| Literature DB >> 32082624 |
Neelima Mahato1, Kavita Sharma1,2, Mukty Sinha3, Ek Raj Baral1, Rakoti Koteswararao3, Archana Dhyani4, Moo Hwan Cho1, Sunghun Cho1.
Abstract
Citrus waste includes peels, pulp and membrane residue and seeds, constituting approximately 40-60% of the whole fruit. This amount exceeds ~110-120 million tons annually worldwide. Recent investigations have been focused on developing newer techniques to explore various applications of the chemicals obtained from the citrus wastes. The organic acids obtained from citrus waste can be utilized in developing biodegradable polymers and functional materials for food processing, chemical and pharmaceutical industries. The peel microstructures have been investigated to create bio-inspired materials. The peel residue can be processed to produce fibers and fabrics, 3D printed materials, carbon nanodots for bio-imaging, energy storage materials and nanostructured materials for various applications so as to leave no waste at all. The article reviews recent advances in scientific investigations to produce valuable products from citrus wastes and possibilities of innovating future materials and promote zero remaining waste for a cleaner environment for future generation.Entities:
Keywords: Biodegradable polymers; Bioelectricity; Biosorbent; Citrus waste derived fibers; Citrus waste management; Limonene based polymers
Year: 2020 PMID: 32082624 PMCID: PMC7021529 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2020.01.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Adv Res ISSN: 2090-1224 Impact factor: 10.479
Fig. 1Basic principle of surface modification of citrus waste derived biosorbent by chemical pre-treatment for the removal of pollutants; Adapted from the reference [33].
Citrus waste derived biosorbent materials obtained from modification by heat/enzyme/chemical pre-treatments for the removal of toxic heavy metals and dyes from industrial effluent waters (BS – Biosorbent; BPT – Biosorbent Pre-treatment; BAT – Batch Adsorption Test; P.S – Particle size; q – Langmuir constant; maximum capacity of the monolayer adsorption (mg g−1/meq g−1); K – Langmuir constant; strength of interaction between the adsorbent and the contaminated solution (L g−1/L mol−1/L meq−1); K – Freundlich constant; interaction strength (L g−1); n – Fraundlich constant; intensity of interaction between the sorbent and sorbate.
| Citrus waste part | Heavy metals/Dyes | Biosorbent pretreatment | Results/Remarks | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heavy Metals | ||||
| Peels ( | Nickel, Cadmium, Lead from | Wash; Sundry; Grind, P.S. −250 µm; | Rice soaked with ACPA showed maximum reduction in heavy metal concentration | |
| Orange peel | Cadmium, Aluminium, Copper, Zinc, Nickel, Lead | Wash; Dry, 110 °C, 3d; Grind, P.S. −0.074 mm; | Maximum adsorption capacity order: Pb (~90%) > Cd (~90%) > Cu (~90%) > Ni (75%) > Zn (~75%) > Al (~65%) | |
| Orange peels | Cadmium, Copper, Lead | Wash; Sun dry, 6d; Grind, P.S. – 0.2 mm | Maximum adsorption of | |
| Orange peels | Lead, Cadmium, Zinc | Wash; Dry; Grind, P.S. – 1–2 mm; | Pb (85 mg g−1) > Cd (44 mg g−1) > Zn (20 mg g−1) | |
| Zinc, Nickel | Wash; Dry, 50 °C till const. weight; Grind, P.S. 0.5–1.0 mm | Native Peel BS- | ||
| Citrus peel pectin | Lead | Citrus peel pectins; | LM Pectin − 0.86 m mol g−1 | |
| Citrus lemon | Cobalt | Wash; Dry, 80 °C, 24 h; Grind | Maximum adsorption capacity | |
| Orange waste | Lead | Wash; Dry, 60 °C; Grind, Sieve- BS-100 mesh | Maximum adsorption capacity | |
