| Literature DB >> 32084333 |
Sushant Kumar1, Jonathan Warrell1, Shantao Li1, Patrick D McGillivray2, William Meyerson3, Leonidas Salichos1, Arif Harmanci4, Alexander Martinez-Fundichely5, Calvin W Y Chan6, Morten Muhlig Nielsen7, Lucas Lochovsky1, Yan Zhang8, Xiaotong Li9, Shaoke Lou1, Jakob Skou Pedersen10, Carl Herrmann11, Gad Getz12, Ekta Khurana13, Mark B Gerstein14.
Abstract
The dichotomous model of "drivers" and "passengers" in cancer posits that only a few mutations in a tumor strongly affect its progression, with the remaining ones being inconsequential. Here, we leveraged the comprehensive variant dataset from the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) project to demonstrate that-in addition to the dichotomy of high- and low-impact variants-there is a third group of medium-impact putative passengers. Moreover, we also found that molecular impact correlates with subclonal architecture (i.e., early versus late mutations), and different signatures encode for mutations with divergent impact. Furthermore, we adapted an additive-effects model from complex-trait studies to show that the aggregated effect of putative passengers, including undetected weak drivers, provides significant additional power (∼12% additive variance) for predicting cancerous phenotypes, beyond PCAWG-identified driver mutations. Finally, this framework allowed us to estimate the frequency of potential weak-driver mutations in PCAWG samples lacking any well-characterized driver alterations.Entities:
Keywords: PCAWG; additive-efects; cancer genomics; deleterious passengers; driver mutations; molecular impact; passenger mutations; weak drivers
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32084333 PMCID: PMC7210002 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.01.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell ISSN: 0092-8674 Impact factor: 41.582