Atherosclerosis is one of the leading causes of mortality in developed and developing countries. The onset of atherosclerosis development is accompanied by overexpression of several inflammatory chemokines. Neutralization of these chemokines by chemokine-binding agents attenuates atherosclerosis progression. Here, we studied structural binding features of the tick protein Evasin-3 to chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1). We showed that Evasin-3-bound CXCL1 is unable to activate the CXCR2 receptor, but retains affinity to glycosaminoglycans. This observation was exploited to detect inflammation by visualizing a group of closely related CXC-type chemokines deposited on cell walls in human endothelial cells and murine carotid arteries by a fluorescent Evasin-3 conjugate. This work highlights the applicability of tick-derived chemokine-binding conjugates as a platform for the development of new agents for inflammation imaging.
Atherosclerosis is one of the leading causes of mortality in developed and developing countries. The onset of atherosclerosis development is accompanied by overexpression of several inflammatory chemokines. Neutralization of these chemokines by chemokine-binding agents attenuates atherosclerosis progression. Here, we studied structural binding features of the tick protein Evasin-3 to chemokine (C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1). We showed that Evasin-3-bound CXCL1 is unable to activate the CXCR2 receptor, but retains affinity to glycosaminoglycans. This observation was exploited to detect inflammation by visualizing a group of closely related CXC-type chemokines deposited on cell walls in human endothelial cells and murine carotid arteries by a fluorescent Evasin-3 conjugate. This work highlights the applicability of tick-derived chemokine-binding conjugates as a platform for the development of new agents for inflammation imaging.
Atherosclerosis is
a chronic inflammatory disease characterized
by accumulation of lipid-rich plaques in the wall of large or medium-sized
arteries and is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality
in developed countries.[1] Development of
atherosclerotic lesions begins with adhesion of monocytes to endothelial
cells (EC) caused by an elevated level of plasma cholesterol.[2] The underlying processes of monocyte adhesion
are mediated by chemokines—small structurally conservative
proteins[3]—which are presented on
activated endothelium at the luminal surface of atherosclerotic arteries
and regulate cell trafficking and recruitment.[4−6] The chemokine
(C-X-C motif) ligand 1 (CXCL1, melanomagrowth stimulatory
activity (MGSA), GRO-α) is a major player in atherosclerosis
development at early stages.[7] Therefore,
neutralization of CXCL1 by chemokine-binding agents could be beneficial
for reduction of atherosclerosis progression, as it has been proven
for CCL17 and CCL5/CXCL4 heterodimer.[8,9]Intervention
in the chemokine signaling system and neutralization
of chemokines are widely exploited by pathogenic organisms and parasites
such as ticks to evade an immune response of their hosts.[10] Evasins are a group of small cysteine-rich chemokine-binding
proteins produced in salivary glands of ticks.[11,12] Evasin-3 is of particular interest as it binds to several CXC-type
chemokines including CXCL1[13] and has been
shown to reduce neutrophilic inflammation in mouse models of carotid
atherosclerosis and ischemic stroke.[14]Here, anti-CXCL1 activity of Evasin-3 was investigated using chemotaxis
assays and solution NMR spectroscopy. Based on obtained structural
data, we showed that Evasin-3 does not block interactions of CXCL1
with glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and thus could be used as an inflammation
imaging agent. As a result, an Oregon Green 488Evasin-3 conjugate
was synthesized by solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS) and characterized
by surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensor analysis. Subsequently,
this conjugate was successfully applied for visualization of a group
of closely related CXC-type chemokines in human microvascular endothelial
cells and in activated endothelium of mounted whole mouse carotid
arteries.
