| Literature DB >> 32093693 |
Jian-Ting Wu1, Shou-Sheng Liu2,3, Xiang-Jun Xie1, Qun Liu1, Yong-Ning Xin4,5, Shi-Ying Xuan6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: CHD is reported to be the primary cause of death in patients with NAFLD. Genetic susceptibility genes contribute to the developmental risk of NAFLD or CHD. Whether the genetic factors could affect the risk of CHD in NAFLD patients is not clear. The aim of this study was to investigate the association of PNPLA3 I148M and TM6SF2 E167K variants with the risk of CHD in NAFLD patients in Chinese Han population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PNPLA3 I148M and TM6SF2 E167K variants were genotyped in a cohort of 189 patients with NAFLD and CHD, as well as 242 patients with NAFLD and 242 healthy controls by gene sequencing. Additionally, serum lipids profiles were determined by standard clinical laboratory methods.Entities:
Keywords: Coronary heart disease; Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; PNPLA3 I148M; TM6SF2 E167K
Year: 2020 PMID: 32093693 PMCID: PMC7041191 DOI: 10.1186/s12944-020-01207-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Clinical and biochemical characteristics of each group a
| Characteristic | NAFLD+CHD | NAFLD | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, y | 58.10 ± 6.95 | 57.7 ± 8.53 | 58.90 ± 5.53 |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 25.69 ± 3.2*@ | 26.76 ± 2.82* | 23.65 ± 3.50 |
| FPG, mmol/L | 5.81 ± 1.81*@ | 5.00 ± 1.35 | 4.85 ± 1.55 |
| ALT, U/L | 30.23 ± 2.80* | 34.56 ± 26.27* | 22.47 ± 21.14 |
| AST, U/L | 45.73 ± 70.71*@ | 28.45 ± 21.49* | 22.52 ± 11.84 |
| TC, mmol/L | 5.22 ± 1.17 | 5.48 ± 0.83* | 5.10 ± 1.17 |
| TG, mmol/L | 2.00 ± 1.07* | 1.92 ± 1.31* | 1.52 ± 1.10 |
| LDL, mmol/L | 3.09 ± 1.06 | 3.26 ± 0.59 | 3.15 ± 0.73 |
| HDL, mmol/L | 1.03 ± 0.28*@ | 1.23 ± 0.21 | 1.29 ± 0.38 |
Abbreviations: NAFLD non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, CHD coronary heart disease, BMI body mass index, FPG fasting plasma glucose, TC total cholesterol, TG triglyceride, LDL low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, AST aspartate aminotransferase, ALT alanine aminotransferase
* Compared with the control group, P < 0.05; @ compared with NAFLD group, P < 0.05
aData are presented as mean ± SD
Minor allele frequency in the present study and other populations
| SNP | Present study | AFR | AMR | EAS | EUR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.39 | 0.12 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 0.23 | |
| 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
Abbreviation: AFR African, AMR American, EAS East Asian, EUR European
Genotype and allele frequency of PNPLA3 I148M in each group
| SNP | NAFLD+CHD | NAFLD | Control | NAFLD+CHD vs NAFLD | NAFLD+CHD vs Control | NAFLD vs Control | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 | χ2 | χ2 | |||||||
| PNPLA3 I148M | |||||||||
| Genotype | 9.30 | 0.01 | 0.21 | 0.90 | 8.36 | 0.02 | |||
| CC | 79 | 73 | 106 | ||||||
| CG | 89 | 121 | 128 | ||||||
| GG | 21 | 48 | 32 | ||||||
| Allele | 9.13 | 0.00 | 0.09 | 0.77 | 4.69 | 0.03 | |||
| C | 247 (65.34) | 267 (55.17) | 340 (63.90) | ||||||
| G | 131 (34.66) | 217 (44.83) | 192 (36.09) | ||||||
Association between PNPLA3 I148M and CHD outcome in NAFLD patients
| NAFLD+CHD vs NAFLD | NAFLD+CHD vs control | NAFLD vs control | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | OR (95%CI) | ||||
| CC | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||
| CG + GG | 0.60 (0.40–0.90) | 0.01 | 0.92 (0.63–1.35) | 0.68 | 1.53 (1.06–2.22) | 0.02 |
Fig. 1Proportion of patients with NAFLD+CHD in each group of subjects that harboring different number of risk alleles
Risk for CHD outcome in NAFLD patients with different number of SNPs
| Number of risk alleles | OR (95%CI) | |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | |
| 1 | 0.632 (0.405–0.987) | 0.04 |
| 2 | 0.418 (0.235–0.743) | < 0.01 |
| 3 | 0.119 (0.014–1.000) | 0.05 |
Fig. 2Differences of serum levels of (a) TC, (b) TG, (c) HDL, and (d) LDL between subjects with PNPLA3 CC genotype and CG + GG genotype. Data are presented as mean values and standard deviations (Mean ± SD)
Fig. 3Differences of serum levels of (a) TC, (b) TG, (c) HDL, and (d) LDL between subjects with different number of risk alleles. Data are presented as mean values and standard deviations (Mean ± SD)