Anna N Rahman1,2, Matthew Bressette2, Susan Enguidanos2. 1. 1 Gerontology Research Consultant, Los Angeles, California. 2. 2 Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California , Los Angeles, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) form allows seriously ill individuals to express their preferences for end-of-life treatments. Despite increased POLST use, little is known about the quality of completed forms. OBJECTIVE: We examined the quality of POLST forms prepared for nursing home residents, including whether they had required signatures and clinically consistent care preferences. DESIGN: We conducted a chart review of POLST forms for a sample of nursing home residents in California. SETTING/SAMPLE: We completed POLST audits for 938 residents in 13 nursing homes in Los Angeles. MEASURES: We recorded whether POLST forms were signed by both the patient (or proxy) and the physician, and whether the patient's treatment choices regarding resuscitation and medical intervention were consistent, as required by the California form. RESULTS: Overall, 69.6% of audited POLST forms had at least one indicator of poor quality. Most lacked a required signature (15.8% lacked a physician signature and 17.4% lacked a patient/proxy signature) and 5.6% had conflicting treatment preferences. CONCLUSION: We found 30.4% of POLST forms for nursing home residents were not complete or documented clinically contradictory treatment preferences. Improvement in the quality of POLST forms is needed.
BACKGROUND: The physician orders for life-sustaining treatment (POLST) form allows seriously ill individuals to express their preferences for end-of-life treatments. Despite increased POLST use, little is known about the quality of completed forms. OBJECTIVE: We examined the quality of POLST forms prepared for nursing home residents, including whether they had required signatures and clinically consistent care preferences. DESIGN: We conducted a chart review of POLST forms for a sample of nursing home residents in California. SETTING/SAMPLE: We completed POLST audits for 938 residents in 13 nursing homes in Los Angeles. MEASURES: We recorded whether POLST forms were signed by both the patient (or proxy) and the physician, and whether the patient's treatment choices regarding resuscitation and medical intervention were consistent, as required by the California form. RESULTS: Overall, 69.6% of audited POLST forms had at least one indicator of poor quality. Most lacked a required signature (15.8% lacked a physician signature and 17.4% lacked a patient/proxy signature) and 5.6% had conflicting treatment preferences. CONCLUSION: We found 30.4% of POLST forms for nursing home residents were not complete or documented clinically contradictory treatment preferences. Improvement in the quality of POLST forms is needed.
Entities:
Keywords:
advance directives; end-of-life care; nursing homes
Authors: Susan E Hickman; Christine A Nelson; Nancy A Perrin; Alvin H Moss; Bernard J Hammes; Susan W Tolle Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Lee A Jennings; David Zingmond; Rachel Louie; Chi-Hong Tseng; Judy Thomas; Kate O'Malley; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-17 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Neil S Wenger; Judy Citko; Kate O'Malley; Allison Diamant; Karl Lorenz; Victor Gonzalez; Derjung M Tarn Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-08-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cari Levy; Mary Ersek; Winifred Scott; Joan G Carpenter; Jennifer Kononowech; Ciaran Phibbs; Jill Lowry; Jennifer Cohen; Marybeth Foglia Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: David S Zingmond; David Powell; Lee A Jennings; Jose J Escarce; Li-Jung Liang; Punam Parikh; Neil S Wenger Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2021-12-20 Impact factor: 7.538
Authors: Lee A Jennings; Neil S Wenger; Li-Jung Liang; Punam Parikh; David Powell; Jose J Escarce; David Zingmond Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2022-03-11 Impact factor: 7.538