Literature DB >> 32080267

Egg genotyping reveals the possibility of patent Ancylostoma caninum infection in human intestine.

Luis Fernando Viana Furtado1, Lucas Teixeira de Oliveira Dias2, Thais de Oliveira Rodrigues2, Vivian Jordania da Silva2, Valéria Nayara Gomes Mendes de Oliveira2, Élida Mara Leite Rabelo3.   

Abstract

Hookworms are intestinal parasites that cause major public health problems, especially in developing countries. To differentiate eggs from different hookworm species, it is necessary to use molecular methodologies, since the eggs are morphologically similar. Here, we performed the molecular identification of single hookworm eggs from six Brazilian states. Of the 634 eggs individually analyzed, 98.1% (622/634) represented Necator americanus, and surprisingly, 1.9% (12/634 eggs from the same patient) represented Ancylostoma caninum. DNA analysis of the A. caninum-positive stool sample revealed no contamination with animal feces. This is the first report of the presence of A. caninum eggs in human feces, which may have a direct implication for the epidemiology of hookworm infection caused by this species. This suggests the need for special attention regarding prophylaxis, as different reservoirs, previously not described, may have great relevance for the spread of A. caninum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32080267      PMCID: PMC7033205          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59874-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


Introduction

Hookworms affect almost 500 million people worldwide, mainly in developing countries, resulting in a global disease burden of 3.5 million disability-adjusted life years[1,2]. Human ancylostomiasis is caused mainly by the species Ancylostoma duodenale and Necator americanus; A. braziliense parasitize both canids and felids while A. tubaeforme and A. caninum parasitize mainly felids and canids, respectively[3,4]. Among the zoonotic hookworm species, until now, only A. ceylanicum have been shown to cause patent human infections, for which dogs and cats can be reservoirs. These parasites indirectly may cause anaemia, diarrhea, intestinal cramps, and the delayed cognitive and physical development of the host[5,6]. Classically, A. braziliense and A. caninum larvae have been characterized as etiological agents of skin infections in humans known as larva migrans[4]. Ancylostoma caninum also has the ability to cause eosinophilic enteritis in humans[7], and there have been a few reports of the natural parasitism of adult worms of this species in human intestines[8,9]. However, none of these studies have reported sexually mature worms, so egg production has never been detected. In fact, experimental infections in humans with A. caninum resulted in intermittent abdominal pain and eosinophilia, but eggs were not observed in feces at any time[10]. Nevertheless, George and coworkers[11] detected DNA from A. caninum in human feces, suggesting that the role of animals as reservoirs of hookworms in humans may be underestimated and should be investigated. Since hookworms have morphologically similar eggs, many studies have used standardized molecular techniques for hookworm species differentiation in dogs[12,13], cats[14] and humans[15,16]. Additionally, because the eggs are identical, the true prevalence of the hookworm species that affect humans is undetermined in most regions in the world in areas where these parasites are endemic. Therefore, in this work, we aimed to molecularly identify the species of hookworms parasitizing humans. This is of crucial importance because different populations of parasite species are a factor that may affect the prevention strategies used against parasites, since each species may have its own hosts, routes of transmission and pathogenesis[17,18]. In addition, such screenings may help to answer controversial questions about zoonoses[11]. Here, we performed the molecular identification of individual hookworm eggs from six Brazilian states. For the first time, we report the presence of A. caninum eggs in human fecal samples, which indicates an important and neglected epidemiological issue.

Results

We analyzed 634 single hookworm eggs from fecal samples from 53 humans from six Brazilian states by conventional PCR. Of all the eggs analyzed, 98.1% (622/634) were identified as N. americanus, and 1.9% (12/634) were identified as Ancylostoma spp. (all of which were obtained from the same single-parasitized individual from Minas Gerais). The sequencing of the samples identified as Ancylostoma spp. revealed that these eggs were from A. caninum, demonstrating 100% of similarity to the A. caninum sequences available in the GenBank database (Accession numbers: KP844730.1; DQ438075.1; DQ438071.1). To determine the presence of possible contamination from dog and cat samples, DNA extraction of the A. caninum-positive feces was performed. By using conventional PCR and subsequent sequencing, it was possible to determine that the sample had only human DNA; therefore, there was no evidence of contamination with animal feces. Figures 1 and 2 show representative agarose gels from the analyses of the molecular identification of hookworms and hosts, respectively.
Figure 1

Representative PCR results from the molecular identification of single hookworm eggs. In lanes 1 and 2, controls were used (lane 1: N. americanus - 250 bp; lane 2: Ancylostoma spp. - 130 bp). Lanes 3 to 27 show the PCR products from single egg DNA (3 to 20: N. americanus; 21 to 27: Ancylostoma spp.). Lane 28 corresponds to the blank control for the reactions. The image shows an agarose gel (1%) that was stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, USA). MW: 100 bp molecular weight.

