| Literature DB >> 31067676 |
Jiale Wang1, Yanjie Wang2,3, Zicai Zhu4, Jiahui Wang5, Qingsong He6, Minzhou Luo7.
Abstract
As an excellent transducer, ionic polymer-metal composites (IPMCs) can act as both an actuator and a sensor. During its sensing process, many factors, such as the water content, the cation type, the surface electrode, and the dimensions of the IPMC sample, have a considerable impact on the IPMC sensing performance. In this paper, the effect of dimensions focused on the Pd-Au typed IPMC samples with various thicknesses, widths, and lengths that were fabricated and their deformation sensing performances were tested and estimated using a self-made electromechanical sensing platform. In our experiments, we employed a two-sensing mode (both current and voltage) to record the signals generated by the IPMC bending. By comparison, it was found that the response trend was closer to the applied deformation curve using the voltage-sensing mode. The following conclusions were obtained. As the thickness increased, IPMC exhibited a better deformation-sensing performance. The thickness of the sample changed from 50 μm to 500 μm and corresponded to a voltage response signal from 0.3 to 1.6 mV. On the contrary, as the length increased, the sensing performance of IPMC decreased when subjected to equal bending. The width displayed a weaker effect on the sensing response. In order to obtain a stronger sensing response, a thickness increase, together with a length reduction, of the IPMC sample is a feasible way. Also, a simplified static model was proposed to successfully explain the sensing properties of IPMC with various sizes.Entities:
Keywords: IPMC; deformation; dimension; sensor
Year: 2019 PMID: 31067676 PMCID: PMC6539605 DOI: 10.3390/s19092104
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Ionic polymer-metal composite (IPMC) sensing under a bending deformation.
Figure 2The detailed fabrication process of IPMC.
Figure 3IPMC samples with dimension difference.
The size parameters of the ionic polymer-metal composite (IPMC).
| No. | Thickness (μm) | Length (mm) | Clamped Part (mm) | Free Part (mm) | Width (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 50 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 5 |
| T2 | 100 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 5 |
| T3 | 200 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 5 |
| T4 | 500 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 5 |
| L1 | 200 | 25 | 10 | 15 | 5 |
| L2 | 200 | 35 | 10 | 25 | 5 |
| L3 | 200 | 45 | 10 | 35 | 5 |
| L4 | 200 | 55 | 10 | 45 | 5 |
| W1 | 200 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 4 |
| W2 | 200 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 6 |
| W3 | 200 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 8 |
| W4 | 200 | 30 | 10 | 20 | 10 |
Figure 4SEM cross-section of the samples (L2).
Figure 5Sensing test platform for the IPMC sample.
Figure 6Comparison of the current amplification and the voltage amplification: (a) amplify the current of the IPMC sensor signal and (b) Amplify the voltage of the IPMC sensor signal.
Figure 7The deformation sensing of the L3 sample with triangular wave signal.
Figure 8Signals of different thicknesses.
Figure 9IPMC in the bending state.
Figure 10Signals of different lengths (Free part).
Figure 11Signals of different widths.
Response signals of the IPMC samples.
| Samples | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | L1 | L2 | L3 | L4 | W1 | W2 | W3 | W4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Response Signals (mV) | 0.33 | 0.71 | 1.05 | 1.62 | 1.3 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.56 | 0.93 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.05 |