| Literature DB >> 32080302 |
Noura El-Ahmady El-Naggar1, Mervat H Hussein2, Sami A Shaaban-Dessuuki2, Shimaa R Dalal2.
Abstract
Chlorella vulgaris, like a wide range of other microEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32080302 PMCID: PMC7033187 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59945-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Chemical composition of Chlorella vulgaris soluble polysaccharides (mg g−1).
| Total protein | Total carbohydrates | Sulphate content | Uronic acid | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32.993 ± 1.656 | 495.443 ± 4.497 | 210.654 ± 2.021 | 171.97 ± 1.861 | ||
| 3.808 | 81.289 | 7.578 | 7.32 | 19.41 | 14.1 |
Figure 1(A) UV – absorbance spectrum of aqueous solution of soluble polysaccharide extracted from Chlorella vulgaris, (B) FT-IR characterization of Chloella vulgaris soluble polysaccharide solution.
Figure 2(A) Reducing capacity of Chloella vulgaris soluble polysaccharides. (B) Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), DSC and (C) X-ray diffraction of extracted Chloella vulgaris soluble polysaccharides solution.
Figure 3(A) Viscosity as a function of shear rate, (B) flow curve of the shear stress vs. shear rate, (C) log-log plot of the viscosity vs. shear rate, (D) rheogram of the Torque vs. spindle speed, (E) rheogram of the viscosity dependence of spindle speed (RPM) for aqueous solutions of Chlorella vulgaris PS at concentrations 5, 10 and 15 mg PS/mL.
Figure 4(A) Biosynthesized Chloella vulgaris soluble polysaccharide solution /silver nanoparticles and soluble polysaccharide control, (B) UV-absorbance spectrum of silver nanoparticles.
Figure 5FT-IR characterization of silver nanoparticles.
Figure 6(A) TEM and (B) SEM electron micrograph picture of silver nanoparticles.
Figure 7(A) Energy dispersive X-ray analysis (EDX) and (B) ZETA potential of silver nanoparticles.
Figure 8Effect of silver nanoparticles on Bacillus sp., Erwinia sp., Candida sp. (1- AgNPs 2- silver nitrate 3-streptomycin 4-tetracycline 5- penicillin).
Effect of silver nanoparticles on Bacillus sp., Erwinia sp. and Candida sp.
| AgNPs and other antimicrobial agents | Microorganisms/inhibition zone diameter (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| AgNPs | 1.867 ± 0.087 | 1.6 ± 0.058 | 1.433 ± 0.022 |
| AgNO3 | 1.533 ± 0.044 | 1.3 ± 0 | 1.233 ± 0.062 |
| Penicillin | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 | 0 ± 0 |
| Tetracycline | 2.9 ± 0.033 | 2.066 ± 0.029 | 1.7 ± 0 |
| Streptomycin | 2.3 ± 0.058 | 2.7 ± 0.088 | 2.366 ± 0.073 |
Figure 9(A) Wheat (Triticum vulgare) growing seedlings and (B) Phaseolus vulgaris growing seedlings.
Figure 10Priming effect of Chlorella vulgaris polysaccharides (3, 5 mg mL−1) on shoot height and root length (cm), assimilating area (cm2), fresh and dry weights (g) of Triticum vulgare (A) and Phaseolus vulgaris (B) seedlings after germination period of 10 days.
Figure 11Priming effect of Chlorella vulgaris polysaccharides (3, 5 mg mL−1) on photosynthetic pigments content of Triticum vulgare (A) and Phaseolus vulgaris (B) after germination period (10 days).
Priming effect of Chlorella vulgaris polysaccharides (3, 5 mg mL−1) on protein content, carbohydrate content, enzymatic antioxidant activities and total phenolics of Triticum vulgare and Phaseolus vulgaris seedlings after germination period (10 days).
| Polysaccharides | Total protein | Total carbohydrates (mg g−1) | Catalase activity | Peroxidase activity (U/mg) | Total phenolics (mg g−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 29.251 ± 1.653 | 198.154 ± 2.888 | 19.271 ± 0.717 | 19.228 ± 0.535 | 0.021 ± 0.002 |
| 3 mg/mL | 36.125 ± 1.696 | 219.178 ± 3.45 | 21.404 ± 0.728 | 21.525 ± 0.587 | 0.068 ± 0.002 |
| 5 mg/mL | 47.132 ± 1.364 | 235.217 ± 2.833 | 30.62 ± 1.402 | 22.500 ± 0.929 | 0.117 ± 0.008 |
| Control | 55.531 ± 1.966 | 351.213 ± 5.145 | 34.33 ± 0.454 | 22.947 ± 1.403 | 0.346 ± 0.02 |
| 3 mg/mL | 76.124 ± 1.721 | 619.132 ± 2.314 | 45.08 ± 1.113 | 32.291 ± 0.702 | 0.413 ± 0.057 |
| 5 mg/mL | 83.512 ± 3.112 | 637.132 ± 4.625 | 56.698 ± 2.04 | 35.814 ± 1.513 | 0.694 ± 0.01 |