Yannick Fotio1, Francesca Palese1, Pablo Guaman Tipan1, Faizy Ahmed1,2, Daniele Piomelli1,3,2. 1. Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California. 2. Center for the Study of Cannabis, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California. 3. Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is an intracellular serine amidase that terminates the signalling of various lipid messengers involved in pain regulation, including anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide. Here, we investigated the effects of pharmacological or genetic FAAH removal on tolerance to the anti-nociceptive effects of morphine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We induced tolerance in male and female mice by administering twice-daily morphine for 7 days while monitoring nociceptive thresholds by the tail immersion test. The globally active FAAH inhibitor URB597 (1 and 3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.) or the peripherally restricted FAAH inhibitor URB937 (3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.) were administered daily 30 min prior to morphine, alone or in combination with the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.), the CB2 receptor antagonist AM630 (3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.), or the PPAR-α antagonist GW6471 (4 mg·kg-1 , i.p.). Spinal levels of FAAH-regulated lipids were quantified by LC/MS-MS. Gene transcription was assessed by RT-qPCR. KEY RESULTS: URB597 prevented and reversed morphine tolerance in both male and female mice. This effect was mimicked by genetic FAAH deletion, but not by URB937. Treatment with AM630 suppressed, whereas treatment with AM251 or GW6471, attenuated the effects of URB597. Anandamide mobilization was enhanced in the spinal cord of morphine-tolerant mice. mRNA levels of the anandamide-producing enzyme N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine PLD (NAPE-PLD) and the palmitoylethanolamide receptor PPAR-α, but not those for CB2 , CB1 receptors or FAAH, were elevated in spinal cord CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: FAAH-regulated lipid signalling in the CNS modulated opiate tolerance, suggesting FAAH as a potential target for opiate-sparing medications.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH) is an intracellular serine amidase that terminates the signalling of various lipid messengers involved in pain regulation, including anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide. Here, we investigated the effects of pharmacological or genetic FAAH removal on tolerance to the anti-nociceptive effects of morphine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We induced tolerance in male and female mice by administering twice-daily morphine for 7 days while monitoring nociceptive thresholds by the tail immersion test. The globally active FAAH inhibitor URB597 (1 and 3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.) or the peripherally restricted FAAH inhibitor URB937 (3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.) were administered daily 30 min prior to morphine, alone or in combination with the cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 (3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.), the CB2 receptor antagonist AM630 (3 mg·kg-1 , i.p.), or the PPAR-α antagonist GW6471 (4 mg·kg-1 , i.p.). Spinal levels of FAAH-regulated lipids were quantified by LC/MS-MS. Gene transcription was assessed by RT-qPCR. KEY RESULTS: URB597 prevented and reversed morphine tolerance in both male and female mice. This effect was mimicked by genetic FAAH deletion, but not by URB937. Treatment with AM630 suppressed, whereas treatment with AM251 or GW6471, attenuated the effects of URB597. Anandamide mobilization was enhanced in the spinal cord of morphine-tolerant mice. mRNA levels of the anandamide-producing enzyme N-acyl-phosphatidylethanolamine PLD (NAPE-PLD) and the palmitoylethanolamide receptor PPAR-α, but not those for CB2 , CB1 receptors or FAAH, were elevated in spinal cord CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: FAAH-regulated lipid signalling in the CNS modulated opiate tolerance, suggesting FAAH as a potential target for opiate-sparing medications.
Authors: Jenny L Wilkerson; Sudeshna Ghosh; Mohammed Mustafa; Rehab A Abdullah; Micah J Niphakis; Roberto Cabrera; Rafael L Maldonado; Benjamin F Cravatt; Aron H Lichtman Journal: Neuropharmacology Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 5.250
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Arthur Christopoulos; Anthony P Davenport; Eamonn Kelly; Alistair Mathie; John A Peters; Emma L Veale; Jane F Armstrong; Elena Faccenda; Simon D Harding; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Jason R Clapper; Guillermo Moreno-Sanz; Roberto Russo; Ana Guijarro; Federica Vacondio; Andrea Duranti; Andrea Tontini; Silvano Sanchini; Natale R Sciolino; Jessica M Spradley; Andrea G Hohmann; Antonio Calignano; Marco Mor; Giorgio Tarzia; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2010-09-19 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Don Wei; DaYeon Lee; Conor D Cox; Carley A Karsten; Olga Peñagarikano; Daniel H Geschwind; Christine M Gall; Daniele Piomelli Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Roberto Russo; Jesse Loverme; Giovanna La Rana; Timothy R Compton; Jeff Parrott; Andrea Duranti; Andrea Tontini; Marco Mor; Giorgio Tarzia; Antonio Calignano; Daniele Piomelli Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2007-04-05 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Stephen P H Alexander; Alistair Mathie; John A Peters; Emma L Veale; Jörg Striessnig; Eamonn Kelly; Jane F Armstrong; Elena Faccenda; Simon D Harding; Adam J Pawson; Joanna L Sharman; Christopher Southan; Jamie A Davies Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: Lorenzo Di Cesare Mannelli; Marco Pistis; Mauro Congiu; Laura Micheli; Michele Santoni; Claudia Sagheddu; Anna Lisa Muntoni; Alexandros Makriyannis; Michael S Malamas; Carla Ghelardini Journal: Neurotherapeutics Date: 2021-09-22 Impact factor: 7.620
Authors: Richard A Slivicki; Vishakh Iyer; Sonali S Mali; Sumanta Garai; Ganesh A Thakur; Jonathon D Crystal; Andrea G Hohmann Journal: Front Mol Neurosci Date: 2020-04-28 Impact factor: 5.639