Literature DB >> 32095754

Tablet-Based Application for Objective Measurement of Motor Fluctuations in Parkinson Disease.

Benjamin D Wissel1, Georgia Mitsi2, Alok K Dwivedi3, Spyridon Papapetropoulos4, Sydney Larkin1, José Ricardo López Castellanos1, Emily Shanks1, Andrew P Duker1, Federico Rodriguez-Porcel1, Jennifer E Vaughan1, Lilia Lovera1, Ioannis Tsoulos5, Athanassios Stavrakoudis6, Alberto J Espay1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The motor subscale of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS-III) has limited applicability for the assessment of motor fluctuations in the home setting.
METHODS: To assess whether a self-administered, tablet-based application can reliably quantify differences in motor performance using two-target finger tapping and forearm pronation-supination tasks in the ON (maximal dopaminergic medication efficacy) and OFF (reemergence of parkinsonian deficits) medication states, we recruited 11 Parkinson disease (PD) patients (age, 60.6 ± 9.0 years; disease duration, 12.8 ± 4.1 years) and 11 healthy age-matched controls (age, 62.5 ± 10.5 years). The total number of taps, tap interval, tap duration, and tap accuracy were algorithmically calculated by the application, using the more affected side in patients and the dominant hand in healthy controls.
RESULTS: Compared to the OFF state, PD patients showed a higher number of taps (84.2 ± 20.3 vs. 54.9 ± 26.9 taps; p = 0.0036) and a shorter tap interval (375.3 ± 97.2 vs. 708.2 ± 412.8 ms; p = 0.0146) but poorer tap accuracy (2,008.4 ± 995.7 vs. 1,111.8 ± 901.3 pixels; p = 0.0055) for the two-target task in the ON state, unaffected by the magnitude of coexistent dyskinesia. Overall, test-retest reliability was high (r >0.75) and the discriminatory ability between OFF and ON states was good (0.60 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.82). The correlations between tapping data and MDS-UPDRS-III scores were only moderate (-0.55 to 0.55).
CONCLUSIONS: A self-administered, tablet-based application can reliably distinguish between OFF and ON states in fluctuating PD patients and may be sensitive to additional motor phenomena, such as accuracy, not captured by the MDS-UPDRS-III.
Copyright © 2018 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  App-based digital biomarkers; Motor symptoms; Objective monitoring of motor symptoms; Parkinson disease-related motor symptoms

Year:  2018        PMID: 32095754      PMCID: PMC7015371          DOI: 10.1159/000485468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digit Biomark        ISSN: 2504-110X


  27 in total

1.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Joanne M Garrett
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Reproducibility of a triaxial seismic accelerometer (DynaPort).

Authors:  Vincent T Van Hees; Sander M Slootmaker; Gert De Groot; Willem Van Mechelen; Rob C Van Lummel
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Dopamine overdose hypothesis: evidence and clinical implications.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Daniel Schonfeld; Youngbin Kwak; Nicolaas I Bohnen; Rachael Seidler
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 4.  A clinical view on the development of technology-based tools in managing Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Walter Maetzler; Jochen Klucken; Malcolm Horne
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 10.338

5.  Paradoxical effect of dopamine medication on cognition in Parkinson's disease: relationship to side of motor onset.

Authors:  Brenda Hanna-Pladdy; Rajesh Pahwa; Kelly E Lyons
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.892

6.  The modified bradykinesia rating scale for Parkinson's disease: reliability and comparison with kinematic measures.

Authors:  Dustin A Heldman; Joseph P Giuffrida; Robert Chen; Megan Payne; Filomena Mazzella; Andrew P Duker; Alok Sahay; Sang Jin Kim; Fredy J Revilla; Alberto J Espay
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 10.338

7.  Expanded and independent validation of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS).

Authors:  Pablo Martinez-Martin; Carmen Rodriguez-Blazquez; Mario Alvarez-Sanchez; Tomoko Arakaki; Alberto Bergareche-Yarza; Anabel Chade; Nelida Garretto; Oscar Gershanik; Monica M Kurtis; Juan Carlos Martinez-Castrillo; Amelia Mendoza-Rodriguez; Henry P Moore; Mayela Rodriguez-Violante; Carlos Singer; Barbara C Tilley; Jing Huang; Glenn T Stebbins; Christopher G Goetz
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-08-05       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Biometric Digital Health Technology for Measuring Motor Function in Parkinson's Disease: Results from a Feasibility and Patient Satisfaction Study.

Authors:  Georgia Mitsi; Enrique Urrea Mendoza; Benjamin D Wissel; Elena Barbopoulou; Alok K Dwivedi; Ioannis Tsoulos; Athanassios Stavrakoudis; Alberto J Espay; Spyros Papapetropoulos
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Technology in Parkinson's disease: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Alberto J Espay; Paolo Bonato; Fatta B Nahab; Walter Maetzler; John M Dean; Jochen Klucken; Bjoern M Eskofier; Aristide Merola; Fay Horak; Anthony E Lang; Ralf Reilmann; Joe Giuffrida; Alice Nieuwboer; Malcolm Horne; Max A Little; Irene Litvan; Tanya Simuni; E Ray Dorsey; Michelle A Burack; Ken Kubota; Anita Kamondi; Catarina Godinho; Jean-Francois Daneault; Georgia Mitsi; Lothar Krinke; Jeffery M Hausdorff; Bastiaan R Bloem; Spyros Papapetropoulos
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 10.338

Review 10.  Technologies Assessing Limb Bradykinesia in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Hasan Hasan; Dilan S Athauda; Thomas Foltynie; Alastair J Noyce
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 5.568

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The Digital Neurologic Examination.

Authors:  Adam B Cohen; Brain V Nahed
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-26

2.  Reply to: Touchscreen Smartphone Interaction in Parkinson's Disease and Healthy Subjects on Out-Patient Clinics.

Authors:  Joni De Vleeschhauwer; Alice Nieuwboer; Evelien Nackaerts
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-10-07

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of keystroke dynamics as digital biomarkers for fine motor decline in neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hessa Alfalahi; Ahsan H Khandoker; Nayeefa Chowdhury; Dimitrios Iakovakis; Sofia B Dias; K Ray Chaudhuri; Leontios J Hadjileontiadis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Impaired Touchscreen Skills in Parkinson's Disease and Effects of Medication.

Authors:  Joni De Vleeschhauwer; Sanne Broeder; Luc Janssens; Elke Heremans; Alice Nieuwboer; Evelien Nackaerts
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-03-12

5.  Developing and assessing a new web-based tapping test for measuring distal movement in Parkinson's disease: a Distal Finger Tapping test.

Authors:  Noreen Akram; Haoxuan Li; Aaron Ben-Joseph; Caroline Budu; David A Gallagher; Jonathan P Bestwick; Anette Schrag; Alastair J Noyce; Cristina Simonet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Remote Assessments of Hand Function in Neurological Disorders: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Arpita Gopal; Wan-Yu Hsu; Diane D Allen; Riley Bove
Journal:  JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol       Date:  2022-03-09

Review 7.  Measurement of upper limb function in ALS: a structured review of current methods and future directions.

Authors:  C D Hayden; B P Murphy; O Hardiman; D Murray
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.682

8.  Touchscreen-based finger tapping: Repeatability and configuration effects on tapping performance.

Authors:  Soma Makai-Bölöni; Eva Thijssen; Emilie M J van Brummelen; Geert J Groeneveld; Robert J Doll
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.