Literature DB >> 29307672

Long-term humeral complications after Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Francesco Ascione1, Peter Domos2, Vincenzo Guarrella2, Mikaël Chelli3, Pascal Boileau3, Gilles Walch2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent experiences with Grammont reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have revealed some problems related to the biomechanical changes of the shoulder and humeral stem complications. We analyzed humeral complications in a long-term follow-up of a large series of RSAs, searching for correlations between these and the initial etiology, the follow-up duration, and the clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative clinical and radiologic assessments of 1035 RSAs with a minimum 5-year follow-up (implanted in 7 specialized shoulder centers between 1993 and 2010) were retrospectively collected. Postoperative humeral complications, managed conservatively or surgically, were radiographically documented.
RESULTS: Overall, a 3.3% rate of postoperative humeral complications was found in our database. We identified 17 cases (1.6%) with postoperative humeral fractures, 15 cases (1.4%) with aseptic humeral loosening, and 3 cases (0.3%) with humeral stem disassembly. The humeral complications were more frequent in RSAs implanted for tumors, fracture sequelae, and revision for failed arthroplasty. DISCUSSION: Humeral complications after RSA are not rare, increase with longer follow-up, and have a negative impact on functional outcomes. Postoperative humeral fractures are more frequent in elderly patients, operated on through a superior approach, and after cemented stem implantation. In the absence of associated humeral loosening, conservative treatment should be preferred. Proximal humeral bone loss (due to revisions and tumors) is the most significant risk factor for humeral loosening. Implant unscrewing was initially related to a technological problem, which has been solved, and this complication has disappeared.
Copyright © 2017 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; clinical outcomes; complications; disassembly; fracture; humeral stem; loosening; subsidence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29307672     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  14 in total

1.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Specific Design of a Press Fit Humeral Stem Provides low Stress Shielding in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty at minimum 5 Years FU.

Authors:  Geoffroy Nourissat; Simon Corsia; Howard W Harris; Pierre-Alban Bouché
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  Inadvertent, intraoperative, non- to minimally displaced periprosthetic humeral shaft fractures in RTSA do not affect the clinical and radiographic short-term outcome.

Authors:  Anita Hasler; Philipp Kriechling; Caroline Passaplan; Karl Wieser
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 4.  Anatomical and reverse megaprosthesis in proximal humerus reconstructions after oncologic resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michele Fiore; Andrea Sambri; Claudio Giannini; Riccardo Zucchini; Roberto De Cristofaro; Massimiliano De Paolis
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.928

5.  Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review.

Authors:  Su Cheol Kim; Il Su Kim; Min Chang Jang; Jae Chul Yoo
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2021-03-02

Review 6.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

Review 7.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Alexander M Roche; Spencer W Sullivan; Benjamin T Gaal; Stewart Dalton; Arjun Sharma; Joseph J King; Brian M Grawe; Surena Namdari; Macy Lawler; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-10

8.  Humeral-sided Radiographic Changes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler J Brolin; Ryan M Cox; John G Horneff Iii; Surena Namdari; Joseph A Abboud; Kristen Nicholson; Matthew L Ramsey
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-01

9.  Humeral bone resorption after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using uncemented stem.

Authors:  Kazuya Inoue; Naoki Suenaga; Naomi Oizumi; Hiroshi Yamaguchi; Naoki Miyoshi; Noboru Taniguchi; Shuzo Morita; Mitsuru Munemoto; Shimpei Kurata; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-01-14

10.  The Anatomical Variation of the Scapular Spine in A Chinese Population.

Authors:  Yimu Lin; Kaifeng Gan; Lei Zhang; Hongrui Wei; Xin Zhou; Hengshu Chen
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-11-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.