Results and Discussion
Monocyte arrest at early stages
of atherosclerosis development
is promoted through activation of CXCR2 receptor by CXCL1 deposited
on heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the endothelial cell surface.[15,16] To investigate whether Evasin-3 could inhibit CXCL1-mediated monocyte
adhesion, flow chamber adhesion assays with human umbilical vein endothelial
cells (HUVECs) were performed. Endothelial cells were activated by
lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) treatment, since it has been shown to
trigger CXCL1 deposition on the cell surface.[5] Adhesion of monocyte to EC was significantly diminished in the presence
of 10 nM Evasin-3, when compared with LPA-induced EC (Figure A). In addition to monocytes,
neutrophils have a proatherogenic function in the initiation of atherosclerotic
lesion formation.[17,18] Furthermore, symptomatic atherosclerotic
plaques have a higher number of intraplaque neutrophils when compared
with asymptomatic lesions, pointing to a pathogenic role of these
leukocyte subtypes.[19] Evasin-3 dramatically
reduced adhesion of neutrophils in the flow chamber assay compared
with control LPA-activated endothelial cells (Figure B). The observed effect is in agreement with
previously published data, showing that Evasin-3 inhibits neutrophil
recruitment[20] and decreases neutrophil
counts in carotid arteries.[14] However,
LPA activation of ECs leads to increasing expression of not only CXCL1
but also CXCL8, CXCL6, CXCL3, and CXCL2 (Figure S1). Thus, observed monocyte and neutrophil adhesion inhibition
is most likely the result of neutralization of multiple CXC-type chemokines
by Evasin-3. To rule out the influence of other expressed CXC-type
chemokines, a neutrophil chemotaxis assay was performed, in which
CXCL1 deliberately was added as a chemoattractant. CXCL1-induced migration
of neutrophils in these experiments was effectively inhibited by coincubation
with 10 nM of Evasin-3 (Figure C,D).
Figure 1
Evasin-3 inhibits migration and adhesion of monocytes
and neutrophils.
Influence of Evasin-3 on adhesion of monocytes (A) and neutrophils
(B) to LPA activated HUVECs (n = 3–6). Data
are represented as mean ± SD. C. Light microscopy images of 5
μm polycarbonate membrane after CXCL1-induced PMN migration
in the absence (top) or presence (bottom) of Evasin-3. The poly lobular
nuclei of PMNs are in purple; black dots represent the pores of the
membrane. Scale bar is 50 μm. D. CXCL1-induced migration of
monocytes in absence (n = 5) and presence of Evasin-3
(n = 5) compared with the control in the absence
of chemoattractant (n = 8).
Evasin-3 inhibits migration and adhesion of monocytes
and neutrophils.
Influence of Evasin-3 on adhesion of monocytes (A) and neutrophils
(B) to LPA activated HUVECs (n = 3–6). Data
are represented as mean ± SD. C. Light microscopy images of 5
μm polycarbonate membrane after CXCL1-induced PMN migration
in the absence (top) or presence (bottom) of Evasin-3. The poly lobular
nuclei of PMNs are in purple; black dots represent the pores of the
membrane. Scale bar is 50 μm. D. CXCL1-induced migration of
monocytes in absence (n = 5) and presence of Evasin-3
(n = 5) compared with the control in the absence
of chemoattractant (n = 8).To shed light on the molecular basis of the anti-CXCL1 activity
of Evasin-3, the formation of a CXCL1/Evasin-3 complex has been studied
by NMR spectroscopy. In order to allow NMR experiments, CXCL1 and
met-Evasin-3 (Evasin-3 variant with an N-terminal methionine) were
obtained in uniformly 15N- and 13C-labeled forms.
Then, sequential assignment was carried out for both unbound proteins
and the CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex using a combination of 2D and 3D
NMR spectra. Detailed analysis of NMR spectra of free [15N, 13C] met-Evasin-3 was published recently.[21] Addition of CXCL1 rapidly caused large changes
in the 15N–1H HSQC spectrum with the
most perturbed residues located in the F17–S21 and F38–G55
regions (Figure A
and S2). In contrast, chemical shifts of
the N- (L1–N16) and C-terminal (N56–R66) residues of
met-Evasin-3 stayed unperturbed upon CXCL1 binding. To assess the
influence of CXCL1 binding on N- and C-terminal regions, 15N NOE relaxation values were measured to determine the local flexibility
of the peptide chain (Figure B). Negative values for L1–D12 and V63–R66 regions
indicate that N- and C-terminal regions stay flexible in both the
free [15N, 13C] met-Evasin-3 and the CXCL1/[15N, 13C] met-Evasin-3 complex. These observations
are in line with the previous reports observing that the Evasin-3
core region plays a crucial role in the chemokine binding, whereas
the N- and C-termini do not participate in binding and remain flexible.[13,21]
Figure 2
A.
Chemical perturbation plot of 350 μM [15N, 13C] met-Evasin-3 upon binding of CXCL1 at 37 °C, pH 4.5.
