| Literature DB >> 32082294 |
Jing-Shuai Wu1,2, Guang-Shan Yao1,2,3, Xiao-Hui Shi1,2, Saif Ur Rehman1,2, Ying Xu4, Xiu-Mei Fu1,2, Xiu-Li Zhang1,2, Yang Liu5, Chang-Yun Wang1,2.
Abstract
Epigenetic agents, histone deacetylase inhibitor (SAHA) and DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (5-Aza), were added to Czapek-Dox medium to trigger the chemical diversity of marine-derived fungus Aspergillus versicolor XS-20090066. By HPLC and 1H NMR analysis, the diversity of fungal secondary metabolites was significantly increased compared with the control. With the aid of MS/MS-based molecular networking, two new nucleoside derivatives, kipukasins K (1) and L (2) were obtained. Meanwhile, the yields of four known nucleoside derivatives were significantly enhanced. In addition, one new bisabolane sesquiterpene, aspergillusene E (7), along with ten known derivatives were also isolated. The structures were elucidated by comprehensive spectroscopic methods of NMR and HRESIMS analysis. Compounds 1 and 7 displayed antibacterial activities against Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus with the MIC values of 8-16 μg/mL. Our study revealed that the fungus A. versicolor XS-20090066 has been effectively induced by chemical epigenetic manipulation with a combination of SAHA and 5-Aza to produce new metabolites.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus versicolor; DNA methyltransferase inhibitor; antibacterial activities; antifouling activities; bisabolane sesquiterpenes; histone deacetylase inhibitor; nucleoside derivatives
Year: 2020 PMID: 32082294 PMCID: PMC7002437 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00085
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
1H NMR and 13C NMR data for 1 and 2a.
| 2 | 151.2, C | 150.9, C | ||
| 4 | 163.5, C | 163.5, C | ||
| 5 | 102.8, CH | 5.60, d (8.1) | 102.8, CH | 5.57, d (8.1) |
| 6 | 141.1, CH | 7.67, d (8.1) | 141.7, CH | 7.71, d (8.1) |
| 1′ | 88.9, CH | 5.82, d (6.2) | 87.4, CH | 5.98, d (5.5) |
| 2′ | 71.3, CH | 4.52, d (5.7) | 74.8, CH | 5.39, m |
| 3′ | 72.9, CH | 5.32, dd (5.7, 4.0) | 68.8, CH | 4.36, t (5.9) |
| 4′ | 79.8, CH | 4.37, dt (5.5, 4.0) | 82.3, CH | 4.07, m |
| 5′ | 64.0, CH2 | 4.44, dd (12.0, 5.5) | 63.9, CH2 | 4.49, dd (12.0, 3.6) |
| 4.53, td (12.0, 4.0) | 4.33, td (12.0, 5.9) | |||
| 1″ | 113.9, C | 113.6, C | ||
| 2″ | 160.4, C | 160.4, C | ||
| 3″ | 97.5, CH | 6.31, d (2.1) | 97.5, CH | 6.25, d (1.8) |
| 4″ | 159.0, C | 159.1, C | ||
| 5″ | 109.6, CH | 6.26, d (2.1) | 109.6, CH | 6.20, d (1.8) |
| 6″ | 138.7, C | 138.7, C | ||
| 7″ | 167.1, C | 166.8, C | ||
| 8″ | 20.1, CH3 | 2.21, s | 20.1, CH3 | 2.14, s |
| 9″ | 56.2, CH3 | 3.70, s | 56.2, CH3 | 3.62, s |
| 1″′ | 120.4, C | 120.4, C | ||
| 2″′ | 116.9, CH | 7.40, d (2.1) | 116.9, CH | 7.33, d (2.1) |
| 3″′ | 145.9, C | 145.8, C | ||
| 4″′ | 151.6, C | 151.5, C | ||
| 5″′ | 116.0, CH | 6.83, d (8.3) | 115.9, CH | 6.78, d (8.3) |
| 6″′ | 122.5, CH | 7.35, dd (8.3, 2.1) | 122.5, CH | 7.31, dd (8.3, 2.1) |
| 7″′ | 166.0, C | 166.0, C | ||
1H NMR and 13C NMR data for 7a.
| 2 | 154.5, C | |
| 3 | 109.5, C | |
| 3a | 129.1, C | |
| 4 | 118.7, CH | 7.40, d (7.8) |
| 5 | 121.4, CH | 7.15, dd (7.8, 1.5) |
| 6 | 138.8, C | |
| 7 | 108.9, CH | 7.34, d (1.5) |
| 7a | 153.8, C | |
| 8 | 24.0, CH2 | 2.73, t (7.1) |
| 9 | 37.2, CH2 | 1.53, m |
| 10 | 27.5, CH | 1.53, m |
| 11 | 22.7, CH3 | 0.91, d (5.4) |
| 12 | 22.7, CH3 | 0.91, d (5.4) |
| 13 | 8.1, CH3 | 2.13, s |
| 14 | 63.5, CH2 | 4.56, s |
FIGURE 1HPLC profiles of EtOAc extracts of A. versicolor XS-20090066 with epigenetic agents.
FIGURE 21H NMR spectra of EtOAc extracts of A. versicolor XS-20090066 measured in CDCl3 with 500 MHz, chemical shifts (δ) presented in ppm.
FIGURE 3Molecular networking of A. versicolor XS-20090066 treated with SAHA (yellow), 5-Aza (pink) and both of them (green), as well as the control (gray). The clusters marked are annotated as the GNPS (Global Natural Products Social Molecular Networking Web site) library matched compounds and their derivatives, and the cluster of interest is enlarged. The thickness of edges between the nodes indicates the degree of similarity between their respective MS2 spectra.
FIGURE 4The structures of compounds 1–17.
FIGURE 5The key 1H–1H COSY and HMBC correlations of compounds 1, 2, and 7.