Literature DB >> 32080802

Impact of attenuation correction for CZT-SPECT measurement of myocardial blood flow.

Matthieu Bailly1, Frédérique Thibault2,3, Maxime Courtehoux3, Gilles Metrard2, Maria Joao Ribeiro3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Most of cardiac dedicated CZT-SPECT systems are not equipped with CT, whereas PET systems are. We evaluated the impact of AC correction on CZT-SPECT myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) measurements.
METHODS: 104 patients were included. SPECT data were acquired on cadmium zinc telluride (CZT)-based pinhole cardiac camera in listmode using a stress (250 ± 17 MBq)/rest (511 ± 23 MBq) 1-day Tc-99m-tetrofosmin protocol. Low-dose CT was acquired on another SPECT/CT camera in the same position. All analysis was performed using Corridor4DM.
RESULTS: Stress and rest MBF were significantly lower when AC was applied (P < 0.001). For regional and global MFR, there was no significant difference between AC and NAC measurements (P > 0.25 at least). Mean global LV MFR was 2.43 ± 0.87 and 2.33 ± 0.89, respectively, for NAC and AC measurements. Using a threshold of 2, 86 patients (83%) remained classified as normal and abnormal regarding global LV MFR whether AC was applied or not. Mean difference between NAC and AC values for the 18 other patients was 0.3.
CONCLUSION: AC correction does not significantly affect MFR measurement both in regional and global LV analyses.
© 2020. American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SPECT; attenuation correction; coronary artery disease; flow reserve

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32080802     DOI: 10.1007/s12350-020-02075-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol        ISSN: 1071-3581            Impact factor:   5.952


  7 in total

1.  Intersoftware variability impacts classification of cardiac PET exams.

Authors:  Joaquim Barreto Oliveira; Yew Min Sen; Kshama Wechalekar
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-09-20       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Coronary flow and flow reserve by PET simplified for clinical applications using rubidium-82 or nitrogen-13-ammonia.

Authors:  K Yoshida; N Mullani; K L Gould
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.057

3.  Software reproducibility of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve quantification in ischemic heart disease: A 13N-ammonia PET study.

Authors:  Andrea G Monroy-Gonzalez; Luis Eduardo Juarez-Orozco; Chunlei Han; Issi R Vedder; David Vállez García; Ronald Borra; Piotr J Slomka; Sergey V Nesterov; Juhani Knuuti; Riemer H J A Slart; Erick Alexanderson-Rosas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPET in patients of normal body mass index.

Authors:  Mohamed Shawgi; Christine M Tonge; Richard S Lawson; Sivakumar Muthu; Jacqueline James; Parthiban Arumugam
Journal:  Hell J Nucl Med       Date:  2012 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 1.102

5.  Comparison between N13NH3-PET and 99mTc-Tetrofosmin-CZT SPECT in the evaluation of absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve.

Authors:  Raffaele Giubbini; Mattia Bertoli; Rexhep Durmo; Mattia Bonacina; Alessia Peli; Ilio Faggiano; Domenico Albano; Elisa Milan; Eli Stern; Barbara Paghera; Carlo Rodella; Elisabetta Cerudelli; Marina Gazzilli; Francesco Dondi; Francesco Bertagna; Luca Camoni
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.952

6.  The additional prognostic value of myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients with known coronary artery disease with high exercise capacity.

Authors:  Thais R Peclat; Ana Carolina do A H de Souza; Victor F Souza; Aline M K Nakamoto; Felipe M Neves; Izabella C R Silva; Ronaldo S L Lima
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of PET-derived myocardial blood flow parameters: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sang-Geon Cho; Soo Jin Lee; Myung Hwan Na; Yun Young Choi; Henry Hee-Seung Bom
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 5.952

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  Accuracy and Reproducibility of Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification by Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Imaging in Patients With Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Ana Carolina do A H de Souza; Hendrik J Harms; Laurel Martell; Courtney Bibbo; Meagan Harrington; Kyle Sullivan; Jon Hainer; Sharmila Dorbala; Ron Blankstein; Viviany R Taqueti; Marie Foley Kijewski; Mi-Ae Park; Alejandro Meretta; Christopher Breault; Nathaniel Roth; Alexis Poitrasson-Rivière; Prem Soman; Grant T Gullberg; Marcelo F Di Carli
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 8.589

Review 2.  2022 ASNC/AAPM/SCCT/SNMMI guideline for the use of CT in hybrid nuclear/CT cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Mouaz H Al-Mallah; Timothy M Bateman; Kelley R Branch; Andrew Crean; Eric L Gingold; Randall C Thompson; Sarah E McKenney; Edward J Miller; Venkatesh L Murthy; Koen Nieman; Todd C Villines; Michael V Yester; Andrew J Einstein; John J Mahmarian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2022-09-02       Impact factor: 3.872

3.  Myocardial Flow Reserve Measurement During CZT-SPECT Perfusion Imaging for Coronary Artery Disease Screening: Correlation With Clinical Findings and Invasive Coronary Angiography-The CFR-OR Study.

Authors:  Matthieu Bailly; Frédérique Thibault; Maxime Courtehoux; Gilles Metrard; Denis Angoulvant; Maria Joao Ribeiro
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.