Literature DB >> 32082720

First experiences and complications in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy at a thoracic surgery center.

Göktürk Fındık1, Funda İncekara1, Mustafa Demiröz1, Ebru Sayılır1, Kubilay İnan1, Seray Hazer1, Koray Aydoğdu1, Sadi Kaya1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aims to report the difficulties and complications we experienced in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomies performed at our thoracic surgery center.
METHODS: A total of 76 patients (54 males, 22 females; mean age 48.3 years; range 9 to 83 years) who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy between January 2012 and June 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative patient characteristics such as additional diseases or tuberculosis history, stage for malignant diseases, surgical characteristics such as port properties and amount of bleeding, postoperative characteristics such as amount, time and duration of drainage, air leakage, and discharge time, morbidity and mortality rates, and their causes were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of the patients, 35 were evaluated due to benign pulmonary diseases and 41 due to malignant pulmonary diseases. Postoperative prolonged air leakage developed in 14 patients. Of these patients, one was administered thoracotomy and primary repair, three were administered pleurodesis, and three were administered secondary pleurocan catheter, while the air leakage ended spontaneously in seven patients. Due to bleeding, one patient was treated with revision video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery on the same day postoperatively. One patient developed chylothorax and one patient developed pneumonia, which caused respiratory failure.
CONCLUSION: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy is a safe thoracic procedure, which is used for both oncologic and non-oncologic diseases of the lung. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery may be performed by all thoracic surgeons experienced in open thoracic surgery. Thanks to the gained experiences, the rates of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy may improve in all centers.
Copyright © 2018, Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complications; first cases; video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy

Year:  2018        PMID: 32082720      PMCID: PMC7018120          DOI: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.13641

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg        ISSN: 1301-5680            Impact factor:   0.332


  16 in total

1.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Walter J Scott; Mark S Allen; Gail Darling; Bryan Meyers; Paul A Decker; Joe B Putnam; Robert W McKenna; Rodney J Landrenau; David R Jones; Richard I Inculet; Richard A Malthaner
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 2.  New approaches to the minimally invasive treatment of lung cancer.

Authors:  Robert J McKenna; Ward V Houck
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.155

Review 3.  The variability of practice in minimally invasive thoracic surgery for pulmonary resections.

Authors:  Gaetano Rocco; Eveline Internullo; Stephen D Cassivi; Dirk Van Raemdonck; Mark K Ferguson
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.750

4.  Learning thoracoscopic lobectomy.

Authors:  René Horsleben Petersen; Henrik Jessen Hansen
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2009-10-08       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 5.  VATS anatomic lung resections-the European experience.

Authors:  Sofina Begum; Henrik Jessen Hansen; Kostas Papagiannopoulos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Long-term benefits for the quality of life after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  H Sugiura; T Morikawa; M Kaji; Y Sasamura; S Kondo; H Katoh
Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.719

7.  The present role and future considerations of video-assisted thoracoscopy in general thoracic surgery.

Authors:  J I Miller
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) versus thoracotomy for lung cancer.

Authors:  Raja M Flores; Bernard J Park; Joseph Dycoco; Anna Aronova; Yael Hirth; Nabil P Rizk; Manjit Bains; Robert J Downey; Valerie W Rusch
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Lobectomy--video-assisted thoracic surgery versus muscle-sparing thoracotomy. A randomized trial.

Authors:  T J Kirby; M J Mack; R J Landreneau; T W Rice
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 10.  What size chest tube? What drainage system is ideal? And other chest tube management questions.

Authors:  Michael H Baumann
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.155

View more
  2 in total

1.  Analysis of perioperative complications and related risk factors of thoracotomy and complete video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery lobectomy.

Authors:  Hongwei Su; Guorong Yan; Zijian Li; Lin Fu; Lingdi Li
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.940

2.  A different approach in thoracic surgery: Guillotine lobectomy.

Authors:  Hüseyin Yıldıran; Güven Sadi Sunam
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 0.332

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.