Literature DB >> 32075168

Adolescent Health Literacy in Beijing and Melbourne: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.

Shuaijun Guo1,2,3, Xiaoming Yu4, Elise Davis2, Rebecca Armstrong2, Elisha Riggs5,6, Lucio Naccarella2.   

Abstract

While adolescent health literacy has gained momentum, it is under-researched from a cross-cultural perspective. This study aims to compare health literacy among two cultural groups of secondary students in Beijing and Melbourne. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 770 students from five secondary schools in Beijing and Melbourne. A self-administered questionnaire was designed to collect information on health literacy (the eight-item health literacy assessment tool (HLAT-8), the Newest Vital Sign (NVS) and the 47-item Health Literacy Survey (HLS-47)), its antecedents and health outcomes. Overall, students' health literacy in Melbourne (n = 120) was higher than that in Beijing (n = 650): 28.25 ± 6.00 versus 26.37 ± 5.89 (HLAT-8); and 4.13 ± 1.73 versus 3.65 ± 1.64 (NVS). The proportion of students with low health literacy varied by instruments, representing 23.7-32.2% in Melbourne and 29.0%-45.5% in Beijing. In both cultural groups, students' self-efficacy, social support, and perceptions of school environment were associated with their health literacy, which in turn predicted their health behaviours, patient-provider communication and health status. Given the nature of our study design and small samples, a cautious conclusion would be that adolescent health literacy is sensitive to the broad cultural context and might be an interactive outcome influenced by an individual's health skills and the social environment. Particularly, creating a supportive school environment is critical to develop adolescent health literacy that would eventually contribute to better health outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Australia; China; cross-culture; health literacy; health outcomes; secondary students

Year:  2020        PMID: 32075168     DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041242

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  6 in total

1.  A Comparative Study on Adolescents' Health Literacy in Europe: Findings from the HBSC Study.

Authors:  Leena Paakkari; Minna Torppa; Joanna Mazur; Zuzana Boberova; Gorden Sudeck; Michal Kalman; Olli Paakkari
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Health Literacy Research Around the World: More Important Than Ever in a Time of COVID-19.

Authors:  Tetine Sentell; Sandra Vamos; Orkan Okan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Evaluating Health Literacy among Adolescent and Young Adult Pregnant Women from a Low-Income Area of Northeast Brazil.

Authors:  Allen Suzane França; Catherine M Pirkle; Tetine Sentell; Maria P Velez; Marlos R Domingues; Diego G Bassani; Saionara M A Câmara
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Subjective Generic Health Literacy and Its Associated Factors among Adolescents: Results of a Population-Based Online Survey in Germany.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin M Loer; Olga M Domanska; Christiane Stock; Susanne Jordan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Promoting Navigation Health Literacy at the Intersection of Schools and Communities. Development of the Game-Based Intervention Nebolus.

Authors:  Kevin Dadaczynski; Verena Krah; Demian Frank; Elisabeth Zügel-Hintz; Fabrice Pöhlmann
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-17

6.  Comparison of Health Literacy Assessment Tools among Beijing School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Shuaijun Guo; Xiaoming Yu; Elise Davis; Rebecca Armstrong; Lucio Naccarella
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.