Figure 2

PCR results from the molecular identification of the host and the assessment of possible contamination. In lanes 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 9, primers were used for amplification of cat (F. catus – 167 bp), dog (C. familiaris – 193 bp) and human (H. sapiens – 162 bp) DNA, respectively. In lanes 1, 4 and 7, positive controls were used (lane 1: F. catus; lane 4: C. familiaris; lane 7: H. sapiens). Lanes 2, 5 and 8 show the PCR products from DNA extracted from feces positive for A. caninum. Lanes 3, 6 and 9 correspond to the blank controls for the reactions. The image shows an agarose gel (1%) that was stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, USA). MW: 100 bp molecular weight. The lack of fecal DNA amplification in lanes 2 and 5 indicates there was no contamination with animal fecal samples.

Representative PCR results from the molecular identification of single hookworm eggs. In lanes 1 and 2, controls were used (lane 1: N. americanus - 250 bp; lane 2: Ancylostoma spp. - 130 bp). Lanes 3 to 27 show the PCR products from single egg DNA (3 to 20: N. americanus; 21 to 27: Ancylostoma spp.). Lane 28 corresponds to the blank control for the reactions. The image shows an agarose gel (1%) that was stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, USA). MW: 100 bp molecular weight. PCR results from the molecular identification of the host and the assessment of possible contamination. In lanes 1 to 3, 4 to 6, and 7 to 9, primers were used for amplification of cat (F. catus – 167 bp), dog (C. familiaris – 193 bp) and human (H. sapiens – 162 bp) DNA, respectively. In lanes 1, 4 and 7, positive controls were used (lane 1: F. catus; lane 4: C. familiaris; lane 7: H. sapiens). Lanes 2, 5 and 8 show the PCR products from DNA extracted from feces positive for A. caninum. Lanes 3, 6 and 9 correspond to the blank controls for the reactions. The image shows an agarose gel (1%) that was stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, USA). MW: 100 bp molecular weight. The lack of fecal DNA amplification in lanes 2 and 5 indicates there was no contamination with animal fecal samples.