| Orange peels (OP), Lemon Peels (LP), | Cadmium | Native orange and Lemon peels → Wash, Dry-38–40 °C, 12 h; Grind | Langmuir sorption capacities- 0.7–1.2 meq. g−1 (39–67 mg g−1) | |
| Lemon Peel | Cobalt | Wash; Dry-60 °C, 24 h; Grind: PS-1 mm- RLP (Raw Lemon Peel) | Max. adsorption capacity | |
| Mercury ion removal | GO (35 g) + Na2S2O3 (64 mg) + 50 ml DI → Sonication, 1 h, Add 10 ml of | 90% Hg2+ removal in first 15 min. Complete removal in 30 min | ||
| Acid Yellow-73 | Wash; Sun dry-7d; Grind; Sieve through 50 ASTM mesh | Maximum adsorption capacity | ||
| Congo Red, | Wash; Sun dry-7d; Grind- PS: 75–500 µm | Maximum adsorption capacity | ||
| Grapefruit peels | Methylene Blue | Wash; Sun dry-2d; Grind- PS > 90 µm | Maximum adsorption capacity | |
| Orange Peel | Direct Yellow-12 | Wash; Dry-150 °C, 5 h; Grind | Maximum removal is 96% from 125 mg L−1 of dye concentration with adsorbent concentration of 5 mg L−1 | |
| Grapefruit Peels | Crystal Violet | Wash; Dry-150 °C, 5 h; Grind | 96% removal in 60 min; | |
| Pomelo Peel | Methylene Blue (Cationic Dye); Acid Blue (Anionic Dye) | Wash; Air dry; Grind-PS: 1.0–2.0 mm | Maximum adsorption capacity | |
| Methylene Blue | Wash; Dry-60 °C, 72 h; Grind-PS: 0.25–0.75 mm | Maximum adsorption capacity | ||
| Grapefruit Peel | Leather Dye mixture: Sella Solid Blue, Special Violet, Derma Burdeaux, Sella Solid Orange | Wash; Dry-60 °C, 24 h; Grind-PS: < 0.5 mm | Untreated Grapefruit peel BS → 45% for Dye mixture and 55% for Cr(VI) | |
| Orange peel | Congo Red,Methyl Orange | Wash; Sun dry-72 h; Grind | Maximum adsorption capacity | |
| Remazol Brilliant Blue | Wash, Dry-60 °C, 24 h; Grind: Wash, Dry-60 °C; PS = 44–1180 µm | Maximum adsorption capacity | ||
| Reactive Blue 19, | Wash; Dry; Grind-PS < 0.25 mm- Free BS (BS) | Maximum adsorption capacity | ||
| Lime Peel | Remazol Brilliant Blue R | Wash; Dry-105 °C, 24 h; PS-150 µm | Maximum adsorption capacity of 9.58 mg/g (95.89%) | |
| Orange Peels | Acid violet 17 | Wash; Sun dry-4d; Grind; PS: 53–500 µm | Maximum adsorption capacity | |
| Methylene blue | Wash; Sun dry-4d; Oven dry-90 °C-24 h; Grind; Sieve-80 BSS mesh; Wash; Dry- 105 °C, 4 h; Grind; PS-80–200 BSS | Maximum adsorption capacity | ||
| C.I. Direct Blue 77 dye | Wash; Dry-105 °C; Grind; PS-75 µm | Maximum adsorption capacity | ||
Fig. 2(a) Citric acid cross-linked biodegradable polymers from polysaccharides; (b–c) Biopolymers and important chemicals derived from organic acids, viz., succinic acid and lactic acid [60], [66].
Fig. 3Schematic representation of (a) production of pectin, neohesperidin and limonene from citrus wastes, and (b–e) synthesis of important chemicals and novel biopolymeric materials [76], [79], [80], [81], [84].
Fig. 4Main steps involved in processing the citrus biomass to produce micro and nano-cellulose fibers [86], [91], [99].
Fig. 5Schematic presentation of different uses of citrus processing wastes into valuable products, viz., (a) carbon nanodots from hydrothermal treatment of orange juice and orange peels and their applications in photocatalytic dye degradation in waste waters and (b) bio-imaging; (c) bioelectricity from electrochemically active microbial biofilm; (d) porous carbon materials for supercapacitor electrode material; (e) 3-D printed materials, (f) spun threads for making clothes (g) orange peel extract solution for polystyrene recycling and drug delivery, and (h) bio-inspired materials with excellent damping properties [106], [107], [108], [110]. (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Citrus waste utilization for the production of nanomaterials and their applications.
