Literature DB >> 32077278

Predictive Models for Human Organ Toxicity Based on In Vitro Bioactivity Data and Chemical Structure.

Tuan Xu1, Deborah K Ngan1, Lin Ye1, Menghang Xia1, Heidi Q Xie2,3, Bin Zhao2,3, Anton Simeonov1, Ruili Huang1.   

Abstract

Traditional toxicity testing reliant on animal models is costly and low throughput, posing a significant challenge with the increasing numbers of chemicals that humans are exposed to in the environment. The purpose of this investigation was to build optimal prediction models for various human in vivo/organ-level toxicity end points (extracted from ChemIDPlus) using chemical structure and Tox21 in vitro quantitative high-throughput screening (qHTS) bioactivity assay data. Several supervised machine learning algorithms were applied to model 14 human toxicity end points pertaining to vascular, kidney, ureter and bladder, and liver organ systems. Three metrics were used to evaluate model performance: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC), balanced accuracy (BA), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). The top four models, with AUC-ROC values >0.8, were derived for endocrine (0.90 ± 0.00), musculoskeletal (0.88 ± 0.02), peripheral nerve and sensation (0.85 ± 0.01), and brain and coverings (0.83 ± 0.02) toxicities, whereas the best model AUC-ROC values were >0.7 for the remaining 10 toxicities. Model performance was found to be dependent on the specific data set, model type, and feature selection method used. In addition, chemical structure and assay data showed different levels of contribution to the prediction of different toxicity end points. Although in vitro assay data, when combined with chemical structure, slightly improved the predictive accuracy for most end points (11 out of 14), a noteworthy finding was the near equal success of the structure-only models, which do not require Tox21 qHTS screening data, and the relatively poor performance of assay-only models. Thus, the top-performing structure-only models from this study could be applied for hazard screening of large sets of chemicals for potential human toxicity, whereas the largest assay contributions to models (i.e., cellular targets) could be used, along with the top-contributing structural features, to provide insight into toxicity mechanisms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32077278     DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  5 in total

1.  Machine Learning Models for Predicting Liver Toxicity.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Wenjing Guo; Sugunadevi Sakkiah; Zuowei Ji; Gokhan Yavas; Wen Zou; Minjun Chen; Weida Tong; Tucker A Patterson; Huixiao Hong
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  In silico approaches in organ toxicity hazard assessment: current status and future needs in predicting liver toxicity.

Authors:  Arianna Bassan; Vinicius M Alves; Alexander Amberg; Lennart T Anger; Scott Auerbach; Lisa Beilke; Andreas Bender; Mark T D Cronin; Kevin P Cross; Jui-Hua Hsieh; Nigel Greene; Raymond Kemper; Marlene T Kim; Moiz Mumtaz; Tobias Noeske; Manuela Pavan; Julia Pletz; Daniel P Russo; Yogesh Sabnis; Markus Schaefer; David T Szabo; Jean-Pierre Valentin; Joerg Wichard; Dominic Williams; David Woolley; Craig Zwickl; Glenn J Myatt
Journal:  Comput Toxicol       Date:  2021-09-09

3.  Prediction of drug-induced liver injury and cardiotoxicity using chemical structure and in vitro assay data.

Authors:  Lin Ye; Deborah K Ngan; Tuan Xu; Zhichao Liu; Jinghua Zhao; Srilatha Sakamuru; Li Zhang; Tongan Zhao; Menghang Xia; Anton Simeonov; Ruili Huang
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 4.460

4.  Systematic Identification of Molecular Targets and Pathways Related to Human Organ Level Toxicity.

Authors:  Tuan Xu; Leihong Wu; Menghang Xia; Anton Simeonov; Ruili Huang
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-29       Impact factor: 3.973

5.  ChemBioSim: Enhancing Conformal Prediction of In Vivo Toxicity by Use of Predicted Bioactivities.

Authors:  Marina Garcia de Lomana; Andrea Morger; Ulf Norinder; Roland Buesen; Robert Landsiedel; Andrea Volkamer; Johannes Kirchmair; Miriam Mathea
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 4.956

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.