Discussion

Hookworms are important nematodes in both human and veterinary medicine[3,4]. Since eggs of different hookworm species have similar morphology, diagnosis is routinely and generically provided as hookworm only[5]. Knowledge of the species in question is fundamental for determining the true prevalence of various parasites as well as for adopting control measures, such as vaccine production and coverage[18,19]. Here, we molecularly identified hookworm species collected from naturally infected humans from six Brazilian states. Many studies have performed the molecular identification of hookworms from stool samples of dogs[13], cats[14] and humans[15,16]. These studies have performed analyses using different molecular techniques, such as restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP-PCR)[12,20], high resolution melting (HRM)[21], quantitative real-time multiplex PCR[22], single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP)[23] and sequencing[24,25]. All of these studies performed analyses of adult worms and egg/larvae pools. We performed our analyses by conventional PCR by using a method previously standardized by Sahimin and coworkers[16], with some modifications. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to identify hookworm species from single eggs. This is important because individual analysis allows the accurate detection of species, whereas, depending on the sensitivity of the technique, egg/larvae pool analysis can detect only the most prevalent species in the sample. In addition, obtaining adult worms for morphological analysis is unfeasible for obvious reasons. Of the 634 eggs evaluated, 98.1% (622/634) were identified as N. americanus. In fact, according to Loukas and coworkers[5], N. americanus is the predominant human hookworm, which globally accounts for the majority of patent human hookworm cases and is especially common in the Americas. These data corroborate the molecular analyses of Monteiro and coworkers[25], who evaluated hookworm populations in humans in northeastern Brazil. Brooker and coworkers[26], by using morphological analysis, observed that all adult hookworms recovered from populations in southeastern Brazil were N. americanus, while Marzochi and Chieffi[27], by using the morphological analysis of larvae obtained after fecal culture, observed the presence of A. duodenale in 14.2% of the analyzed samples. Studies in other South American countries, such as Ecuador, have also described A. duodenale in the intestines of humans[28]. In the present study, no A. duodenale eggs were detected. Biological characteristics linked to the development of N. americanus explain why this species is the most prevalent. The eggs of this species do not develop at temperatures below 15 °C, and the larvae prefer shady, moist areas with temperatures at or above 30 °C[29]. Ancylostoma ceylanicum, primarily described as a dog and cat nematode, is highly prevalent in humans in Southeast Asia, including Malaysia and Indonesia[30]. Although it has been consistently used as an experimental model for studies in Brazil[31,32], A. ceylanicum has never been described in animal or human populations in this country. However, the migratory flow of tourists and workers to Brazil observed in recent decades must be carefully analyzed, since this migration has already been responsible for introducing A. ceylanicum species to countries in which it had not been previously described[33]. Although many studies conducted worldwide have revealed a high prevalence of A. caninum in canids and felids[13,34], the infection by this species of humans has so far been restricted to skin infections that have mainly been acquired in parks and coastal regions[35]. Nevertheless, our results reveal for the first time the presence of A. caninum eggs in human feces. This may have a direct implication for the epidemiology of human parasitism by this species, since the source of infection could not be restricted to infected animals only. This should be critically studied further, especially since control strategies have been focused on classically described hosts (dogs and cats) in terms of vaccine development and coverage. Indeed, in recent decades, the target glutathione-s-transferase-1 has been studied as a vaccine antigen for N. americanus (Na-GST-1)[36] and A. caninum (Ac-GST-1)[37]. Although this vaccine has resulted in a decreased number of adult worms and fecal eggs in dogs[37], tests of the efficacy of this vaccine in humans have never been performed[36]. Because vaccine targets are species-specific, variation in hookworm species in a geographical region may negatively influence vaccine efficacy. In fact, regional variability may even impact anthelmintic efficacy; mutations involved in drug resistance in A. caninum collected in the field from different regions of Brazil have been described by our group[38]. Although A. caninum eggs have never been observed in human feces, George and coworkers[11] detected DNA from A. caninum in a fecal sample. These studies did not allow us to conclude that the eggs present in the samples were from this species, since the analyses were made based on DNA extraction from feces that also had N. americanus (which has eggs similar to those of A. caninum). According to previous authors, immature forms in the intestines of humans could release DNA into the human intestine, which would be detected by molecular methods. Our analyses, having been performed using DNA from a single egg, allow us to state with confidence that 1.9% (12/634) of the eggs represented Ancylostoma spp., which were identified as A. caninum by sequencing. One hypothesis that could be proposed to explain the presence of A. caninum eggs in human feces would be the ingestion of eggs present in contaminated water and food and the consequent intact excretion of these eggs in feces. This has already been demonstrated in dogs with coprophagic habits, which can excrete Eimeria spp. and non-dog typical helminth eggs[39,40]. This is especially common for plant nematodes that are commonly ingested during human feeding, such as a parasite of the genus Meloidogyne[41], causing infected patients to present with eggs in their feces without completion of the parasite cycle. However, hookworm eggs have a single and very thin membrane that would most likely be destroyed during passage through the stomach of humans[42]. Thus, the morphological characteristics of A. caninum eggs make this hypothesis strongly untenable. In addition, by observing the stage of egg development under optical microscopy, there was an absence of embryonated eggs in the feces. In case of the eggs simply being in transit through the gastrointestinal tract, it would seem probable that they would already be embryonated (see Supplementary Fig. S1). A. caninum eggs found in a single patient sample could suggest contamination with fecal material from dogs and cats. However, DNA extraction from stools followed by molecular analyses to identify possible contaminants, performed in duplicate, revealed that only human DNA was found in the sample. This suggests that the eggs found did not come from the feces of animals infected with A. caninum. It has also to be considered that the potential uptake of animals A. caninum eggs does not necessarily mean that relevant amounts of animals faeces need to be taken up, since eggs may have been attached to food. In fact, many studies report the presence of hookworm eggs in food[43,44] and also in water[45]. However, this a very low probability since twelve A. caninum eggs were found in the respective patient. In addition, some wildlife may be considered A. caninum hosts. Our analyzes from the feces of the patient with A. caninum would not be able to detect DNA from some of these animals, such as coyotes[46]. However, contamination of samples with material from these animals seems unlikely. Unfortunately, we do not have any information regarding the patients, that include data related to the lifestyle habits of individuals, such as domesticated animals and work activities. Since dogs and cats are considered the main definitive hosts of A. caninum, living with infected animals could be a risk factor for the acquisition of the parasite[20], either by causing larva migrans infections or by its development in the human intestine. In addition, work activities such as farm workers and other services that require contact with the soil can be considered a risk factor[34]. It is also important to consider the possibility of human host immunosuppression, since the absence of an effective immune response may have allowed the development and maturation of the nematode in the individual’s intestine. Humans and canines have shared the same evolutionary factors for many centuries, so the domestication of dogs led to the sharing of microbiota, pathogens and even similar eating habits[47]. This may have consequences on parasite transmission and reservoirs, such as Strongyloides, Toxocara, tapeworms and hookworms that can be passed mutually from dogs and humans[48]. Considering that population genetic studies denote a very high phylogenetic proximity between A. caninum, N. americanus and A. duodenale[49], it seems reasonable that evolutionarily A. caninum has acquired the possibility of becoming sexually mature adult in human intestines. In fact, A. ceylanicum is originally a canine and feline parasite, but which over the years has acquired the ability to infect humans[11]. Our results show the possibility of infection and reproduction of A. caninum in the human intestine. We suggest that additional analyses should be performed to determine the infection pathways. According to Landmann and Prociv[10], patients with eosinophilic enteritis caused by A. caninum acquired the infection percutaneously. In fact, migration of the hookworm larvae into skeletal muscles has also been reported in an individual with a large cutaneous exposure, with recovery of third-stage larvae within a muscle fiber[50]. Normally, infection with this nematode occurs by the ingestion of filarioid larvae or penetration of these larvae into the skin of animals[3,4]. To complete their development, larvae need to be able to produce various enzymes involved in connective tissue degradation, such as hyaluronidases, which are often species specific[5,51,52]. Could this indicate the adaptation of the larvae of this species, which in recent times have been able to infect humans? Considering the proximity of the classical hosts to the human species, has A. caninum acquired the ability to develop and reproduce in the intestines of humans, or has this just not been reported so far? These are extremely important questions that may lead to new chapters in the history of parasitology.

