| Literature DB >> 32095085 |
Vivian Soetikno1, Andriyani Murwantara2, Prisma Andini2, Fabrian Charlie2, Gilbert Lazarus3, Melva Louisa1, Wawaimuli Arozal1.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of present study was to analyze the effect of alpha-mangostin on cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis and biochemical parameters in high-fat/high-glucose diet and low-dose streptozotocin injection (HF/HG/STZ)-induced type 2 diabetic rats.Entities:
Keywords: cardiomyopathy; diabetes mellitus; dietary fats; hyperglycemia; hyperinsulinemia; insulin resistance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32095085 PMCID: PMC6995289 DOI: 10.2147/JEP.S233111
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Pharmacol ISSN: 1179-1454
Body Weight, Left Ventricle Weight, LVW/BW Ratio, and Insulin Sensitivity Index of Rats at the End of Experiment
| Variable | Control (n=6) | Control + AM200 (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + Metformin (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + AM100 (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + AM200 (n=6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 280 ± 49.9 | 273 ± 45.09 | 249.7 ± 34.81 | 284 ± 42.17 | 276.7 ± 49.7 | 255 ± 22.46 |
| LV weight (g) | 0.70 ± 0.04 | 0.70 ± 0.09 | 0.72 ± 0.16 | 0.60 ± 0.11 | 0.62 ± 0.08 | 0.69 ± 0.07 |
| LVW/BW (g/kg) | 2.63 ± 0.47 | 2.75 ± 0.78 | 2.97 ± 0.81* | 2.18 ± 0.52** | 2.32 ± 0.37# | 2.67 ± 0.29## |
| Blood Pressure (mmHg) | 115 ± 12/89 ± 12 | 102 ± 31/81 ± 30 | 144 ± 7/107 ± 5* | 122 ± 7/97 ± 7** | 113 ± 12/85 ± 11# | 131 ± 8/101 ± 8## |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) | 105.6 ± 7.5 | 105.2 ± 7.9 | 277.4 ± 35* | 133.6 ± 27** | 147.8 ± 39# | 124.8 ± 49## |
| Food intake (g/day) | 25 ± 1.04 | 24.5 ± 1.1 | 29 ± 2.2 | 27 ± 2.1 | 26 ± 0.3 | 25 ± 1.2 |
| Insulin (μU/mL) | 4.59 ± 0.2 | 4.53 ± 0.3 | 5.78 ± 0.9* | 4.58 ± 0.5** | 4.46 ± 0.2# | 4.59 ± 0.2## |
| HOMA-IR | 1.20 ± 0.11 | 1.08 ± 0.11 | 2.21 ± 0.67* | 1.04 ± 0.45** | 1.04 ± 0.45# | 1.15 ± 0.47## |
| CK-MB (U/L) | 63.9 ± 14 | 46.4 ± 9 | 116.1 ± 32* | 72.7 ± 9.3** | 31.9 ± 17.5# | 34.6 ± 10## |
| LDH (U/L) | 237.6 ± 38 | 248.8 ± 25 | 300.8 ± 32* | 267.3 ± 52 | 240.6 ± 59 | 230.2 ± 32 |
Notes: *p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs control and control-treated with alpha-mangostin. **p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + Metformin. #p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 100. ##p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 200. Results are represented as mean ± SD and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Values are considered significantly different at p < 0.05.
