| Literature DB >> 32092925 |
David Ramiro-Cortijo1, Pratibha Singh1, Yan Liu1, Esli Medina-Morales1, William Yakah2, Steven D Freedman1,3, Camilia R Martin2,3.
Abstract
Human breast milk is the optimal source of nutrition for infant growth and development. Breast milk fats and their downstream derivatives of fatty acids and fatty acid-derived terminal mediators not only provide an energy source but also are important regulators of development, immune function, and metabolism. The composition of the lipids and fatty acids determines the nutritional and physicochemical properties of human milk fat. Essential fatty acids, including long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (LCPUFAs) and specialized pro-resolving mediators, are critical for growth, organogenesis, and regulation of inflammation. Combined data including in vitro, in vivo, and human cohort studies support the beneficial effects of human breast milk in intestinal development and in reducing the risk of intestinal injury. Human milk has been shown to reduce the occurrence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), a common gastrointestinal disease in preterm infants. Preterm infants fed human breast milk are less likely to develop NEC compared to preterm infants receiving infant formula. Intestinal development and its physiological functions are highly adaptive to changes in nutritional status influencing the susceptibility towards intestinal injury in response to pathological challenges. In this review, we focus on lipids and fatty acids present in breast milk and their impact on neonatal gut development and the risk of disease.Entities:
Keywords: breast milk; long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids; milk fat globule; necrotizing enterocolitis; premature infants
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32092925 PMCID: PMC7071444 DOI: 10.3390/nu12020534
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Fatty acid profile of breast milk across lactation stages.
| Term Infants | Preterm Infants | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colostrum | Transitional | Mature | Colostrum | Transitional | Mature | |
|
| ||||||
| Caprylic acid (C8:0) | 0.07–0.19 | 0.2–0.31 | 0.2–0.3 | 0.03–0.03 | 0.09–0.11 | 0.16–0.16 |
| Capric acid (C10:0) | 0.5–1.04 | 1.2–1.6 | 1.5–1.8 | 0.09–0.09 | 1.0–1.7 | 1.2–2.1 |
| Lauric acid (C12:0) | 2.8–3.5 | 5.4–6.6 | 5.7–6.5 | 3.2–4.6 | 5.7–7.5 | 5.7–8.1 |
| Myristic acid (C14:0) | 5.4–6.0 | 6.6–7.5 | 6.5–7.1 | 5.8–7.2 | 8.0–9.2 | 7.4–9.0 |
| Palmitic acid (C16:0) | 24.3–25.5 | 21.9–23.3 | 21.7–22.7 | 22.5–24.1 | 21.5–23.5 | 20.9–22.3 |
| Stearic acid (C18:0) | 6.2–6.6 | 6.1–6.7 | 6.3–6.6 | 5.8–6.5 | 6.0–6.9 | 6.2–7.1 |
| Arachidic acid (C20:0) | 0.19–0.25 | 0.20–0.32 | 0.20–0.26 | 0.16–0.18 | 0.15–0.15 | 0.20–0.30 |
|
| ||||||
| Myristoleic acid (C14:1n-5) | 0.13–0.23 | 0.19–0.25 | 0.18–0.22 | 0.11–0.13 | 0.22–0.22 | 0.21–0.21 |
| Palmitoleic acid (C16:1n-7) | 1.9–2.2 | 2.0–2.4 | 2.2–2.4 | 1.7–1.8 | 2.1–2.5 | 2.0–2.5 |
| Oleic acid (C18:1n-9) | 34.7–35.9 | 31.2–33.2 | 32.2–33.6 | 30.6–33.7 | 30.5–34.3 | 31.7–36.7 |
| Vaccenic acid (C18:1n-7) | 2.6–2.8 | 1.9–2.0 | 1.7–2.1 | 2.3–2.4 | 2.5–2.6 | 2.1–2.2 |
| Erucic acid (C22:1n-9) | 0.20–0.24 | 0.14–0.28 | 0.10–0.12 | 0.16–0.16 | 0.10–0.14 | 0.08–0.05 |
| n- | ||||||
| α-Linolenic acid (C18:3n-3) | 0.74–0.90 | 0.84–1.06 | 0.91–1.03 | 0.69–1.09 | 0.70–1.02 | 0.85–1.13 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid (C20:5n-3) | 0.08–0.12 | 0.11–0.17 | 0.08–0.10 | 0.06–0.10 | 0.10–0.16 | 0.08–0.16 |