Delta values are expressed as the sum of weighted square roots of 1H and 15N chemical shifts perturbations; the dashed
line indicates an average value of chemical shift perturbation. B. 15N heteronuclear NOE relaxation values of 350 μM [15N, 13C] met-Evasin-3 in free form (light blue)
and in the CXCL1/[15N,13C] met-Evasin-3 complex
(dark blue).
A.
Chemical perturbation plot of 350 μM [15N, 13C] met-Evasin-3 upon binding of CXCL1 at 37 °C, pH 4.5.
Delta values are expressed as the sum of weighted square roots of 1H and 15N chemical shifts perturbations; the dashed
line indicates an average value of chemical shift perturbation. B. 15N heteronuclear NOE relaxation values of 350 μM [15N, 13C] met-Evasin-3 in free form (light blue)
and in the CXCL1/[15N,13C] met-Evasin-3 complex
(dark blue).A similar set of NMR spectra were
recorded for [15N, 13C] CXCL1 in the free and
in the met-Evasin3-bound form. These
NMR data indicated the presence of the dimeric and monomeric forms
of CXCL1 in a ∼1:1 ratio at a protein concentration of 50 μM
(Figure A). The chemical
shift perturbation (CSP) pattern of the monomer/dimer equilibria (Figure, C, top) shows that
most affected CXCL1 residues are located in the β1-strand (S25–S30)
and α-helix (K60, I62–N68), which comprise the intermolecular
dimerization interface in the CXCL1 homodimer. Although perturbed
residues in the N-loop (Q16–I18) and β2-strand (T38–T43)
do not directly participate in the formation of the dimer interface;
perturbation in this region could be explained by the indirect effect
due to loss of steric interactions between the N-loop and the α-helix
and disruption of the β1−β1 β-sheet upon
CXCL1 dimer disruption, respectively. Addition of a slight excess
of met-Evasin-3 to 50 μM [15N,13C] CXCL1
caused immediate changes in CXCL1 chemical shifts and resulted in
the single set of NMR resonance signals indicating formation of 1:1
[15N,13C] CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex (Figure B). met-Evasin-3-induced
CSP for monomeric CXCL1 are strictly located in two regions: β1-strand
(S25–V28) and α-helix region (I58, E64, L67, N68), indicating
the CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex interface (Figure C, bottom). The CSP pattern for Evasin-3
binding to the CXCL1 dimer mirrors the plot of CXCL1 dimerization
with perturbations located in the N-loop (Q16–I18), β1-strand
(V28, K29, S30), β2-strand (T38–T43), and α-helix
(I58, K60, I62, I63, L67) regions. These perturbations follow the
similar pattern observed for the CXCL8 dimer[21] and indicate disruption of the CXCL1 dimer upon binding of met-Evasin-3.
Figure 3
Binding
of Evasin-3 disrupts CXCL1 dimer. 15N–1H HSQC spectrum of 50 μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1
(A) and 15N–1H HSQC spectrum
of 50 μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1/met-Evasin-3
complex (B) at 37 °C, pH 4.5. Amide peaks of the monomeric form
are labeled in blue; the dimeric form is in black; overlapping peaks
are in red. Assignments of Asn, Gln, and Arg side chain peaks are
hidden for clarity. C. Chemical shift perturbation plots for CXCL1
monomer/dimer equilibria (top), and upon met-Evasin-3 binding to CXCL1
(bottom). Delta values are expressed as the sum of weighted square
roots of 1H and 15N chemical shift perturbations.
The secondary structure of CXCL1 is derived from the crystal structure
(PDB ID 1MGS).
Binding
of Evasin-3 disrupts CXCL1 dimer. 15N–1H HSQC spectrum of 50 μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1
(A) and 15N–1H HSQC spectrum
of 50 μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1/met-Evasin-3
complex (B) at 37 °C, pH 4.5. Amide peaks of the monomeric form
are labeled in blue; the dimeric form is in black; overlapping peaks
are in red. Assignments of Asn, Gln, and Arg side chain peaks are
hidden for clarity. C. Chemical shift perturbation plots for CXCL1
monomer/dimer equilibria (top), and upon met-Evasin-3 binding to CXCL1
(bottom). Delta values are expressed as the sum of weighted square
roots of 1H and 15N chemical shift perturbations.