Methods

Ethical statements

This work was approved by the Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa – COEP (CAAE 61047216.7.0000.5149) at the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG). As we used human feces obtained from commercial laboratories performing pathological analysis, an informed consent document was not required. We did not obtain any subject identification, and the data were analyzed anonymously.

Sampling and DNA extraction

The stool samples were processed, and DNA extractions were performed for single hookworm eggs from patients collected in six Brazilian states exactly as described previously by Zuccherato and coworkers[53]. The initial isolation of the eggs was performed according to Ritchie[54] with modifications, and samples that were positive for hookworm were stored in 10% formaldehyde for later molecular analysis. In summary, 2 ml of stool suspension was homogenized, filtered through gauze and transferred to a 15 ml tube. Five milliliters of sulfuric ether were added to the suspension and then stirred vigorously, followed by 1 min of centrifugation at 14,000 × g. The supernatant was discarded. Eggs were washed in an additional step by adding 500 μl of 1% hypochlorite for 10 min to the samples. The material was centrifuged at 14,000 × g, and the supernatant was discarded. The eggs were washed again using 500 μl of ultrapure water, followed by centrifugation at 14,000 × g. The supernatant was then discarded. The pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of ultrapure water. For DNA extraction, the eggs were observed under an optical microscope, individually pipetted into a volume of 1 μl and transferred to a 500 μl microcentrifuge tube containing 10 μl of buffer, as described by Lake and coworkers[55]. The eggs were incubated for 2 h at 57 °C, followed by incubation for 20 min at 80 °C for proteinase K inactivation. The material was stored at −20 °C until use. In total, 634 hookworm eggs from 53 patients collected in six Brazilian states were analyzed. Table 1 shows the collection sites, the number of patients and the number of eggs collected from each state.
Table 1

Collection sites and the numbers of patients and eggs used for the molecular identification of hookworm species.

Number of patientsTotal eggsMean number of eggsRange
Bahia69515.814
Ceará99310.37
Maranhão1013513.514
Minas Gerais121239.510
Piauí1011911.912
Tocantins6697.714
Total5363412.021
Collection sites and the numbers of patients and eggs used for the molecular identification of hookworm species.

