Literature DB >> 32077390

Development of a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived body volume equation in Hispanic adults for administering a four-compartment model.

Brett S Nickerson1, Michael V Fedewa2, Cherilyn N McLester3, John R McLester3, Michael R Esco2.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was: (1) to develop a new dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived body volume (BV) equation with the GE-Lunar prodigy while utilising underwater weighing (UWW) as a criterion and (2) to cross-validate the novel DXA-derived BV equation (4C-DXANickerson), Wilson DXA-derived BV equation (4C-DXAWilson) and air displacement plethysmography (ADP)-derived BV (4C-ADP) in Hispanic adults. A total of 191 Hispanic adults (18-45 years) participated in the present study. The development sample consisted of 120 females and males (50 % females), whereas the cross-validation sample comprised of forty-one females and thirty males (n 71). Criterion body fat percentage (BF %) and fat-free mass (FFM) were determined using a four-compartment (4C) model with UWW as a criterion for BV (4C-UWW). 4C-DXANickerson, 4C-DXAWilson and 4C-ADP were compared against 4C-UWW in the cross-validation sample. 4C-DXANickerson, 4C-DXAWilson and 4C-ADP all produced similar validity statistics when compared with 4C-UWW in Hispanic males (all P > 0·05). 4C-DXANickerson also yielded similar BF % and FFM values as 4C-UWW when evaluating the mean differences (constant error (CE)) in Hispanic females (CE = -0·79 % and 0·38 kg; P = 0·060 and 0·174, respectively). However, 4C-DXAWilson produced significantly different BF % and FFM values (CE = 3·22 % and -2·20 kg, respectively; both P < 0·001). Additionally, 4C-DXAWilson yielded significant proportional bias when estimating BF % (P < 0·001), whereas 4C-ADP produced significant proportional bias for BF % and FFM (both P < 0·05) when evaluated in Hispanic females. The present study findings demonstrate that 4C-DXANickerson is a valid measure of BV in Hispanics and is recommended for use in clinics, where DXA is the main body composition assessment technique.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adiposity; Body composition; Lean mass; Multi-compartment models

Year:  2020        PMID: 32077390     DOI: 10.1017/S0007114520000598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  2 in total

1.  Validity of a 3-compartment body composition model using body volume derived from a novel 2-dimensional image analysis program.

Authors:  Katherine Sullivan; Bjoern Hornikel; Clifton J Holmes; Michael R Esco; Michael V Fedewa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Proportional bias of multifrequency bioimpedance analysis is larger in Hispanic females than males.

Authors:  Brett S Nickerson; Ronald L Snarr
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.876

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.