The secondary structure of CXCL1 is derived from the crystal structure
(PDB ID 1MGS).It has been shown that met-Evasin-3
binding effectively disrupts
the interaction of CXCL8 with GAGs by intercalating in between the
α-helix and the N-loop.[21] Although
positively charged residues of the α-helix and the N-loop of
CXCL1 participate in GAG binding similarly as in CXCL8, CXCL1 possesses
more complex GAG binding topology having two non-overlapping α
and β GAG binding domains.[22−24] To assess the structural
relationships between the CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex and GAGs, binding
of a synthetic heparin mimic—Fondaparinux (Arixtra, GSK)—to
CXCL1 in the free and bound-by-met-Evasin-3 form was studied. Addition
of 5-fold excess of Fondaparinux to 250 μM [15N,13C] CXCL1 led to a large chemical shift of both monomeric
and dimeric CXCL1 and resulted in a single set of NMR signals (Figure S3). The CPS plot for the CXCL1 monomer
indicates that Fondaparinux binding causes CXCL1 dimerization as residues
of the β1-, β2-strands and α-helix are to a large
extent perturbed (Figure A). Residues of N-terminus (A4, T5, C11) and N-loop (H19,
K21) are substantially affected upon binding of GAG when compared
to both free mono- and dimeric CXCL1. Large perturbations of H19 and
K21 could indicate that binding of GAG is mediated mostly by the α-domain
of CXCL1 (Figure B),
as residues K45–R49, which constitute the β-domain, are
not affected by addition of Fondaparinux.
Figure 4
Binding of GAGs to CXCL1.
A. Chemical shift perturbation plot of
250 μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1 (top) and 200
μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 (bottom)
upon binding of Fondaparinux (Arixtra, GSK). B. GAG binding surface
of the α-domain of CXCL1 dimer. C. α-Domain and positively
charged residues of CXCL1 perturbed upon Fondaparinux binding depicted
in the schematic representation of CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex. The
representation is based on CXCL8/Evasin-3 complex; Evasin-3 is depicted
in black serpentine; N- and C-termini are hidden for visibility.
Binding of GAGs to CXCL1.
A. Chemical shift perturbation plot of
250 μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1 (top) and 200
μM [15N, 13C] CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 (bottom)
upon binding of Fondaparinux (Arixtra, GSK). B. GAG binding surface
of the α-domain of CXCL1 dimer. C. α-Domain and positively
charged residues of CXCL1 perturbed upon Fondaparinux binding depicted
in the schematic representation of CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex. The
representation is based on CXCL8/Evasin-3 complex; Evasin-3 is depicted
in black serpentine; N- and C-termini are hidden for visibility.GAG-induced CPS pattern for 200 μM of [15N, 13C] CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex largely diverts
from the one
for free di- and monomeric CXCL1 (Figure, A, bottom; Figure S4). Whereas H19 and K21 of the α-domain are affected similarly
as in GAG binding to free CXCL1, unaffected residues of the β-domain
in the free form (K45, R48, and K49) are substantially perturbed in
the case of CXCL1/met-Evasin-3 complex. Changes in GAG binding mode
could be explained by disruption of the CXCL1 dimer and therefore
the GAG binding α-domain upon Evasin-3 binding (Figure C). As the integrity of the
α-domain is lost in the CXCL1/Evasin-3 complex, binding of GAGs
is reoriented toward residues from the α-domain (H19, K21) and
β-domain (K45, R48, and K49), which represents a continuous
positively charged surface (Figure D). The similar GAG binding plasticity was observed
in the case of binding several GAG types to CXCL1.[25] This observation most likely indicates the formation of
a trimeric [15N,13C] CXCL1/met-Evasin-3/Fondaparinux
complex. Thus, Evasin-3 binding to CXCL1 may not be sufficient for
CXCL1 removal from GAGs of the cell wall. This assumption opens an
opportunity to use Evasin-3 as a probe to detect CXCL1 deposited at
the GAGs of the luminal vessel surface and thereby identify inflammation
spots in arteries.To explore this opportunity, we synthesized
a conjugate of Evasin-3
and Oregon Green 488 (OG488). A glycosylation site was preferred for
labeling to minimize the influence of a bulky fluorophore moiety on
Evasin-3 on the affinity to CXCL1 and to retain biological activity.
