Literature DB >> 32092492

Psychological and neural responses to architectural interiors.

Alexander Coburn1, Oshin Vartanian2, Yoed N Kenett3, Marcos Nadal4, Franziska Hartung5, Gregor Hayn-Leichsenring5, Gorka Navarrete6, José L González-Mora7, Anjan Chatterjee5.   

Abstract

People spend considerable time within built environments. In this study, we tested two hypotheses about the relationship between people and built environments. First, aesthetic responses to architectural interiors reduce to a few key psychological dimensions that are sensitive to design features. Second, these psychological dimensions evoke specific neural signatures. In Experiment 1, participants (n = 798) rated 200 images of architectural interiors on 16 aesthetic response measures. Using Psychometric Network Analysis (PNA) and Principal Components Analysis (PCA), we identified three components that explained 90% of the variance in ratings: coherence (ease with which one organizes and comprehends a scene), fascination (a scene's informational richness and generated interest), and hominess (extent to which a scene reflects a personal space). Whereas coherence and fascination are well-established dimensions in response to natural scenes and visual art, hominess emerged as a new dimension related to architectural interiors. In Experiment 2 (n = 614), the PCA results were replicated in an independent sample, indicating the robustness of these three dimensions. In Experiment 3, we reanalyzed data from an fMRI study in which participants (n = 18) made beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions when viewing the same images. Parametric analyses demonstrated that, regardless of task, the degree of fascination covaried with neural activity in the right lingual gyrus. In contrast, coherence covaried with neural activity in the left inferior occipital gyrus only when participants judged beauty, whereas hominess covaried with neural activity in the left cuneus only when they made approach-avoidance decisions. Importantly, this neural activation did not covary in relation to global image properties including self-similarity and complexity scores. These results suggest that the visual brain harbors sensitivities to psychological dimensions of coherence, fascination, and hominess in the context of architectural interiors. Furthermore, valuation of architectural processing in visual cortices varies by dimension and task.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetics; Architecture; Environmental psychology; Hygge; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32092492     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.01.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  5 in total

1.  The Influence of Viewing Time and Color on Architectural Aesthetic Judgment.

Authors:  Anbang Dai; Junru Wang; Jie Yu; Hiroatsu Fukuda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-01-27

2.  Aesthetic judgment of architecture for Chinese observers.

Authors:  Anbang Dai; Jiajie Zou; Junru Wang; Nai Ding; Hiroatsu Fukuda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Application of Neuroscience Tools in Building Construction - An Interdisciplinary Analysis.

Authors:  Mengmeng Wang; Xiaodan Liu; Yu Lai; Wenna Cao; Zhiyong Wu; Xiaotong Guo
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Measuring arousal and valence generated by the dynamic experience of architectural forms in virtual environments.

Authors:  Paolo Presti; Davide Ruzzon; Pietro Avanzini; Fausto Caruana; Giacomo Rizzolatti; Giovanni Vecchiato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  The Development of a Public Bathroom Perception Scale.

Authors:  Guido Corradi; Eduardo Garcia-Garzon; Juan Ramón Barrada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.390

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.