman Osman; Judy Zhong Journal: J Transl Med Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 5.531
Authors: Vanna Chiarion Sileni; Jacopo Pigozzo; Paolo Antonio Ascierto; Antonio Maria Grimaldi; Michele Maio; Lorenza Di Guardo; Paolo Marchetti; Francesco de Rosa; Carmen Nuzzo; Alessandro Testori; Emilia Cocorocchio; Maria Grazia Bernengo; Michele Guida; Riccardo Marconcini; Barbara Merelli; Giorgio Parmiani; Gaetana Rinaldi; Massimo Aglietta; Marco Grosso; Paola Queirolo Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2014-04-04
Authors: Massimo Ralli; Andrea Botticelli; Irene Claudia Visconti; Diletta Angeletti; Marco Fiore; Paolo Marchetti; Alessandro Lambiase; Marco de Vincentiis; Antonio Greco Journal: J Immunol Res Date: 2020-06-28 Impact factor: 4.818
Authors: Mohammed Safi; Mahmoud Al-Azab; Chenxing Jin; Dario Trapani; Salem Baldi; Salah Adlat; Aman Wang; Bashir Ahmad; Hamza Al-Madani; Xiu Shan; Jiwei Liu Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-11-16 Impact factor: 7.561