Differentiation of eggs from N. americanus and Ancylostoma spp

The egg analyses for species determination were performed according to Sahimin and coworkers[16], with some modifications. After DNA extraction from single eggs, conventional PCR was performed with three primers in the same reaction (forward NA and AD1 and reverse NC2). Table 2 shows the sequences of each primer used in this study and the respective reference. These primers were used to amplify a region in the internally transcribed spacer 2 and 28 S ribosomal RNA (ITS2-28S rRNA). The primers NA and AD1 will only anneal to DNA from N. americanus and Ancylostoma spp., respectively, while primer NC2 will anneal to DNA from many hookworm species; the NA + NC2 combination would result in a 250 bp fragment for N. americanus and no amplification for Ancylostoma spp., while the AD1 + NC2 combination would result in a 130 bp fragment for Ancylostoma spp. and no amplification for N. americanus.
Table 2

Primers used for the molecular determination of hookworm and host species.

PrimerSequence (5′–3′)Reference
AD1CGA CTT TAG AAC GTT TCG GCde Gruijter and coworkers[57]
NAATG TGC ACG TTA TTC ACTVerweij and coworkers[58]
NC2TTA GTT TCT TTT CCT CCG CTGasser and coworkers[59]
Camt1FTGT GGC TCA AAC CAT AGC TTCRodrigues and coworkers[60]
Camt1RTGT GGC ATG TCA TTA AGG GGA G
Dmt1FCAC ACC CAC TAC CAT CCA C
Dmt1RGAG GCG GTG CAT AAT GGT T
Hmt2FAAT CAT ACA AAG CCC CCG CA
Hmt2RTGG GGT TAG CGA TGG AGG TA
Primers used for the molecular determination of hookworm and host species. All PCR amplifications were performed in a 10 μl reaction containing the three primers (NA, AD1 and NC2) (0.2 μM each), Taq DNA polymerase (1 U) (Phoneutria, Brazil), deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTPs) (200 μM each), reaction buffer (1X), 5 μl of single egg DNA (not previously quantified to prevent material loss) and ultrapure water. The PCR amplifications were performed according to the following program: 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 1 min, 55 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. A “blank” sample was included in all amplification runs in which the DNA was replaced with water to assess the presence of possible contaminants. The reaction product was subjected to electrophoresis in a 1% agarose gel (w/v) (Midsci, USA) in 0.5X TAE buffer, and the gel was stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, USA).

Controls

DNA from N. americanus and Ancylostoma spp. were previously extracted from adult worms[55,56]. PCRs were performed under the same conditions as previously described above with 40 ng of DNA from each parasite and the primer combinations NA + NC2 (for N. americanus) and AD1 + NC2 (for Ancylostoma spp.) (ITS2-28S rRNA). The products were then purified (Illustra GFX PCR DNA and Gel Band Purification Kit, GE Healthcare, UK), and the DNA concentration was determined. The controls fragments were subsequently cloned using the pGEM-T Easy Vector System (Promega, USA), transformed into XL1-blue cells (Phoneutria, Brazil) and recovered via minipreps (Wizard Plus Miniprep DNA Purification System, Promega, USA). The plasmids were sequenced, and the species were successfully identified. A total of 20 ng of plasmid was used as a control for the reactions for the N. americanus and Ancylostoma spp.

Species differentiation of Ancylostoma spp

The molecular technique adopted in this study allowed the differentiation between the species N. americanus and the genus Ancylostoma, but for the differentiation between possible Ancylostoma spp. species, sequencing reactions were performed using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, USA) with a ABI 3130 × 1/Genetic Analyzer automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems, USA). These samples were not cloned, but were sequenced in both, forward and reverse directions, and chromatogram analysis was performed using FinchTV software (Geospiza, USA).

Determination of possible contaminants

The fecal sample that contained A. caninum eggs underwent a process of DNA extraction to determine the presence of possible contamination with feces from these animals. For this, DNA extraction was performed from 220 mg of stool with the QIAamp® DNA Stool kit (Qiagen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The DNA was quantified, and a total of 40 ng was used in three PCRs with different primer pairs. The Camt1F + Camt1R (167 bp), Dmt1F + Dmt1R (193 bp) and Hmt2F + Hmt2R (162 bp) primer combinations were designed to anneal only to DNA from the Felis catus, Canis familiaris and Homo sapiens species, respectively. These primers were used to amplify a region of the Cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI). Table 2 shows the sequences of each primer used and the respective reference. PCRs were performed under the same conditions as previously described above, and the sequencing of the amplified material was performed. Previously extracted DNA from F. catus, C. familiaris and H. sapiens were used as reaction controls. Fig. S1.
  54 in total

1.  [Epidemiological observations on Ancylostoma duodenale, Necator americanus and Trichostrongylus orientalis infestations in Niigata Prefecture, Japan].

