Literature DB >> 32086583

A quantitative imaging biomarker for predicting disease-free-survival-associated histologic subgroups in lung adenocarcinoma.

Lin Lu1, Deling Wang2, Lili Wang3, Linning E4, Pingzhen Guo1, Zhiming Li5, Jin Xiang6, Hao Yang1, Hui Li2, Shaohan Yin2, Lawrence H Schwartz1, Chuanmiao Xie7, Binsheng Zhao8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Classification of histologic subgroups has significant prognostic value for lung adenocarcinoma patients who undergo surgical resection. However, clinical histopathology assessment is generally performed on only a small portion of the overall tumor from biopsy or surgery. Our objective is to identify a noninvasive quantitative imaging biomarker (QIB) for the classification of histologic subgroups in lung adenocarcinoma patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively collected and reviewed 1313 CT scans of patients with resected lung adenocarcinomas from two geographically distant institutions who were seen between January 2014 and October 2017. Three study cohorts, the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, were created, within which lung adenocarcinomas were divided into two disease-free-survival (DFS)-associated histologic subgroups, the mid/poor and good DFS groups. A comprehensive machine learning- and deep learning-based analytical system was adopted to identify reproducible QIBs and help to understand QIBs' significance.
RESULTS: Intensity-Skewness, a QIB quantifying tumor density distribution, was identified as the optimal biomarker for predicting histologic subgroups. Intensity-Skewness achieved high AUCs (95% CI) of 0.849(0.813,0.881), 0.820(0.781,0.856) and 0.863(0.827,0.895) on the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts, respectively. A criterion of Intensity-Skewness ≤ 1.5, which indicated high tumor density, showed high specificity of 96% (sensitivity 46%) and 99% (sensitivity 53%) on predicting the mid/poor DFS group in the training and external validation cohorts, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: A QIB derived from routinely acquired CT was able to predict lung adenocarcinoma histologic subgroups, providing a noninvasive method that could potentially benefit personalized treatment decision-making for lung cancer patients. KEY POINTS: • A noninvasive imaging biomarker, Intensity-Skewness, which described the distortion of pixel-intensity distribution within lesions on CT images, was identified as a biomarker to predict disease-free-survival-associated histologic subgroups in lung adenocarcinoma. • An Intensity-Skewness of ≤ 1.5 has high specificity in predicting the mid/poor disease-free survival histologic patient group in both the training cohort and the external validation cohort. • The Intensity-Skewness is a feature that can be automatically computed with high reproducibility and robustness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adenocarcinoma of lung; Deep learning; Histological types of neoplasms; Machine learning; Tomography, X-ray computed

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32086583      PMCID: PMC9039366          DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06663-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  34 in total

1.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 2.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Radiomics machine-learning signature for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with indeterminate liver nodules.

Authors:  Fatima-Zohra Mokrane; Lin Lu; Adrien Vavasseur; Philippe Otal; Jean-Marie Peron; Lyndon Luk; Hao Yang; Samy Ammari; Yvonne Saenger; Herve Rousseau; Binsheng Zhao; Lawrence H Schwartz; Laurent Dercle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Comparison of a radiomic biomarker with volumetric analysis for decoding tumour phenotypes of lung adenocarcinoma with different disease-specific survival.

Authors:  Mei Yuan; Yu-Dong Zhang; Xue-Hui Pu; Yan Zhong; Hai Li; Jiang-Fen Wu; Tong-Fu Yu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Subtype Classification of Lung Adenocarcinoma Predicts Benefit From Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients Undergoing Complete Resection.

Authors:  Ming-Sound Tsao; Sophie Marguet; Gwénaël Le Teuff; Sylvie Lantuejoul; Frances A Shepherd; Lesley Seymour; Robert Kratzke; Stephen L Graziano; Helmut H Popper; Rafael Rosell; Jean-Yves Douillard; Thierry Le-Chevalier; Jean-Pierre Pignon; Jean-Charles Soria; Elisabeth M Brambilla
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Lung Adenocarcinoma: Correlation of Quantitative CT Findings with Pathologic Findings.

Authors:  Jane P Ko; James Suh; Opeyemi Ibidapo; Joanna G Escalon; Jinyu Li; Harvey Pass; David P Naidich; Bernard Crawford; Emily B Tsai; Chi Wan Koo; Artem Mikheev; Henry Rusinek
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Predicting Malignant Nodules from Screening CT Scans.

Authors:  Samuel Hawkins; Hua Wang; Ying Liu; Alberto Garcia; Olya Stringfield; Henry Krewer; Qian Li; Dmitry Cherezov; Robert A Gatenby; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Dmitry Goldgof; Matthew B Schabath; Lawrence Hall; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 15.609

8.  Improving Computer-Aided Detection Using Convolutional Neural Networks and Random View Aggregation.

Authors:  Holger R Roth; Le Lu; Jiamin Liu; Jianhua Yao; Ari Seff; Kevin Cherry; Lauren Kim; Ronald M Summers
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Fleischner recommendations for the management of subsolid pulmonary nodules: high awareness but limited conformance - a survey study.

Authors:  Onno M Mets; Pim A de Jong; Kaman Chung; Jan-Willem J Lammers; Bram van Ginneken; Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  A Response Assessment Platform for Development and Validation of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology.

Authors:  Hao Yang; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  Identifying Robust Radiomics Features for Lung Cancer by Using In-Vivo and Phantom Lung Lesions.

Authors:  Lin Lu; Shawn H Sun; Aaron Afran; Hao Yang; Zheng Feng Lu; James So; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-02-09

Review 2.  Understanding Sources of Variation to Improve the Reproducibility of Radiomics.

Authors:  Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.244

3.  Uncontrolled Confounders May Lead to False or Overvalued Radiomics Signature: A Proof of Concept Using Survival Analysis in a Multicenter Cohort of Kidney Cancer.

Authors:  Lin Lu; Firas S Ahmed; Oguz Akin; Lyndon Luk; Xiaotao Guo; Hao Yang; Jin Yoon; A Aari Hakimi; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  Radiomics Prediction of EGFR Status in Lung Cancer-Our Experience in Using Multiple Feature Extractors and The Cancer Imaging Archive Data.

Authors:  Lin Lu; Shawn H Sun; Hao Yang; Linning E; Pingzhen Guo; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2020-06

5.  Convolutional Neural Network Addresses the Confounding Impact of CT Reconstruction Kernels on Radiomics Studies.

Authors:  Jin H Yoon; Shawn H Sun; Manjun Xiao; Hao Yang; Lin Lu; Yajun Li; Lawrence H Schwartz; Binsheng Zhao
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2021-12-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.