| Literature DB >> 32079142 |
Liang Yang1, Dongsheng Zhang1, Xining Zhang1, Aifen Tian2.
Abstract
In this study, Cu-Ionic polymer metal composites (Cu-IPMC) were fabricated using the electroless plating method. The properties of Cu-IPMC in terms of morphology, water loss rate, adhesive force, surface resistance, displacements, and tip forces were evaluated under direct current voltage. In order to understand the relationship between lengths and actuation properties, we developed two static models of displacements and tip forces. The deposited Cu layer is uniform and smooth and contains about 90% by weight of copper, according to the energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) analysis data obtained. The electrodes adhere well (level of 5B) on the membrane, to ensure a better conductivity and improve the actuation performance. The penetration depth of needle-like electrodes can reach up to around 70 μm, and the structure shows concise without complex branches, to speed up the actuation. Overall the maximum displacement increased as the voltage increased. The applied voltage for the maximum force output is 8-9 V. The root mean square error (RMSE) and determination coefficient (DC) of the displacement and force models are 1.66 and 1.23, 0.96 and 0.86, respectively.Entities:
Keywords: actuator; ionic polymer metal composite; length; properties
Year: 2020 PMID: 32079142 PMCID: PMC7077653 DOI: 10.3390/polym12020460
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.329
Dimensions of the built IPMC specimens.
| No. | Thickness (μm) | Width (mm) | Length (mm) | Clamped Part (mm) | Free Part (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | 187 | 10 | 20 | 10 | 10 |
| L2 | 187 | 10 | 30 | 10 | 20 |
| L3 | 187 | 10 | 40 | 10 | 30 |
| L4 | 187 | 10 | 50 | 10 | 40 |
Figure 1SEM micrographs and EDS spectra of the sample L4.
Figure 2SEM cross-section of the sample (L4).
Figure 3Water loss rate of Cu-IPMC (L4).
Figure 4Adhesive force of the sample L4.
Figure 5Surface resistances of the IPMC (L4).
Figure 6Displacements of the IPMCs with various lengths under different voltages. (a) relationships between the maximum displacement or the response time and voltage for L4 sample; (b) displacement–time curves of 9 V.
Figure 7Tip forces of the IPMCs with various lengths under different voltages [28].
Figure 8Comparison diagram of experimental and calculated values. (a) maximum displacements; (b) maximum tip force.
Comparison of experimental values.and calculated values.
| No. | DR | Voltage/V | Displacement | Tip Force | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental Value/mm | Calculated Value/mm | Error Rate/% | Experimental Value/mN | Calculated Value/mN | Error Rate/% | |||
| 1 | 4 | 6.5 | 21.50 | 23.20 | 7.91 | 3.80 | 4.21 | 10.79 |
| 2 | 4 | 9.5 | 28.50 | 29.90 | 4.91 | 4.80 | 4.34 | 9.58 |
| 3 | 3 | 7.3 | 14.00 | 13.69 | 2.21 | 6.40 | 7.02 | 9.69 |
| 4 | 2 | 7.5 | 12.00 | 11.15 | 7.08 | 8.60 | 9.25 | 7.56 |