Literature DB >> 32085436

On-Ground Vineyard Reconstruction Using a LiDAR-Based Automated System.

Hugo Moreno1, Constantino Valero2, José María Bengochea-Guevara1, Ángela Ribeiro1, Miguel Garrido-Izard2, Dionisio Andújar1.   

Abstract

Crop 3D modeling allows site-specific management at different crop stages. In recent years, light detection and ranging (LiDAR) sensors have been widely used for gathering information about plant architecture to extract biophysical parameters for decision-making programs. The study reconstructed vineyard crops using light detection and ranging (LiDAR) technology. Its accuracy and performance were assessed for vineyard crop characterization using distance measurements, aiming to obtain a 3D reconstruction. A LiDAR sensor was installed on-board a mobile platform equipped with an RTK-GNSS receiver for crop 2D scanning. The LiDAR system consisted of a 2D time-of-flight sensor, a gimbal connecting the device to the structure, and an RTK-GPS to record the sensor data position. The LiDAR sensor was facing downwards installed on-board an electric platform. It scans in planes perpendicular to the travel direction. Measurements of distance between the LiDAR and the vineyards had a high spatial resolution, providing high-density 3D point clouds. The 3D point cloud was obtained containing all the points where the laser beam impacted. The fusion of LiDAR impacts and the positions of each associated to the RTK-GPS allowed the creation of the 3D structure. Although point clouds were already filtered, discarding points out of the study area, the branch volume cannot be directly calculated, since it turns into a 3D solid cluster that encloses a volume. To obtain the 3D object surface, and therefore to be able to calculate the volume enclosed by this surface, a suitable alpha shape was generated as an outline that envelops the outer points of the point cloud. The 3D scenes were obtained during the winter season when only branches were present and defoliated. The models were used to extract information related to height and branch volume. These models might be used for automatic pruning or relating this parameter to evaluate the future yield at each location. The 3D map was correlated with ground truth, which was manually determined, pruning the remaining weight. The number of scans by LiDAR influenced the relationship with the actual biomass measurements and had a significant effect on the treatments. A positive linear fit was obtained for the comparison between actual dry biomass and LiDAR volume. The influence of individual treatments was of low significance. The results showed strong correlations with actual values of biomass and volume with R2 = 0.75, and when comparing LiDAR scans with weight, the R2 rose up to 0.85. The obtained values show that this LiDAR technique is also valid for branch reconstruction with great advantages over other types of non-contact ranging sensors, regarding a high sampling resolution and high sampling rates. Even narrow branches were properly detected, which demonstrates the accuracy of the system working on difficult scenarios such as defoliated crops.

Entities:  

Keywords:  laser measurements; plant volume estimation; vineshoot volume; vineyard proximal sensing

Year:  2020        PMID: 32085436     DOI: 10.3390/s20041102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.576


  9 in total

1.  Semantic Segmentation of Natural Materials on a Point Cloud Using Spatial and Multispectral Features.

Authors:  Juan M Jurado; José L Cárdenas; Carlos J Ogayar; Lidia Ortega; Francisco R Feito
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Evaluation of Vineyard Cropping Systems Using On-Board RGB-Depth Perception.

Authors:  Hugo Moreno; Victor Rueda-Ayala; Angela Ribeiro; Jose Bengochea-Guevara; Juan Lopez; Gerassimos Peteinatos; Constantino Valero; Dionisio Andújar
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Assessing the Capability and Potential of LiDAR for Weed Detection.

Authors:  Nooshin Shahbazi; Michael B Ashworth; J Nikolaus Callow; Ajmal Mian; Hugh J Beckie; Stuart Speidel; Elliot Nicholls; Ken C Flower
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Estimation of Characteristic Parameters of Grape Clusters Based on Point Cloud Data.

Authors:  Wentao Liu; Chenglin Wang; Weilin Chen; Lufeng Luo
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  Three-dimensional reconstruction and phenotype measurement of maize seedlings based on multi-view image sequences.

Authors:  Yuchao Li; Jingyan Liu; Bo Zhang; Yonggang Wang; Jingfa Yao; Xuejing Zhang; Baojiang Fan; Xudong Li; Yan Hai; Xiaofei Fan
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  A Lightweight Localization Strategy for LiDAR-Guided Autonomous Robots with Artificial Landmarks.

Authors:  Sen Wang; Xiaohe Chen; Guanyu Ding; Yongyao Li; Wenchang Xu; Qinglei Zhao; Yan Gong; Qi Song
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  A Low-Cost 3D Phenotype Measurement Method of Leafy Vegetables Using Video Recordings from Smartphones.

Authors:  Zishang Yang; Yuxing Han
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-25       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Automatic Extrinsic Calibration of 3D LIDAR and Multi-Cameras Based on Graph Optimization.

Authors:  Jinshun Ou; Panling Huang; Jun Zhou; Yifan Zhao; Lebin Lin
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-13       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  The Short-Range, High-Accuracy Compact Pulsed Laser Ranging System.

Authors:  Hongbin Ma; Yuan Luo; Yan He; Shiguang Pan; Lihong Ren; Jianhua Shang
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.