| Citrus | Synthesis Procedure | Product | Application | Remarks | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Orange peel | Wash, Sundry; Oven dry-150 °C, 10 h-Dried Specimen (DSp) | I-Fluorescent C-dots | Photo- degradation of Naphthol Blue black azo dye | Complete degradation of dye in 45 min. | |
| Pulp free juice –Hydrothermal treatment-120 °C, 150 min | Luminescent carbon dots; 400 mg CDs per 40 ml of juice; Particle size-1.5–4.5 nm | Bio-imaging | Crystalline, non-toxic, exhibit stable photoluminescence, high biocompatibility; PL quantum yield of ~26% | ||
| Pomelo peel | Shred; Soak in boiling water; Hydrothermal treatment- 180 °C-16 h; Wash; Freeze dry; Thermal annealing, 1000 °C, 2 h, NH3 | N-doped nanoporous carbon BET surface area- 1444.9 m2/g; Pore size > 5 nm | Metal free electro-catalyst for oxygen reduction reaction | Cost effective | |
| Pomelo peel | Clean; Freeze dry-2 d; Phosphoric acid treatment-24 h; Freeze dry-48 h; Carbonization-700 °C, 2 h, N2; wash with hot water, dry-80 °C, 12 h | 3D connected porous hard carbon | O-, P functionalized anode material for Sodium ion batteries | Cyclic stability up to 220 cycles; Capacitance of 181 mA h g−1 at 200 mAg−1. After 220 cycles, the capacity drops to 71 mA h g-1 at 5 A g−1 | |
| Orange peel | Wash; Dry- 60 °C, 24 h- Dried peel (DP) | B/N-co-doped porous carbon incorporated with KetjenBlack nano-particles. | Electro-catalyst for Vanadium redox couples of V2+/V3+ and VO2+/VO2+ in flow batteries | Enhanced electrical conductivity; B/N co-doping increase electro-catalytic activity towards vanadium redox couples: onset potential and peak current; | |
| Citrus peel | Wash; Chop; Soak-30 wt% KOH (95%)-30 min; Dry- 80 °C, 36 h; Pyrolysis-800 °C, 2 h, N2 atmosphere; Wash with EtOH, Dry | Citrus peel derived 3D-nanosheet of ~12 nm thickness; Pore size-1–5 nm; Surface area-1167 m2 g−1; C/O ratio-5.5; C/N ratio-34.3 | Cathode material for sodium ion storage | Electrical Conductivity = 26 S cm−1; Specific capacity-140 mA h g−1 at 0.1 A g−1; Stable over 2000 charge/discharge cycles; Symmetrical full cell device using Na+ charge carriers show Specific Capacitance- 110F g−1 and high cyclic performance over 100,000 cycles | |
| Pomelo peels | Carbonization followed by KOH activation | 3D-honeycomb like porous carbon; Specific surface area = 2725 m2g−1 Pore size = 0.7–3.3 nm | Electrode material for supercapacitor | Specific capacitance of 342F g−1 and 171F cm−1 at 0.2 A g−1; Capacitance retention of 62% at 20 A g−1; Cyclic stability over 1000 cycles at 10 A g−1; Energy density of 9.4 W h kg−1 at 1.0 V in 6 M KOH electrolyte | |
| Orange Peel | Orange Peel waste- | Renewable carbon source in a mediatorless microbial fuel cell (MFC) | Bioelectricity generation | Maximum stable voltage of 0.59 ± 0.02 V at 500 Ω; | |
| GO (35 g) + Na2S2O3 (64 mg) + 50 ml DI → Sonication, 1 h, Add 10 ml of Citrus limon juice and stand for 30 min; After equilibration, the mixture is sonicated for 5 min; Washed; Dried at 40 °C; Batch adsorption test were carried out at pH = 6–8 | Sulfur loaded reduced graphene oxide nanohybrid: Particle size ~20 nm | Mercury ion removal | 90% Hg2+ removal in first 15 min. Complete removal in 30 min. | ||
| Grind, Sieve; Particle size = 0.85–1.15 nm; Oven dry = 120 °C- Citrus biomass (CB) | I- Nanocellulose from | Nanocellulose with 55% crystallinity and average diameter of the nanocellulose fibers = 10 nm | Raw material for the preparation of high performance biodegradable nanocomposites | ||
| Wash; Dry; Grind and sieve- 60 mesh size | Nanocellulose from Acid hydrolysis | Crystalline nanocellulose fibers with average diameter = 9.7 nm | Raw material for the preparation of high performance biodegradable nanocomposites |