Literature DB >> 32086869

Quality indicators in colonoscopy: an evolving paradigm.

Rebecca Shine1, Andrew Bui2, Adele Burgess2.   

Abstract

The year 1969 marked a revolution in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). It is when Dr Wolff developed the colonoscope and quickly realized its potential in both diagnosis and treatment of colonic neoplasms. Over the past 50 years there has been exponential increase in utilization of colonoscopy with over 1 million colonoscopies performed annually throughout Australasia. Endoscopic removal of pre-malignant lesions has been proven to reduce the incidence and mortality of colorectal. Although timing and frequency of surveillance colonoscopy plays a crucial role in risk reduction of CRC, this is dependent upon the findings of the index colonoscopy. The goal of screening colonoscopy is to detect CRC and identify and remove pre-malignant neoplasms that risk progression to CRC. With increasing uptake of bowel screening throughout Australasia, there is increasing pressure to ensure all endoscopists and endoscopy units perform at a universal high-quality. All too often high demand and constant delays compromise colonoscopy quality. Without clear and concise quality indicators with transparent measurement and audit, these flaws can quickly jeopardize screening goals and patient outcomes. This review aims to explore six key quality indicators and explore the evidence behind the current recommended standards. These key indicators include; rate of adequate bowel preparation, caecal intubation rate, adenoma detection rate, withdrawal time, complication rates and surveillance intervals.
© 2020 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  colonoscopy; national standard; quality indicator

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32086869     DOI: 10.1111/ans.15775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ANZ J Surg        ISSN: 1445-1433            Impact factor:   1.872


  4 in total

1.  Open-access colonoscopy quality indicators and patient perception using split-dose bowel preparation.

Authors:  Nihita Manem; Katherine Donovan; David Miller; Michael Yodice; Katie Wang; Khadijat Balogun; Ghassan Kabbach; Paul Feustel; Micheal Tadros
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Split-dose 1 L polyethylene glycol (PEG) with ascorbate is non-inferior to split-dose PEG with sodium picosulfate and magnesium citrate with similar tolerability: a randomized study.

Authors:  Kumanan Nalankilli; David J Gibson; Shahzaib Anwar; Danny Con; Helen Chen; Robyn Secomb; Peter Gibson; Gregor Brown
Journal:  JGH Open       Date:  2021-08-17

3.  Effect of nurse-performed enhanced patient education on colonoscopy bowel preparation quality.

Authors:  Gamze Arslanca; Mahmure Aygün
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2022

4.  Quality indicators of colonoscopy care: a qualitative study from the perspectives of colonoscopy participants and nurses.

Authors:  Wenwen Cai; Xingxing Zhang; Yanxia Luo; Minshan Ye; Yu Guo; Weiqing Ruan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 2.908

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.