Effect of Alpha-Mangostin on Liver Function Test and Renal Function Test of Rats at the End of 11 Weeks
| Variable | Control (n=6) | Control + AM200 (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + Metformin (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + AM100 (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + AM200 (n=6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ALT (mg/dL) | 15.17 ± 1.52 | 25.79 ± 6.30 | 75.17 ± 8.36* | 36.29 ± 7.20** | 49.58 ± 9.26# | 37.27 ± 5.27## |
| AST (mg/dL) | 32.55 ± 4.21 | 40.02 ± 2.4 | 74.56 ± 6.75* | 55.16 ± 8.23** | 54.06 ± 3.92# | 53.70 ± 5.54## |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 22.63 ± 2.89 | 25.91 ± 4.61 | 37.28 ± 13.48* | 17.01 ± 1.69** | 16.65 ± 6.14# | 22.07 ± 5.31## |
| Uric acid (mg/dL) | 1.7 ± 0.13 | 1.51 ± 0.28 | 6.59 ± 0.09* | 2.32 ± 1.9 | 4.43 ± 1.8 | 3.41 ± 2.13 |
Notes: *p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs control and control-treated with alpha-mangostin. **p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + Metformin. #p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 100. ##p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 200. Results are represented as mean ± SD and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Values are considered significantly different at p < 0.05.
Effect of Alpha-Mangostin on Lipid Plasma of Rats at the End of 11 Weeks
| Variable | Control (n=6) | Control + AM200 (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + Metformin (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + AM100 (n=6) | HF/HG/STZ + AM200 (n=6) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 44.14 ± 9.15 | 46.01 ± 9.13 | 65.02 ± 1.24* | 56.75 ± 7.52 | 45.49 ± 6.34# | 45.96 ± 6.74## |
| Trigyceride (mg/dL) | 61.23 ± 3.07 | 70.48 ± 5.7 | 86.33 ± 12.2* | 64.37 ± 7.13 | 47.14 ± 8.22# | 71.05 ± 4.49## |
Notes: *p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs control and control-treated with alpha-mangostin. #p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 100. ##p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 200. Results are represented as mean ± SD and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Values are considered significantly different at p < 0.05.
Figure 1Effects of alpha-mangostin on gene and protein expression of TNF-α. (A) Real-time PCR analysis shows that HF/HG/STZ-induced T2DM up-regulated the TNF-α mRNA, which was downregulated by the administration of alpha-mangostin in both doses and metformin. (B) ELISA analysis shows that HF/HG/STZ-induced T2DM upregulated the TNF-α protein expression, which was downregulated by the administration of alpha-mangostin in both doses and metformin. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n=6), and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Values are considered significantly different at p < 0.05. *p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs control and control-treated with alpha-mangostin. **p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + Metformin. #p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 100. ##p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 200.
Figure 2Effects of alpha-mangostin on protein expression of MCP-1, IL-1β, and IL-6. ELISA analysis shows that HF/HG/STZ-induced T2DM upregulated the (A) MCP-1, (B) IL-1β, and (C) IL-6 protein expression, which were downregulated by the administration of alpha-mangostin in both doses and metformin. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n=6), and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Values are considered significantly different at p < 0.05. *p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs control and control-treated with alpha-mangostin. **p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + Metformin. #p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 100. ##p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 200.
Figure 3Effects of alpha-mangostin on histopathological changes. (A–F) Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the cross-sectional tissue slices of left ventricular depicting cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (×200). (A) control; (B) control-treated with AM 200; (C) HF/HG/STZ; (D) HF/HG/STZ + Metformin; (E) HF/HG/STZ + AM 100; (F) HF/HG/STZ + AM 200. Arrows in (C) indicate cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. (G) Bar graph shows quantitative analysis of cross-sectional area. Results are represented as mean ± SD and were analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post-hoc analysis. Values are considered significantly different at p < 0.05. *p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs control and control-treated with alpha-mangostin. #p < 0.05 HF/HG/STZ vs HF/HG/STZ + AM 100.
Figure 4Effects of alpha-mangostin on cardiac fibrosis. (A–F) Masson’s trichrome staining for fibrosis of the cross-sectional tissue slices of left ventricular. Fibrosis is indicated by blue area as opposed to the red myocardium (×200). HF/HG/STZ administration for 11 weeks markedly enhanced fibrotic tissue in myocardium [C]. Treatment with metformin and alpha mangostin [D-F] reduced the fibrotic tissue in myocardium similar to that in control rats [A and B].