For that reason, the putative N-glycosylation site N56 has been mutated
to lysine to allow OG488 coupling through the lysine side chain. ThisEvasin-3 conjugate was successfully synthesized using Boc-based SPPS
and native chemical ligation and named N56KEvasin-3OG488 (Figure A,B). SPR biosensor
analysis was used to investigate the affinity of N56KEvasin-3OG488
to explore the influence of thisK56N mutation and fluorophore conjugation
on affinity for CXCL1. SPR experiments were performed with synthetic
uniformly biotinylated CXCL1 (Figure S5) immobilized on a chip surface coated with streptavidin. Results
indicated that Evasin-3 and N56KEvasin-3OG488 bind CXCL1 in a dose-dependent
manner with comparable Kd values of 106
nM and 68 nM, respectively (Figure C; Figure S6).
Figure 5
Synthetic Evasin-3
variant uniformly labeled with OG488 retains
nM affinity to CXCL1. A. Chemical synthesis of N56K Evasin-3 OG488.
B. HPLC track and mass spectrum of purified N56K Evasin-3 OG488. Deconvoluted
and calculated mass of [M + H]+ were 7404.16 and 7403.63
Da, respectively. C. Progress and binding curves of N56K Evasin-3
OG488 to CXCL1 immobilized on a streptavidin-coated chip. The apparent Kd value, quantified from the data employing
Langmuir-like steady-state affinity model with a linear component,
was 68 nM (Rmax = 9.6, χ2 = 0.033).
Synthetic Evasin-3
variant uniformly labeled with OG488 retains
nM affinity to CXCL1. A. Chemical synthesis of N56KEvasin-3OG488.
B. HPLC track and mass spectrum of purified N56KEvasin-3OG488. Deconvoluted
and calculated mass of [M + H]+ were 7404.16 and 7403.63
Da, respectively. C. Progress and binding curves of N56KEvasin-3OG488 to CXCL1 immobilized on a streptavidin-coated chip. The apparent Kd value, quantified from the data employing
Langmuir-like steady-state affinity model with a linear component,
was 68 nM (Rmax = 9.6, χ2 = 0.033).The N56KEvasin-3OG488 variant
was further used for CXCL1 visualization
experiments. Previous studies showed that shear stress increased the
amount of CXCL1 tethered to EC.[26,27] To explore whether
or not N56KEvasin-3OG488 could bind to CXCL1 tethered on activated
ECs, human microvascular endothelial cells (HMVECs) were cultured
under 2.0 Pa of shear stress for 72 h to mimic human arterial shear
stress. Addition of N56KEvasin-3OG488 to the flowing medium clearly
exhibited binding of N56KEvasin-3OG488 to shear stress-activated
cells, whereas HMVECs cultured under static conditions only showed
minimal adherence of N56KEvasin-3OG488 (Figure A,B). Although it has not been proven experimentally,
it is safe to suggest that shear stress triggers expression of several
CXC-type chemokines similar to LPA activation. In contrast to CXCL8,
CXCL2, -3, -5, and -6 embody conservative positively charged lysines
in the region involved in the formation of a CXCL1/Evasin-3/GAG complex
(Figure S7A). At least one chemokine, namely,
CXCL3, shares the exact pattern of GAG-binding residues with CXCL1.
That makes it possible to conclude that N56KEvasin-3OG488 most likely
binds to several CXC-type chemokines deposited on GAGs after shear
stress activation of ECs.
Figure 6
Fluorescently labeled Evasin-3 visualizes CXCL1
in stress-activated
HMVECs and LPA-activated murine carotid arteries. HMVECs cultured
under static conditions (A) and subjected to 2.0 Pa (20 dyn/cm2) shear stress for 72 h (B) (green = N56K Evasin-3 OG488,
blue = Hoechst). Two-photon laser scanning microscopy of mounted murine
carotid arteries without (C) and with LPA treatment for 10 min (D)
(green N56K Evasin-3 OG488, blue autofluorescence collagen).
