| Literature DB >> 32076001 |
Sylvain Maclot1,2, Jan Lahl3, Jasper Peschel3, Hampus Wikmark3, Piotr Rudawski3, Fabian Brunner3, Hélène Coudert-Alteirac3, Suvasthika Indrajith4, Bernd A Huber4, Sergio Díaz-Tendero5,6,7, Néstor F Aguirre8, Patrick Rousseau4, Per Johnsson9.
Abstract
This work presents a photodissociation study of the diamondoid adamantane using extreme ultraviolet femtosecond pulses. The fragmentation dynamics of the dication is unraveled by the use of advanced ion and electron spectroscopy giving access to the dissociation channels as well as their energetics. To get insight into the fragmentation dynamics, we use a theoretical approach combining potential energy surface determination, statistical fragmentation methods and molecular dynamics simulations. We demonstrate that the dissociation dynamics of adamantane dications takes place in a two-step process: barrierless cage opening followed by Coulomb repulsion-driven fragmentation.Entities:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32076001 PMCID: PMC7031298 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59649-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Structure of adamantane.
Figure 2XUV spectrum and the first three ionization thresholds of adamantane.
Figure 3Mass spectrum of cationic products resulting from the interaction between XUV pulses and neutral adamantane molecules (purple). The dashed gray lines correspond to the mass spectrum obtained by electron impact at 70 eV[39].
Figure 4Key energy levels of adamantane dication processes. (a) Double ionization threshold and lowest energy configurations for doubly charged adamantane found in the PES exploration. (b,c) Final energy levels of the fragmentation channels of the adamantane dication (2- and 3-body breakups) corresponding to the ones in Table 1. Energy levels in gray are not explicitly labelled but can be found in Table 1. The energy values are relative to the neutral ground state in units of eV.
List of correlated singly charged fragments coming from the dissociation of adamantane dication observed experimentally. In the case of n-body breakups with n > 2, the neutral losses are given in mass losses such that the chemical formulae have to be seen as chemical element indicators and not necessarily as fragments. BR stands for branching ratio and is given in percent. ΔE is the calculated final energy level of the dication fragmentation channels (2- and 3-body breakups) referred to the neutral ground state (in eV).
| Fragment 1 | Fragment 2 | Neutral loss | BR | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Formula | m (a.u.) | Formula | m (a.u.) | Formula | m (a.u.) | % | (eV) |
| 15 | 105 | CH4 | 16 | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 19.27 | ||
| 93 | C2H4 | 28 | 2.7 ± 0.2 | 20.32 | |||
| 91 | C2H6 | 30 | 4.3 ± 0.2 | 19.92 | |||
| 78 | C3H7 | 43 | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 22.24 | |||
| 29 | 107 | — | — | 23.3 ± 0.3 | 17.21 | ||
| 105 | H2 | 2 | 6.3 ± 0.2 | 18.11 | |||
| 92 | CH3 | 15 | 5.4 ± 0.2 | 20.18 | |||
| 91 | CH4 | 16 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 18.06 | |||
| 79 | C2H4 | 28 | 7.1 ± 0.2 | 19.05 | |||
| 41 | 95 | — | — | 2.5 ± 0.2 | 18.26 | ||
| 80 | CH3 | 15 | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 20.31 | |||
| 67 | C2H4 | 28 | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 19.78 | |||
| 55 | C3H4 | 40 | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 21.06 | |||
| 54 | C3H5 | 41 | 6.6 ± 0.2 | 21.42 | |||
| 42 | 94 | — | — | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 18.90 | ||
| 79 | CH3 | 15 | 6.4 ± 0.2 | 20.27 | |||
| 66 | C2H4 | 28 | 3.7 ± 0.2 | 20.80 | |||
| 55 | 81 | — | — | 2.3 ± 0.2 | 18.39 | ||
Figure 5Schematic of the dissociation of adamantane dication displaying the different energy quantities involved.
Figure 6Ion-ion correlation map resulting from the fragmentation of adamantane dications.
Figure 7Breakdown curves of the channels observed in the experiments for 2-body breakups (a) and 3-body breakups (b). The errors (shaded areas around curves) correspond to the standard deviation. The black dashed lines indicate the minimum of internal energy that we can reach in our case, meaning Erelax, and the gray areas mark the regions of internal energy that are inaccessible in the experiment.
Figure 8The average of the energy components Eint, Evib, and Erot is shown as a function of the internal energy. The errors (shaded areas around curves) correspond to the standard deviation.
Figure 9VMI images obtained after filtering using the partial covariance method on the TOF peaks correspond to the fragments C2H (a) and C8H (b) (left part: raw data and right part: inverted data). Artefacts are coming from intense signal (helium and parent ion) that were not filtered out by covariance analysis (see SI for more details). (c,d) Ion kinetic energy distributions of the respective fragments obtained by angular integration of the inverted data avoiding the artefacts signal and energy calibrated using ion trajectory simulations (SIMION[40]). (e) Kinetic energy release distribution (KERd) for the channel C2H / C8H obtained by convolution of the kinetic energy distributions of the two fragments.
Figure 10(a) Total photoelectron spectrum (purple). The black dashed lines indicate the position of helium photoelectrons. The gray line is the calculated sum of helium photoelectrons (Gaussian) and of the photoelectrons coming from the singly charged adamantane (taken from[38]) considering our XUV spectrum and the photoabsorption cross section of adamantane[8]. (b) Estimated photoelectron spectrum coming from double ionization of adamantane obtained as the difference between the purple and the gray curves of panel (a).