| Literature DB >> 32075604 |
Audrey Carlhan-Ledermann1, Bernard Laubscher1,2, Maja Steinlin3, Christian T Ulrich4, Rajeev Kumar Verma5, Mattia Rizzi6, Rodolfo Maduri7, Sebastian Grunt8.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Spinal epidural hematoma without significant trauma is a rare condition with potentially severe outcome. This case report and systematic review of the literature illustrates the clinical presentation, risk factors, evaluation, treatment and outcomes of spinal epidural hematoma without significant trauma in children. CASEEntities:
Keywords: Spinal epidural hematoma; Hemorrhage; MRI; Paraplegia; Hemophilia; Vascular malformation
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32075604 PMCID: PMC7029477 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-020-1957-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.125
Fig. 1MRI scans of case 1 and case 2. In case 1 (a–c) a hyperacute epidural hemorrhage was revealed (T1w isointense signal (1b) and T2w slightly hyperintense signal (1a)). In case 2 (d–f) a subacute hemorrhage was found (T1w hyperintense (2b), and T2w iso- to slightly hyperintense signal (2a)). Arrows: epidural hemorrhage, arrowheads: spinal cord.
Fig. 2Process for selecting articles for the literature review
Patient Characteristics at Presentation
| Age at diagnosis | Median 7 years (IQR 20–156 months), ( |
| Time delay (presentation to treatment) | Median 5.6 days (IQR 2.6–14.8 days), ( |
| Time delay (diagnosis to treatment) | Median 1.9 (IQR 0.7–5.7 days), (N = 117) |
| Symptom and signs at diagnosis | 153 |
| Pain | 137 (90%) |
| Back pain | 67 (43%) |
| Limb pain | 15 (10%) |
| Abdominal pain | 9 (6%) |
| Torticollis | 67 (43%) |
| Irritability | 38 (25%) |
| Tetraparesis | 48 (31%) |
| Hemiparesis | 96 (63%) |
| Sensory disturbances | 49 (32%) |
| Sphincter disturbance | 44 (29%) |
| Neurological deficit at initial presentation | 104 (68%) |
| Neurological deficit at diagnosis | 136 (89%) |
| Neuroimaging studies | 144 |
| MRI | 83 (58%) |
| CT | 15 (10%) |
| Myelography | 30 (21%) |
| MRI and CT | 14 (10%) |
| CT and myelography | 2 (1%) |
| Localization | 149 |
| Cervical | 21 (14%) |
| Cervico-thoracic | 82 (55%) |
| Thoracic | 37 (25%) |
| Thoraco-lumbar | 4 (2.5%) |
| Lumbar | 4 (2.5%) |
| Lumbo-sacral | 1 (1%) |
| Antero-posterior localization | 132 |
| Posterior | 112 (85%) |
| Anterior | 17 (13%) |
| Lateral | 3 (2%) |
| Etiology and contributing factors | 150 |
| Unknown | 57 (38%) |
| Trivial trauma | 30 (20%) |
| Vascular malformation | 21 (14%) |
| Arteriovenous malformation | 10 (48%) |
| Venous angioma | 4 (19%) |
| Angiolipoma | 2 (9%) |
| Hemangioma | 4 (19%) |
| Arteriovenous fistula | 1 (5%) |
| Coagulation disorder | 42 (28%) |
| Hemophilia A | 27 (64%) |
| Hemophilia B | 12 (29%) |
| Hemophilia A and B | 1 (2%) |
| Coagulopathy due to cholestasis | 1 (2%) |
| Unknown hemophilia | 1 (2%) |
| Treatment | 151 |
| Surgery and factor replacement | 12 (8%) |
| Factor replacement without surgery | 36 (24%) |
| Surgery without factor replacement | 103 (68%) |
CT computed tomography, IQR interquartile range, MRI magnetic resonance imaging
American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) Score at Diagnosis and at Last Follow Up
| Score | Explanation | At Diagnosis | At Last Follow-Up | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Complete | No motor or sensory function is preserved in the sacral segments S4–S5 | 38/153 (25%) | 3/148 (2%) |
| B | Incomplete | Sensory but no motor function is preserved below the neurological level and includes the sacral segments S4–S5 | 26/153 (17%) | 8/148 (5.5%) |
| C | Incomplete | Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and more than half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade less than 3 | 51/153 (33.5%) | 14/148 (9.5%) |
| D | Incomplete | Motor function is preserved below the neurological level, and at least half of key muscles below the neurological level have a muscle grade of 3 or more | 19/153 (12.5%) | 27/148 (18%) |
| E | Normal | Motor and sensory function are normal | 17/153 (11%) | 96/148 (65.5%) |
Fig. 3American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale at diagnosis and at last follow-up. Bar graph demonstrating the relationship of the ASIA Impairment Scale at diagnosis and at follow-up of children with SSEH