Fluorescently labeled Evasin-3 visualizes CXCL1
in stress-activated
HMVECs and LPA-activated murine carotid arteries. HMVECs cultured
under static conditions (A) and subjected to 2.0 Pa (20 dyn/cm2) shear stress for 72 h (B) (green = N56KEvasin-3OG488,
blue = Hoechst). Two-photon laser scanning microscopy of mounted murine
carotid arteries without (C) and with LPA treatment for 10 min (D)
(green N56KEvasin-3OG488, blue autofluorescence collagen).To translate these in vitro experiments
into a
more biologically relevant system, LPA-activated endothelium of murine
carotid artery was subsequently used in experiments with N56KEvasin-3OG488. The effect of Evasin-3 on LPA-activated endothelium in whole
mounted carotid arteries was studied by TPLSM, as this enables ex vivo imaging in vessels. Activation of endothelial cells
by perfusion of the carotids with 10 μM LPA resulted in accumulation
of N56KEvasin-3OG488 at the luminal side of the carotid artery,
whereas minimal N56KEvasin-3OG488 adhesion could be observed in
control carotids (Figure C,D). These results indicate that N56KEvasin-3OG488 is able
to bind to CXC-type chemokines presented on activated endothelium
at the luminal vessel surface of affected murine arteries. Comparison
of known murineCXC-type chemokines with humanCXCL1 (Figure S7B) shows that human and murineCXCL1
share a conservative pattern of GAG-binding residues (H19, K21, K45,
R48) with the only exception in the position K49 (E49 in the case
of murineCXCL1). MurineCXCL2, -3, and -5 substantially differ from
humanCXCL1, lacking His and Arg in positions 19 and 48, respectively.
Thus, at least one murine chemokine (CXCL1) binds Evasin-3 and GAGs
similarly to humanCXCL1 and allows for visualization of inflammation
in murine arteries.In summary, we studied binding of Evasin-3
to CXCL1 from the structural
standpoint and showed that Evasin-3 can bind CXCL1 deposited on cell
wall GAGs. Taking into account that Evasin-3 binds several CXC-type
chemokines which share the conservative structure and GAG-binding
motifs, Evasin-3 most likely binds several CXC-type chemokines through
the same proposed mechanism. Although Evasin-3 is not a selective
chemokine binding protein, fluorophore-labeled or even radiolabeled
Evasin-3 might be used as a molecular imaging agent for detection
of inflamed endothelium, and thus atherosclerotic plaques noninvasively.
This hypothesis was proven by imaging of CXC-type chemokines by the
fluorescent Evasin-3 conjugate in activated endothelium of HUVEC and
whole murine carotid artery. Taking into account that Evasin-3 and
its variants could be readily obtained by solid-phase peptide synthesis,
Evasin-3 represents an attractive candidate for further development
of prospective and more selective imaging agents for cardiovascular
diseases.
Authors: Zhe Zhou; Pallavi Subramanian; Gueler Sevilmis; Brigitta Globke; Oliver Soehnlein; Ela Karshovska; Remco Megens; Kathrin Heyll; Jerold Chun; Jean Sébastien Saulnier-Blache; Markus Reinholz; Marc van Zandvoort; Christian Weber; Andreas Schober Journal: Cell Metab Date: 2011-05-04 Impact factor: 27.287
Authors: Alma Zernecke; Ilze Bot; Yassin Djalali-Talab; Erdenechimeg Shagdarsuren; Kiril Bidzhekov; Svenja Meiler; Regina Krohn; Andreas Schober; Markus Sperandio; Oliver Soehnlein; Jörg Bornemann; Frank Tacke; Erik A Biessen; Christian Weber Journal: Circ Res Date: 2007-11-08 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Stepan S Denisov; Johannes H Ippel; Alexandra C A Heinzmann; Rory R Koenen; Almudena Ortega-Gomez; Oliver Soehnlein; Tilman M Hackeng; Ingrid Dijkgraaf Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-06-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Angela W Lee; Maud Deruaz; Christopher Lynch; Graham Davies; Kamayani Singh; Yara Alenazi; James R O Eaton; Akane Kawamura; Jeffrey Shaw; Amanda E I Proudfoot; João M Dias; Shoumo Bhattacharya Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Danique L van den Kerkhof; Magdolna Nagy; Kanin Wichapong; Sanne L N Brouns; Johan W M Heemskerk; Tilman M Hackeng; Ingrid Dijkgraaf Journal: Res Pract Thromb Haemost Date: 2020-12-18
Authors: Jan Korbecki; Magdalena Gąssowska-Dobrowolska; Jerzy Wójcik; Iwona Szatkowska; Katarzyna Barczak; Mikołaj Chlubek; Irena Baranowska-Bosiacka Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-04-11 Impact factor: 6.208