Authors:  K KOIDE
Journal:  Niigata Igakkai Zasshi       Date:  1961-10

Review 2.  Hookworm infection.

Authors:  Alex Loukas; Peter J Hotez; David Diemert; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; James S McCarthy; Rodrigo Correa-Oliveira; John Croese; Jeffrey M Bethony
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 52.329

3.  New Insights Into the Kinetics and Variability of Egg Excretion in Controlled Human Hookworm Infections.

Authors:  Marie-Astrid Hoogerwerf; Luc E Coffeng; Eric A T Brienen; Jacqueline J Janse; Marijke C C Langenberg; Yvonne C M Kruize; Chelsea Gootjes; Mikhael D Manurung; Mark Dekker; Luke Becker; Marianne A A Erkens; Martha T van der Beek; Munisha S Ganesh; Carola Feijt; Beatrice M F Winkel; Inge M Westra; Pauline Meij; Alex Loukas; Leo G Visser; Sake J de Vlas; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Lisette van Lieshout; Meta Roestenberg
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  Human enteric infection with Ancylostoma caninum: hookworms reappraised in the light of a "new" zoonosis.

Authors:  P Prociv; J Croese
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  Human enteric infection with canine hookworms.

Authors:  J Croese; A Loukas; J Opdebeeck; S Fairley; P Prociv
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1994-03-01       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 6.  [Helminths of carnivores relevant to veterinary practice].

Authors:  M A Hasslinger
Journal:  Tierarztl Prax       Date:  1986

7.  Experimental human infection with the dog hookworm, Ancylostoma caninum.

Authors:  Juergen K Landmann; Paul Prociv
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2003-01-20       Impact factor: 7.738

8.  Molecular Identification of Hookworm Isolates in Humans, Dogs and Soil in a Tribal Area in Tamil Nadu, India.

Authors:  Santosh George; Bruno Levecke; Deepthi Kattula; Vasanthakumar Velusamy; Sheela Roy; Peter Geldhof; Rajiv Sarkar; Gagandeep Kang
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-08-03

9.  Cognitive and Microbiome Impacts of Experimental Ancylostoma ceylanicum Hookworm Infections in Hamsters.

Authors:  Samuel C Pan; Doyle V Ward; Yunqiang Yin; Yan Hu; Mostafa A Elfawal; Robert E Clark; Raffi V Aroian
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.

