Literature DB >> 32094271

The authors respond to "Routine use of episiotomy with forceps should not be encouraged".

Giulia M Muraca1, K S Joseph2.   

Abstract

Year:  2020        PMID： 32094271      PMCID： PMC7043826          DOI： 10.1503/cmaj.74565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN： 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Is there a benefit to episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery? Observations over ten years in a stable population.

Authors:  J L Ecker; W M Tan; R K Bansal; J T Bishop; S J Kilpatrick
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Ecological association between operative vaginal delivery and obstetric and birth trauma.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Yasser Sabr; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Episiotomy use among vaginal deliveries and the association with anal sphincter injury: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Giulia M Muraca; Shiliang Liu; Yasser Sabr; Sarka Lisonkova; Amanda Skoll; Rollin Brant; Geoffrey W Cundiff; Olof Stephansson; Neda Razaz; K S Joseph
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Xu Qian; Guillermo Carroli; Paul Garner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-08

5.  Management of Spontaneous Labour at Term in Healthy Women.

Authors:  Lily Lee; Jessica Dy; Hussam Azzam
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2016-06-25

6.  Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician.

Authors:  Patricia A Janssen; Lee Saxell; Lesley A Page; Michael C Klein; Robert M Liston; Shoo K Lee
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.