Literature DB >> 32079672

Differential response to pallidal deep brain stimulation among monogenic dystonias: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Carlo Alberto Artusi1, Alok Dwivedi2, Alberto Romagnolo3, Sara Bortolani3, Luca Marsili4, Gabriele Imbalzano3, Andrea Sturchio4, Elizabeth G Keeling4, Maurizio Zibetti3, Maria Fiorella Contarino5,6, Alfonso Fasano7,8, Michele Tagliati9, M S Okun10, Alberto J Espay4, Leonardo Lopiano3, Aristide Merola11.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Genetic subtypes of dystonia may respond differentially to deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus pars interna (GPi DBS). We sought to compare GPi DBS outcomes among the most common monogenic dystonias.
METHODS: This systematic review and meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. We searched PubMed for studies on genetically confirmed monogenic dystonia treated with GPi DBS documenting pre-surgical and post-surgical assessments using the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale Motor Score (BFMMS) and Burke-Fahn-Marsden Disability Score (BFMDS). We performed (i) meta-analysis for each gene mutation; (ii) weighted ordinary linear regression analyses to compare BFMMS and BFMDS outcomes between DYT-TOR1A and other monogenic dystonias, adjusting for age and disease duration and (iii) weighted linear regression analysis to estimate the effect of age, sex and disease duration on GPi DBS outcomes. Results were summarised with mean change and 95% CI.
RESULTS: DYT-TOR1A (68%, 38.4 points; p<0.001), DYT-THAP1 (37% 14.5 points; p<0.001) and NBIA/DYT-PANK2 (27%, 21.4 points; p<0.001) improved in BFMMS; only DYT-TOR1A improved in BFMDS (69%, 9.7 points; p<0.001). Improvement in DYT-TOR1A was significantly greater than in DYT-THAP1 (BFMMS -31%), NBIA/DYT-PANK2 (BFMMS -35%; BFMDS -53%) and CHOR/DYT-ADCY5 (BFMMS -36%; BFMDS -42%). Worse motor outcomes were associated with longer dystonia duration and older age at dystonia onset in DYT-TOR1A, longer dystonia duration in DYT/PARK-TAF1 and younger age at dystonia onset in DYT-SGCE.
CONCLUSIONS: GPi DBS outcomes vary across monogenic dystonias. These data serve to inform patient selection and prognostic counselling. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  deep brain stimulation; dystonia; genetics; globus pallidus; monogenic

Year:  2020        PMID: 32079672     DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2019-322169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry        ISSN: 0022-3050            Impact factor:   10.154


  14 in total

Review 1.  Arching deep brain stimulation in dystonia types.

Authors:  Han-Joon Kim; Beomseok Jeon
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 2.  Neuroimaging Advances in Deep Brain Stimulation: Review of Indications, Anatomy, and Brain Connectomics.

Authors:  E H Middlebrooks; R A Domingo; T Vivas-Buitrago; L Okromelidze; T Tsuboi; J K Wong; R S Eisinger; L Almeida; M R Burns; A Horn; R J Uitti; R E Wharen; V M Holanda; S S Grewal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  GPi-DBS for KMT2B-Associated Dystonia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Roopa Rajan; Kanwaljeet Garg; Arti Saini; Divya M Radhakrishnan; Miryam Carecchio; Binukumar Bk; Manmohan Singh; Achal K Srivastava
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-12-04

4.  Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations in adult dystonia: a joint document by the Italian Society of Neurology, the Italian Academy for the Study of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, and the Italian Network on Botulinum Toxin.

Authors:  Marcello Romano; Sergio Bagnato; Maria Concetta Altavista; Laura Avanzino; Daniele Belvisi; Matteo Bologna; Francesco Bono; Miryam Carecchio; Anna Castagna; Roberto Ceravolo; Antonella Conte; Giuseppe Cosentino; Roberto Eleopra; Tommaso Ercoli; Marcello Esposito; Giovanni Fabbrini; Gina Ferrazzano; Stefania Lalli; Marcello Maria Mascia; Maurizio Osio; Roberta Pellicciari; Simona Petrucci; Enza Maria Valente; Francesca Valentino; Mario Zappia; Maurizio Zibetti; Paolo Girlanda; Michele Tinazzi; Giovanni Defazio; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 3.830

Review 5.  Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation for Monogenic Dystonia: The Effect of Gene on Outcome.

Authors:  Stephen Tisch; Kishore Raj Kumar
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.003

6.  Reappearance of Symptoms after GPi-DBS Discontinuation in Cervical Dystonia.

Authors:  Emma A Honkanen; Jaana Korpela; Eero Pekkonen; Valtteri Kaasinen; Martin M Reich; Juho Joutsa
Journal:  Mov Disord Clin Pract       Date:  2021-02-26

Review 7.  Complex dystonias: an update on diagnosis and care.

Authors:  Rebecca Herzog; Anne Weissbach; Tobias Bäumer; Alexander Münchau
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 3.575

Review 8.  Towards Precision Therapies for Inherited Disorders of Neurodegeneration with Brain Iron Accumulation.

Authors:  Robert V V Spaull; Audrey K S Soo; Penelope Hogarth; Susan J Hayflick; Manju A Kurian
Journal:  Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y)       Date:  2021-11-24

Review 9.  Dystonia Management: What to Expect From the Future? The Perspectives of Patients and Clinicians Within DystoniaNet Europe.

Authors:  Marenka Smit; Alberto Albanese; Monika Benson; Mark J Edwards; Holm Graessner; Michael Hutchinson; Robert Jech; Joachim K Krauss; Francesca Morgante; Belen Pérez Dueñas; Richard B Reilly; Michele Tinazzi; Maria Fiorella Contarino; Marina A J Tijssen
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 4.003

10.  The Efficacy and Predictors of Using GPi-DBS to Treat Early-Onset Dystonia: An Individual Patient Analysis.

Authors:  Wenxiu Chen; Houyou Fan; Guohui Lu
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.