Literature DB >> 3208854

Cerebellar involvement in the coordination control of the oculo-manual tracking system: effects of cerebellar dentate nucleus lesion.

J L Vercher1, G M Gauthier.   

Abstract

When the hand of the observer is used as a visual target, oculomotor performance evaluated in terms of tracking accuracy, delay and maximal ocular velocity is higher than when the subject tracks a visual target presented on a screen. The coordination control exerted by the motor system of the arm on the oculomotor system has two sources: the transfer of kinaesthetic information originating in the arm which increases the mutual coupling between the arm and the eyes and information from the arm movement efferent copy which synchronizes the motor activities of both subsystems (Gauthier et al. 1988; Gauthier and Mussa-Ivaldi 1988). We investigated the involvement of the cerebellum in coordination control during a visuo-oculo-manual tracking task. Experiments were conducted on baboons trained to track visual targets with the eyes and/or the hand. The role of the cerebellum was determined by comparing tracking performance defined in terms of delay, accuracy (position or velocity tracking errors) and maximal velocity, before and after lesioning the cerebellar dentate nucleus. Results showed that in the intact animal, ocular tracking was more saccadic when the monkey followed an external target than when it moved the target with its hand. After lesioning, eye-alone tracking of a visual target as well as eye-and-hand-tracking with the hand contralateral to the lesion was little if at all affected. Conversely, ocular tracking of the hand ipsilateral to the lesion side became more saccadic and the correlation between eye and hand movement decreased considerably while the delay between target and eyes increased. In normal animals, the delay between the eyes and the hand was close to zero, and maximal smooth pursuit velocity was around 100 degrees per second with close to unity gain; in eye-alone tracking the delay and maximal smooth pursuit velocity were 200 ms and 50 deg per second, respectively. After lesioning, delay and maximum velocity were respectively around 210 ms and 40 deg per second, that is close to the values measured in eye-alone tracking. Thus, after dentate lesioning, the oculomotor system was unable to use information from the motor system of the arm to enhance its performance. We conclude that the cerebellum is involved in the "coordination control" between the oculomotor and manual motor systems in visuo-oculo-manual tracking tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3208854     DOI: 10.1007/bf00279669

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  58 in total

1.  Movements in monkeys with deafferented forelimbs.

Authors:  H D KNAPP; E TAUB; A J BERMAN
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1963-04       Impact factor: 5.330

2.  Dentate cooling in monkeys performing a visuo-motor pointing task.

Authors:  D Beaubaton; E Trouche; G Amato; A Grangetto
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Velocity characteristics of smooth pursuit eye movements to different patterns of target motion.

Authors:  A Buizza; R Schmid
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neuronal responses to eye muscle stretch in cerebellar lobule VI of the cat.

Authors:  D W Schwarz; R D Tomlinson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1977-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  The upper limit of human smooth pursuit velocity.

Authors:  C H Meyer; A G Lasker; D A Robinson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Effects of dentate cooling on rapid alternating arm movements.

Authors:  B Conrad; V B Brooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  [Influence of the cerebellum on ocular statics and visual tracking movements (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Larmande; M P Delplace; A Autret
Journal:  Rev Neurol (Paris)       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 2.607

8.  Effects of cerebellar lesions on saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  L Ritchie
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cerebellar nuclear topography of simple and synergistic movements in the alert baboon (Papio papio).

Authors:  L Rispal-Padel; F Cicirata; C Pons
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Specific oculomotor deficit after diazepam. I. Saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  S J Rothenberg; D Selkoe
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  24 in total

1.  Cerebellar Purkinje cell simple spike discharge encodes movement velocity in primates during visuomotor arm tracking.

Authors:  J D Coltz; M T Johnson; T J Ebner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  The role of the cerebellum in preparing responses to predictable sensory events.

Authors:  Philip D Nixon
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.847

3.  Oculo-manual coordination control: ocular and manual tracking of visual targets with delayed visual feedback of the hand motion.

Authors:  J L Vercher; G M Gauthier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cerebellar TMS evokes a long latency motor response in the hand during a visually guided manual tracking task.

Authors:  Koichi Hiraoka; Kenichi Horino; Atsuko Yagura; Akiyoshi Matsugi
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Eye movements coordinated with steering benefit performance even when vision is denied.

Authors:  M Wilson; S Stephenson; M Chattington; D E Marple-Horvat
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-05       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Purkinje cells in the lateral cerebellum of the cat encode visual events and target motion during visually guided reaching.

Authors:  Omür Budanur Miles; Nadia L Cerminara; Dilwyn E Marple-Horvat
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Non-invasive cerebellar stimulation--a consensus paper.

Authors:  G Grimaldi; G P Argyropoulos; A Boehringer; P Celnik; M J Edwards; R Ferrucci; J M Galea; S J Groiss; K Hiraoka; P Kassavetis; E Lesage; M Manto; R C Miall; A Priori; A Sadnicka; Y Ugawa; U Ziemann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Long latency electromyographic response induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation over the cerebellum preferentially appears during continuous visually guided manual tracking task.

Authors:  Akiyoshi Matsugi; Yasuyuki Iwata; Nobuhiko Mori; Hiroshi Horino; Koichi Hiraoka
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  LRP predicts smooth pursuit eye movement onset during the ocular tracking of self-generated movements.

Authors:  Jing Chen; Matteo Valsecchi; Karl R Gegenfurtner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Augmenting sensorimotor control using "goal-aware" vibrotactile stimulation during reaching and manipulation behaviors.

Authors:  Emmanouil Tzorakoleftherakis; Todd D Murphey; Robert A Scheidt
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.