| Clupanodonic acid (C22:5n-3) | 0.27–0.33 | 0.19–0.25 | 0.14–0.16 | 0.30–0.34 | 0.24–0.36 | 0.16–0.24 |
| Docosahexaenoic acid (C22:6n-3) | 0.47–0.55 | 0.40–0.52 | 0.28–0.34 | 0.43–0.71 | 0.47–0.67 | 0.31–0.49 |
| n- | ||||||
| Linoleic acid (C18:2n-6) | 13.5–15.3 | 13.4–14.8 | 14.3–15.7 | 13.7–16.3 | 11.4–13.6 | 12.3–14.4 |
| γ-Linolenic acid (C18:3n-6) | 0.07–0.11 | 0.10–0.18 | 0.14–0.20 | 0.07–0.07 | 0.09–0.13 | 0.11–0.21 |
| Eicosadienoic acid (C20:2n-6) | 0.82–0.96 | 0.53–0.63 | 0.35–0.41 | 0.89–0.95 | 0.28–0.30 | 0.24–0.24 |
| Dihomo-γ-Linolenic acid (C20:3n-6) | 0.56–0.64 | 0.46–0.52 | 0.39–0.43 | 0.69–0.81 | 0.47–0.55 | 0.40–0.50 |
| Arachidonic acid (C20:4n-6) | 0.73–0.81 | 0.61–0.69 | 0.45–0.51 | 0.68–0.90 | 0.54–0.68 | 0.48–0.58 |
| Docosatetraenoic acid (C22:4n-6) | 0.29–0.39 | 0.19–0.25 | 0.09–0.11 | 0.44–0.49 | 0.22–0.22 | 0.13–0.17 |
| Adrenic acid (C22:5n-6) | 0.13–0.21 | 0.09–0.13 | 0.06–0.10 | 0.15–0.17 | 0.05–0.05 | 0.05–0.09 |
Data shows the relative proportion in total lipids (%) between mothers who had term and preterm infants. Colostrum = 0–5 days of postnatal life (DPL); Transitional = 6–15 DPL; Mature = 16–60 DPL. Data abstracted from [6].
Figure 1Breast milk fat components and relationship with neonatal health-disease balance. Scheme of fat globule illustrating of the core-shell structure.
Human studies of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (LCPUFA) supplementation in preterm infants and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) risk.
| Reference | Study Design | Population | n | Powerful and Prevalence of NEC | Principal Finding in NEC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smithers et al. (2008) [ | Systematic review | <37 GA | 1333 | RR = [0.62–2.04] | No benefit of n-3 LCPUFA supplemented formula |
| Zhang et al. (2014) [ | Systemic review | <32 GA | 900 | RR = [0.23–1.10] | No benfit of n-3 LCPUFA supplementation |
|
| |||||
| Carlson et al. (1998) [ | Formula supplemented with 0.41% ARA + 0.13% DHA | <32 GA | 119 | Control = 17.6% | Significantly decreased |
| Fewtrell et al. (2002) [ | Formula supplemented with 0.31% ARA + 0.17% DHA | <37 GA | 197 | Control = 11% | No significant difference |
| Innis et al. (2002) [ | BM supplemented with DHA | BW between 846–1560 g | 194 | Control = 1.6% | No significant difference |
| Fewtrell et al. (2004) [ | Formula supplemented with 0.31% ARA + 0.17% DHA | <35 GA | 238 | Control = 2% | No significant difference |
| Clandinin et al. (2005) [ | Formula supplemented with DHA + ARA | <35 GA | 361 | Control = 3% | No significant difference |
| Henriksen et al. (2008) [ | BM supplemented with 6.7% ARA + 6.9% DHA | BW <1500 g | 141 | Control = 3% | No significant difference |
| Makrides et al. (2009) [ | High DHA (1%) | <33 GA | 657 | Adj. OR = [0.87–5.22] | No significant difference |
| Collins et al. (2016) [ | Formula supplemented with different doses of DHA | <30 GA | 53 | Control = 9% | No significant difference |
| Collins et al. (2017) [ | BM supplemented with 60 mg/kg/day DHA | <29 WGA | 1273 | Adj. OR = [0.79–1.69] | No significant difference |
In the double-blinded randomized clinical trials, the control group was no supplementation feeding. Breast milk (BM); birth weight (BW); weeks of gestational age (GA); the relative risk (RR) or adjusted odd ratio (OR) shown as 95% confidence interval.