| Literature DB >> 32077263 |
Xiao-Feng Zhao1, Yi-Bo Zhao1, Xiang-Dong Lu1, Wen-Xuan Wang1, De-Tai Qi1, Xu Yang1, Xiao-Nan Wang1, Run-Tian Zhou1, Yuan-Zhang Jin1, Bin Zhao1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a new type of open dynamic cervical spine system and study its biomechanical properties.Entities:
Keywords: Anterior cervical spine plate; Biomechanics; New type
Year: 2020 PMID: 32077263 PMCID: PMC7031558 DOI: 10.1111/os.12622
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Surg ISSN: 1757-7853 Impact factor: 2.071
Figure 1Various models of open‐power cervical anterior titanium plate.
Figure 2The advantage of open‐power cervical anterior titanium plate: ① Slope edge and smooth surface reduce soft tissue irritation. Pre‐bent steel plate reduce the use of the bender. ② The nail hole on one side of the titanium plate is “C” shaped and is not completely closed. ③ Large perspective window for easy Intraoperative and postoperative observation, convenient bone grafting. ④ Locking shrapnel to prevent the screw from automatically exiting.
Figure 3The application of the new open dynamic anterior cervical nail plate system in anterior cervical decompression surgery.
Figure 4The working principle of the new open dynamic anterior cervical nail plate system (coronal plane).
Figure 5The working principle of the new open dynamic anterior cervical nail plate system (sagittal plane).
Figure 6Fatigue experiment of open‐power cervical anterior titanium plate.
Figure 7Pull out the experiment of open‐power cervical anterior titanium plate.
ROM (°) of two groups of cervical C4–C6 segments in two states
| Direction of movement | Group A ( | Group B ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | After being fixed | Normal | After being fixed | |
| Flexion | 6.71 ± 0.93 | 1.23 ± 0.16 | 6.38 ± 0.84 | 1.07 ± 0.26 |
| Stretch | 6.39 ± 0.89 | 1.37 ± 0.19 | 5.96 ± 0.91 | 1.46 ± 0.57 |
| Left side bend | 6.52 ± 1.14 | 1.01 ± 0.21 | 6.53 ± 1.03 | 1.23 ± 0.38 |
| Right side bend | 6.98 ± 1.07 | 0.99 ± 0.19 | 6.58 ± 1.29 | 0.82 ± 0.21 |
| Left rotation | 6.59 ± 0.97 | 1.36 ± 0.34 | 5.81 ± 0.72 | 1.39 ± 0.48 |
| Right rotation | 6.15 ± 0.94 | 1.12 ± 0.09 | 6.33 ± 1.16 | 1.27 ± 0.14 |
Compared with the normal state after fixation, P < 0.05.
Pull‐out experimental force (N) of the two types of nail board systems (mean±SD)
| Direction of movement | Group A ( | Group B ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | After being fixed | Normal | After being fixed | |
| Flexion position | 5.73 ± 1.29 | 0.96 ± 0.29 | 6.02 ± 0.91 | 0.91 ± 0.43 |
| Side bend | 5.29 ± 0.77 | 0.79 ± 0.14 | 5.27 ± 1.06 | 0.87 ± 0.32 |
| Rotation bit | 5.12 ± 0.63 | 1.02 ± 0.43 | 5.11 ± 0.59 | 0.94 ± 0.27 |
Compared with the normal state after fixation, P < 0.05.
Figure 8ROM diagram of the two groups before and after fixation of the fixed cervical spine plate.
Fatigue experiments on the two nail board systems
| Nails | Load (N) | Frequency (HZ) | Cycles | Fatigue strength (MPa) | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open dynamic type nail anterior cervical plate | 100 | 0.5 | 6.0 × 105 | 503.31 | Damage |
| Atlantis nail board | 100 | 0.5 | 6.1 × 105 | 511.79 | Damage |
Pull‐out experimental force (N) of the two types of nail board systems (mean±SD)
| Test index | Nail board system | Simple screw | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open dynamic type nail anterior cervical plate | Atlantis nail board | Open dynamic type nail anterior cervical plate | Atlantis nail board | |
| Maximum pullout force | 423.69 ± 27.18 | 397.52 ± 23.64 | 281.43 ± 23.11 | 268.86 ± 19.63 |
Figure 9Fracture diagram of fatigue test steel plate.