Authors:  Christopher J L Murray; Theo Vos; Rafael Lozano; Mohsen Naghavi; Abraham D Flaxman; Catherine Michaud; Majid Ezzati; Kenji Shibuya; Joshua A Salomon; Safa Abdalla; Victor Aboyans; Jerry Abraham; Ilana Ackerman; Rakesh Aggarwal; Stephanie Y Ahn; Mohammed K Ali; Miriam Alvarado; H Ross Anderson; Laurie M Anderson; Kathryn G Andrews; Charles Atkinson; Larry M Baddour; Adil N Bahalim; Suzanne Barker-Collo; Lope H Barrero; David H Bartels; Maria-Gloria Basáñez; Amanda Baxter; Michelle L Bell; Emelia J Benjamin; Derrick Bennett; Eduardo Bernabé; Kavi Bhalla; Bishal Bhandari; Boris Bikbov; Aref Bin Abdulhak; Gretchen Birbeck; James A Black; Hannah Blencowe; Jed D Blore; Fiona Blyth; Ian Bolliger; Audrey Bonaventure; Soufiane Boufous; Rupert Bourne; Michel Boussinesq; Tasanee Braithwaite; Carol Brayne; Lisa Bridgett; Simon Brooker; Peter Brooks; Traolach S Brugha; Claire Bryan-Hancock; Chiara Bucello; Rachelle Buchbinder; Geoffrey Buckle; Christine M Budke; Michael Burch; Peter Burney; Roy Burstein; Bianca Calabria; Benjamin Campbell; Charles E Canter; Hélène Carabin; Jonathan Carapetis; Loreto Carmona; Claudia Cella; Fiona Charlson; Honglei Chen; Andrew Tai-Ann Cheng; David Chou; Sumeet S Chugh; Luc E Coffeng; Steven D Colan; Samantha Colquhoun; K Ellicott Colson; John Condon; Myles D Connor; Leslie T Cooper; Matthew Corriere; Monica Cortinovis; Karen Courville de Vaccaro; William Couser; Benjamin C Cowie; Michael H Criqui; Marita Cross; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Manu Dahiya; Nabila Dahodwala; James Damsere-Derry; Goodarz Danaei; Adrian Davis; Diego De Leo; Louisa Degenhardt; Robert Dellavalle; Allyne Delossantos; Julie Denenberg; Sarah Derrett; Don C Des Jarlais; Samath D Dharmaratne; Mukesh Dherani; Cesar Diaz-Torne; Helen Dolk; E Ray Dorsey; Tim Driscoll; Herbert Duber; Beth Ebel; Karen Edmond; Alexis Elbaz; Suad Eltahir Ali; Holly Erskine; Patricia J Erwin; Patricia Espindola; Stalin E Ewoigbokhan; Farshad Farzadfar; Valery Feigin; David T Felson; Alize Ferrari; Cleusa P Ferri; Eric M Fèvre; Mariel M Finucane; Seth Flaxman; Louise Flood; Kyle Foreman; Mohammad H Forouzanfar; Francis Gerry R Fowkes; Marlene Fransen; Michael K Freeman; Belinda J Gabbe; Sherine E Gabriel; Emmanuela Gakidou; Hammad A Ganatra; Bianca Garcia; Flavio Gaspari; Richard F Gillum; Gerhard Gmel; Diego Gonzalez-Medina; Richard Gosselin; Rebecca Grainger; Bridget Grant; Justina Groeger; Francis Guillemin; David Gunnell; Ramyani Gupta; Juanita Haagsma; Holly Hagan; Yara A Halasa; Wayne Hall; Diana Haring; Josep Maria Haro; James E Harrison; Rasmus Havmoeller; Roderick J Hay; Hideki Higashi; Catherine Hill; Bruno Hoen; Howard Hoffman; Peter J Hotez; Damian Hoy; John J Huang; Sydney E Ibeanusi; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Spencer L James; Deborah Jarvis; Rashmi Jasrasaria; Sudha Jayaraman; Nicole Johns; Jost B Jonas; Ganesan Karthikeyan; Nicholas Kassebaum; Norito Kawakami; Andre Keren; Jon-Paul Khoo; Charles H King; Lisa Marie Knowlton; Olive Kobusingye; Adofo Koranteng; Rita Krishnamurthi; Francine Laden; Ratilal Lalloo; Laura L Laslett; Tim Lathlean; Janet L Leasher; Yong Yi Lee; James Leigh; Daphna Levinson; Stephen S Lim; Elizabeth Limb; John Kent Lin; Michael Lipnick; Steven E Lipshultz; Wei Liu; Maria Loane; Summer Lockett Ohno; Ronan Lyons; Jacqueline Mabweijano; Michael F MacIntyre; Reza Malekzadeh; Leslie Mallinger; Sivabalan Manivannan; Wagner Marcenes; Lyn March; David J Margolis; Guy B Marks; Robin Marks; Akira Matsumori; Richard Matzopoulos; Bongani M Mayosi; John H McAnulty; Mary M McDermott; Neil McGill; John McGrath; Maria Elena Medina-Mora; Michele Meltzer; George A Mensah; Tony R Merriman; Ana-Claire Meyer; Valeria Miglioli; Matthew Miller; Ted R Miller; Philip B Mitchell; Charles Mock; Ana Olga Mocumbi; Terrie E Moffitt; Ali A Mokdad; Lorenzo Monasta; Marcella Montico; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Andrew Moran; Lidia Morawska; Rintaro Mori; Michele E Murdoch; Michael K Mwaniki; Kovin Naidoo; M Nathan Nair; Luigi Naldi; K M Venkat Narayan; Paul K Nelson; Robert G Nelson; Michael C Nevitt; Charles R Newton; Sandra Nolte; Paul Norman; Rosana Norman; Martin O'Donnell; Simon O'Hanlon; Casey Olives; Saad B Omer; Katrina Ortblad; Richard Osborne; Doruk Ozgediz; Andrew Page; Bishnu Pahari; Jeyaraj Durai Pandian; Andrea Panozo Rivero; Scott B Patten; Neil Pearce; Rogelio Perez Padilla; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Norberto Perico; Konrad Pesudovs; David Phillips; Michael R Phillips; Kelsey Pierce; Sébastien Pion; Guilherme V Polanczyk; Suzanne Polinder; C Arden Pope; Svetlana Popova; Esteban Porrini; Farshad Pourmalek; Martin Prince; Rachel L Pullan; Kapa D Ramaiah; Dharani Ranganathan; Homie Razavi; Mathilda Regan; Jürgen T Rehm; David B Rein; Guiseppe Remuzzi; Kathryn Richardson; Frederick P Rivara; Thomas Roberts; Carolyn Robinson; Felipe Rodriguez De Leòn; Luca Ronfani; Robin Room; Lisa C Rosenfeld; Lesley Rushton; Ralph L Sacco; Sukanta Saha; Uchechukwu Sampson; Lidia Sanchez-Riera; Ella Sanman; David C Schwebel; James Graham Scott; Maria Segui-Gomez; Saeid Shahraz; Donald S Shepard; Hwashin Shin; Rupak Shivakoti; David Singh; Gitanjali M Singh; Jasvinder A Singh; Jessica Singleton; David A Sleet; Karen Sliwa; Emma Smith; Jennifer L Smith; Nicolas J C Stapelberg; Andrew Steer; Timothy Steiner; Wilma A Stolk; Lars Jacob Stovner; Christopher Sudfeld; Sana Syed; Giorgio Tamburlini; Mohammad Tavakkoli; Hugh R Taylor; Jennifer A Taylor; William J Taylor; Bernadette Thomas; W Murray Thomson; George D Thurston; Imad M Tleyjeh; Marcello Tonelli; Jeffrey A Towbin; Thomas Truelsen; Miltiadis K Tsilimbaris; Clotilde Ubeda; Eduardo A Undurraga; Marieke J van der Werf; Jim van Os; Monica S Vavilala; N Venketasubramanian; Mengru Wang; Wenzhi Wang; Kerrianne Watt; David J Weatherall; Martin A Weinstock; Robert Weintraub; Marc G Weisskopf; Myrna M Weissman; Richard A White; Harvey Whiteford; Natasha Wiebe; Steven T Wiersma; James D Wilkinson; Hywel C Williams; Sean R M Williams; Emma Witt; Frederick Wolfe; Anthony D Woolf; Sarah Wulf; Pon-Hsiu Yeh; Anita K M Zaidi; Zhi-Jie Zheng; David Zonies; Alan D Lopez; Mohammad A AlMazroa; Ziad A Memish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  Efficacy evaluation of anthelmintic products against an infection with the canine hookworm (Ancylostoma caninum) isolate Worthy 4.1F3P in dogs.

