Literature DB >> 32078111

Real-time estimation of mean arterial blood pressure based on photoplethysmography dicrotic notch and perfusion index. A pilot study.

Jona Joachim1,2,3, Maxime Coutrot4,5,6, Sandrine Millasseau7, Joaquim Matéo4,6, Alexandre Mebazaa4,5,6, Etienne Gayat4,5,6, Fabrice Vallée4,5,6.   

Abstract

Hypotension during general anesthesia is associated with poor outcome. Continuous monitoring of mean blood pressure (MAP) during anesthesia is useful and needs to be reliable and minimally invasive. Conventional cuff measurements can lead to delays due to its discontinuous nature. It has been shown that there is a relationship between MAP and photoplethysmography (PPG) parameters like the dicrotic notch and perfusion index (PI). The objective of the study was to continuously estimate MAP from PPG. Pulse wave analysis based on PPG was implemented using either notch relative amplitude (MAPNRA), notch absolute amplitude (MAPNAA) or PI (MAPPI) to estimate MAP from PPG waveform features during general anesthesia. Estimated MAP values were compared to brachial cuff MAP (MAPcuff) and to radial invasive MAP (MAPinv). Forty-six patients were analyzed for a total of 235 h. Compared to MAPcuff, mean bias and limits of agreement were 1 mmHg (- 26 to +29), - 1 mmHg (- 10 to +8) and - 3 mmHg (- 21 to +13) for MAPNRA, MAPNAA and MAPPI respectively. Compared to MAPinv, mean absolute error (MAE) was 20 mmHg [10 to 39], 11 mmHg [5 to 18] and 16 mmHg [9 to 24] for MAP derived from MAPNRA, MAPNAA and MAPPI respectively. When calibrated every 5 min, MAPNAA showed a MAE of 6 mmHg [5 to 9]. MAPNAA provides the best estimates with respect to brachial cuff MAP and invasive MAP. Regular calibration allows to reduce drift over time. Beat to beat estimation of MAP during general anesthesia from the PPG appears possible with an acceptable average error.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anesthesia; Mean arterial pressure; Noninvasive blood pressure; Photoplethysmography

Year:  2020        PMID: 32078111     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00486-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  12 in total

1.  Hospital stay and mortality are increased in patients having a "triple low" of low blood pressure, low bispectral index, and low minimum alveolar concentration of volatile anesthesia.

Authors:  Daniel I Sessler; Jeffrey C Sigl; Scott D Kelley; Nassib G Chamoun; Paul J Manberg; Leif Saager; Andrea Kurz; Scott Greenwald
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Anesthetic management and one-year mortality after noncardiac surgery.

Authors:  Terri G Monk; Vikas Saini; B Craig Weldon; Jeffrey C Sigl
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures.

Authors:  P S Myles; J Cui
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Relationship between intraoperative mean arterial pressure and clinical outcomes after noncardiac surgery: toward an empirical definition of hypotension.

Authors:  Michael Walsh; Philip J Devereaux; Amit X Garg; Andrea Kurz; Alparslan Turan; Reitze N Rodseth; Jacek Cywinski; Lehana Thabane; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Insight into the dicrotic notch in photoplethysmographic pulses from the finger tip of young adults.

Authors:  P Shi; S Hu; Y Zhu; J Zheng; Y Qiu; P Y S Cheang
Journal:  J Med Eng Technol       Date:  2009

6.  The dicrotic notch analyzed by a numerical model.

Authors:  María Teresa Politi; Arthur Ghigo; Juan Manuel Fernández; Ismaïl Khelifa; Julien Gaudric; José María Fullana; Pierre-Yves Lagrée
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 4.589

Review 7.  Methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist.

Authors:  L J Montenij; W F Buhre; J R Jansen; C L Kruitwagen; E E de Waal
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Brachial and Radial Systolic Blood Pressure Are Not the Same.

Authors:  Matthew K Armstrong; Martin G Schultz; Dean S Picone; J Andrew Black; Nathan Dwyer; Philip Roberts-Thomson; James E Sharman
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Noninvasive continuous detection of arterial hypotension during induction of anaesthesia using a photoplethysmographic signal: proof of concept.

Authors:  Maxime Coutrot; Jona Joachim; François Dépret; Sandrine Millasseau; Hélène Nougué; Joaquim Matéo; Alexandre Mebazaa; Etienne Gayat; Fabrice Vallée
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  Comparison of the non-invasive Nexfin® monitor with conventional methods for the measurement of arterial blood pressure in moderate risk orthopaedic surgery patients.

Authors:  Felix Balzer; Marit Habicher; Michael Sander; Julian Sterr; Stephanie Scholz; Aarne Feldheiser; Michael Müller; Carsten Perka; Sascha Treskatsch
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.671

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  What is new in hemodynamic monitoring and management?

Authors:  Moritz Flick; Alina Bergholz; Pawel Sierzputowski; Simon T Vistisen; Bernd Saugel
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.977

Review 2.  Assessing hemodynamics from the photoplethysmogram to gain insights into vascular age: a review from VascAgeNet.

Authors:  Peter H Charlton; Birutė Paliakaitė; Kristjan Pilt; Martin Bachler; Serena Zanelli; Dániel Kulin; John Allen; Magid Hallab; Elisabetta Bianchini; Christopher C Mayer; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Verena Dittrich; Bernhard Hametner; Dave Veerasingam; Dejan Žikić; Vaidotas Marozas
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.733

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.