Authors:  Pablo D Jimenez Castro; Abdelmoneim Mansour; Samuel Charles; Joe Hostetler; Terry Settje; Daniel Kulke; Ray M Kaplan
Journal:  Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Further evaluation and validation of the VETSCAN IMAGYST: in-clinic feline and canine fecal parasite detection system integrated with a deep learning algorithm.

Authors:  Yoko Nagamori; Ruth Hall Sedlak; Andrew DeRosa; Aleah Pullins; Travis Cree; Michael Loenser; Benjamin S Larson; Richard Boyd Smith; Cory Penn; Richard Goldstein
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Inactivating Effects of Common Laboratory Disinfectants, Fixatives, and Temperatures on the Eggs of Soil Transmitted Helminths.

Authors:  Kristine J Kines; Mark Fox; MacKevin Ndubuisi; Guilherme G Verocai; Vitaliano Cama; Richard S Bradbury
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2021-12-15

4.  Ancylostoma ceylanicum Hookworms in Dogs, Grenada, West Indies.

Authors:  Patsy A Zendejas-Heredia; Vito Colella; Maxine L A Macpherson; Wayne Sylvester; Robin B Gasser; Calum N L Macpherson; Rebecca J Traub
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 16.126

5.  Occurrence of Ancylostoma Caninum from a Gray Fox Urocyon Cinereoargenteus in Southeastern Mexico.

Authors:  J A Panti-May; D I Hernández-Mena; H A Ruiz-Piña; V M Vidal-Martínez
Journal:  Helminthologia       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 1.176

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.